False complaint made by the Swiss embassy in Sri Lanka to tarnish the image of the government and the people of Sri Lanka.
Posted on December 20th, 2019
Ranjith Soysa Spokesperson – SPUR , Victoria
We refer to a recent statement made by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs alleging that due process was not followed by the Sri Lankan law enforcement authorities when investigating the alleged abduction of an employee of the Swiss embassy, Garnier Banister Francis aka Sriyalatha Perera. If the accusation is about not following due process” let us remind the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs about what the Good Book says You hypocrite, first remove the beam out of your own eye, and then you can see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother’s eye” What the Swiss government defines as due process” is clearly not what we define to be the same. There definitely is a problem regarding due process” here!!
Continuing on the above topic, was due process” followed when the Swiss government granted asylum
to a criminal Nishantha de Silva Candappa, wanted by our government for
smuggling sensitive information which compromises national security of our
country? The answer clearly is NO. The abduction” drama was crafted by the
Swiss embassy as a smoke screen to divert attention from this illegal and
hostile act by the Swiss Government. Now that this entire Mock Drama” has
blown up in the face of the Swiss government, just stay
silent rather than damaging the credibility of the Swiss authorities, if there is any left at
all.
The allegations are in relation to the interrogation of the alleged victim for
30 hours over 3 days which the Swiss allege was done when she was not
well and to statements made by officials while the investigation was in progress.
The Swiss government needs to be reminded that it was the Swiss embassy and the
Swiss Foreign Office who (A)
didn’t follow due process by not making a formal complaint to the Sri
Lanka Police, ( B) by not co-operating
with the Sri Lanka Police until a court order was issued asking for the alleged
victim to make a statement to the Sri Lanka Police. It is also alleged that the
Swiss Ambassador to Sri Lanka has not surrendered the alleged victim’s mobile
phone to the Sri Lanka police.
The Swiss government also wanted to use an air ambulance to evacuate the
alleged victim to Switzerland stating that the alleged victim’s health
was deteriorating. They “concluded” that as her health was
deteriorating hence that she was not in a fit state to give a statement to
the police. According to the Swiss government, a Swiss
doctor had made an assessment by examining the alleged victim via a video link.
This action too was highly irregular and cannot be considered as being one that
was in accordance with due process as it is only a Sri Lankan judicial medical officer who is legally
empowered to determine the fitness of a
person to participate in a judicial process. In this instance the Swiss
government has arrogated to itself powers that are vested in the government of Sri
Lanka.
Subsequently it was determined by a Sri Lankan judicial medical officer that
she was in a fit state to be interviewed by the police.
In complete contrast to the Swiss government, the Sri Lankan government
strictly followed due process and desisted from commenting on a recent
judgement by a Swiss court where the court determined that the LTTE couldn’t be
categorised as a criminal organisation. This is despite the judgement which is
highly questionable as the LTTE is a
banned terrorist organization worldwide and is viewed as very detrimental to the national
interests of Sri Lanka.
The Swiss government should take note that the best way for them to ensure that
due process is followed is by not acting like an imperial power and by stopping
their interference in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka and by respecting the
sovereignty of Sri Lanka, by abiding by the laws of Sri Lanka and by fully
co-operating with the Sri Lankan law enforcement and judicial authorities.
In short, the Swiss authorities should allow the Sri Lankan law to take it’s
natural course without attempting to subvert it as they are attempting to do
currently. State Secretary
Pascale Baeriswyl has said Switzerland takes its responsibilities to its staff
very seriously. Then we suggest you replace the present staff members who were
involved in this comedy of errors” with more sensible people.
Yours sincerely,
Ranjith Soysa
Spokesperson – SPUR , Victoria
December 21st, 2019 at 2:25 am
If this woman is a Sri Lankan citizen, working in the counsel may be knowing the immigration rules of Switzerland .She seem to have changed her name more than once, perhaps from the ethnic minorities? She may have set it up to play the victim and seek asylum.
This whole affaire is bizarre.
December 21st, 2019 at 1:49 pm
Before Swiss Embassy Officials making allegations against Sri Lankan Authorities, SWISS EMBASSY & SWISS GOVERNMNT AUTHORITIES SHOULD EXPLAIN IