7 Responses to “ජාතිවාදීන් කවු ද?”

1. Ananda-USA Says:
   June 26th, 2017 at 7:45 pm

   I completely agree with what you have written here, Nalin!

   In the UK, the Queen is not only the constititional Head of the Government, but is also the Head of the Church of England, and is anointed the Defender of that Faith. No one who does not belong to the Church of England may marry into the Royal Family, or hold any important post such as a Cabinet Minister. The prime minister must belong to the Anglican Church. In short, the Church of England is the SOLE State Religion in the United Kingdom. Other religions are allowed to exist and their followers are accorded most, but not all, rights that Anglican Christians have. There was a long and bitter struggle between Catholics and the Protestant Anglican religion before and after King Henry the 8th broke away from the Catholic Church to form the Anglican Church and appoint himself as it’s SOLE Head!

   If the Anglican Church is accorded all of these rights as the State Religion in the UK, where the Parliamentary system of Government originated, why is it that the leaders of Sri Lanka are SO RELUCTANT to declare and embed the SUPREMACY of our Buddhist religion in our Motherland which has a FAR LONGER HISTORY of Buddhism as the State Religion?

   We, the Sinhala Buddhists of Sri Lanka, must once again RESTORE to POWER a PATRIOTIC GOVERNMENT unambiguously COMMITTED to acknowledging and restoring the Sinhala Buddhist character of our Motherland in the Constitution and in ALL areas of National Government. The longer we fail to act, the more that character is undermined, and the more it erodes!

   Let this ABSOLUTE ROT of Sanhidiyawa & Sahajeevanayaya which is a THIN VEIL for suppressing and subjugating the Sinhala Buddhist character of this nation to an international MULTICULTURAL definition of what Sri Lanka, be ABANDONED RIGHT NOW!

   In SWRD’s revolution in 1956 the FIRST STAGE of this battle in Modern Sri Lanka was initiated and largely WON! Let the SECOND STAGE of the battle to PETMANENTLY EMBED and SECURE the Sinhala Buddhist character of Sri Lanka BEGIN NOW with the OUSTER of this PARA-GATHI Yamapalanaya, and the RESTORATION of an UNAMBIGUOUSLY PATRIOTIC National Government!

2. Leela Says:
   June 27th, 2017 at 3:59 pm

   ජාතිවාදය සහ අාගම් වාදය කුමක්දැය් ඉන්ගිරිසි ඩික්ෂනරි පැහැදිලිව කියය්.

   ඉන්ගිරිසි ඩික්ෂනරි කියන්නේ ජාතිවාදය යනු තම ජාතිය අනෙක් ජාතින්ට වඩා උසස් යය් ප්‍රකාෂ කිරීම, අනෙක් ජාතින් පහත් කිරීම, තමන්ගේ ජාතිය නොවන අයට හින්සා කිරීම අාදීයය්.

   කුරාණයේ පද මුස්ලිමුන් ඉතා උසස් බව කියනවා. මුස්ලිම් නොවන්නන් සතුන්ට සමාන කරල තියනවා. මුස්ලිම් නොවන්නන් මරන්න කියනවා. මුස්ලිම් නොවන්නන් මුස්ලිමුන් අල්ලාගත් රටවලින් පන්නන්න කියනවා, යන්නෙ නැති නම් අාගමික ටැක්ස් ගහන්න කියනවා, මරන්න කියනවා. ISIS කාරයින් ක්‍රිස්තියානුවන් මරන මොහතෙදි එසේ උපදෙස් දෙන කුරාණයේ පද ප්‍රසිද්ධයේ උපුටා දක්වනවා. ISIS කාරයින් වැනි අල්ලා වෙනුවෙන් මිනී මරන්නන් සහ සටන් කරන්නන් ජිහාඩියන් බවත් ඔවුන් අල්ලාගේ සදාකාලික දිව්‍ය ලෝකයට ගොස් සැමදා කන්‍යවන් සමග සැමදා වසන්න යන බවත් කුරාණයේ පැහැදිලිව කියා තියනවා.

   බෞද්ධාගමේ සහ ත්‍රිපිටකයේ කොතනකවත් අනෙක් අාගමිකයන් පහත් කර නැහැ. තම ජාතිය (සිංහලයා) අනෙක් ජාතින්ට වඩා උසස් යය් කිසිම හිමි නමක් කොතනකවත් කියල තියනවා අපි අහල නැහැ. දැන් කවුද ජාති වාදී?

   තම ජාතිය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටීම ජාතිවාදය නොවෙය්.

   තම ජාතිය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටීම ජාතිමාමකත්වයය්. මෑත අතීතයේ මිගෙට්‌ටුවත්තේ ගුණානන්ද, වාරියපොල හා හික්‌කඩුවේ සුමංගල, කුඩාපොල රාහුල වැනි නෙයෙකුත් හිමි වරැ සිංහල ජාතිය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටියා. එවැනි හිමි වරැන් අද ඉදිරියට පැමින සිංහල බෞද්ධයන් බේරා ගත යුතුය.

3. Senerath Says:
   June 27th, 2017 at 4:47 pm

   “බෞද්ධාගමේ සහ ත්‍රිපිටකයේ කොතනකවත් අනෙක් අාගමිකයන් පහත් කර නැහැ.”

   I am not sure about this. Buddha always implied that “ignorance” and “craving” as the two basic problems. By following other religions one can never overcome ignorance. There are plenty of examples Buddha argued and made other religous leaders to feel themselves like fools. Upali Sutta (MN56) is a good example where Upali ( converted to Buddhism after hard argument with Buddha) insulted (by proper argument, not harsh words) his previous teacher Nighatanathaputta in front of a large number of followers.
   It is not true that Buddha encouraged people to follow their own religion. Kalama Sutta is famous for that.

4. Leela Says:
   June 28th, 2017 at 11:00 pm

   I must say, I am a mare novice to the vast Buddhistic knowledge. Anyway, it is common knowledge that all religions aim to thrive. Hence dissemination of its Dhamma is no exception to Buddhism as well. Of course, Buddha aimed to proselytize and indeed converted followers of other religious leaders. What matters is; he is said to have instructed his new disciples to respect their former masters. And that perhaps is unique to Buddha.

5. Ananda-USA Says:
   June 29th, 2017 at 12:47 am

   Patriots MUST SEE: The VERY BEST MOST COMPREHENSIVE SPEECH by Wimal Weerawansa on the Sallala Aanduwa

   EVERYTHING we patriots have been writing about at LankaWeb he addresses here:

   Part I:Wimal Weerawansa (NFF) :- සල්ලාල ආණ්ඩුව සහ කෙලෙසෙනා ලක්මව (1) පළමු කොටස

   https://youtu.be/wVwZ6lmEZsE

   Part II:Wimal Weerawansa (NFF) :- සල්ලාල ආණ්ඩුව සහ කෙලෙසෙනා ලක්මව (2) දෙවන කොටස

   https://youtu.be/pkYA_byHOaA

   Part III:Wimal Weerawansa (NFF) :- සල්ලාල ආණ්ඩුව සහ කෙලෙසෙනා ලක්මව (3) තුන්වන කොටස

   https://youtu.be/HRxHbupZ6sw

6. Senerath Says:
   June 29th, 2017 at 2:27 am

   Leela,
   Me too. But all the text is now in the internet and anyone can read. I don’t like to go inot too much details but i must say that very statement of you mentioned about Buddha asked new disciples to respect previous teachers has been interpreted from Upali Sutta too ! You must read it ( spend 15 mins only).
   https://suttacentral.net/en/mn56

   In summary, Upali , a well learned follower of Niganthanathaputta promises his teacher he would defeat Buddha by proper argument goes to Buddha and after a lengthy argument Buddha proved to him he was wrong and Nighanta’s dhamma was wrong. Then he asked Buddha to consider him as a deciple but Buddha ask him to investigate thoroughly instead. He was even more impressed because normally other teachers don’t say that and asks again. Then Buddha says “ Householder, your family has long supported the Nighantas and you should consider giving alms to them when they come “. ( Now, note that this is not a statement of telling him to respect his previous teacher but Buddha being compassionate asked him not to hurt him by refusing to give food. ). When this is said Upali was even more impressed and asked Buddha to grant him discipleship for the 3rd time. Then Budhdha gave him more advice and taught him four noble truth and he because a Sothapanna.
   However, after going back home, he instructed the gatekeeper to close the door to Niganthas. Then when surprised Nigantas came, he openly humiliated them. Don’t forget Niganthas was a main religion then and even now.

   My point, Leela, is nowadays politicians, NGO’s and even some monks distort Buddha Dhamma and misinterpret to their advantage. They say Buddha encouraged Multi-faith nonsence ! They say Buddha brought the message of peace ! That is not ture. He never asked anyone to repect other religious masters or religions ( according to my knowledge).
   If someone can show me ONE sutta where he said so, I am greatful and will say sorry. He only asked people to respect those people who are wise , do not harm anyone and whose advice would be benficial to people spritually.

7. Christie Says:
   June 29th, 2017 at 4:57 am

   මේ ආන්ඩුව පත් උනේ හින්දු ඉන්දියානු පරපෝසිත චන්ද වලින්. චන්ද ගනන් හිලව් බලන්න.

   ගරු තර සෝබිත දූසිත බන පොත පෙරලුව, ගරු තර නාන සාර කිතු හා මුස්ලිම් චන්ද කඩා දැම්ම.

   ඉන්දියානු අදිරදය ඉන්දියානු පරපෝසිත චන්ද කුට්ටියෙන් මේ ගොල්ල බලයට පතකලා.

   උසස්කුල මේඅයට අපි කුලහීනයෝ.

   තිරුක්කුරල් ලියපු එක්කෙනාගෙ පිලිම දහසයක් අපේ රටේ අටවනව. හැබැයි ඒ පිලිමයක් හාදිවාර් IHardiwar, Uttrakand, India) වල අටවන්න ඉඩ දෙන්නෙ නැහැ.

   Wake up Sinhales. Unite and stan up to India.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Disclaimer: The comments contained within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site. All views and opinions presented in this article are solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of LankaWeb.com.

This entry was posted on Monday, June 26th, 2017. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response.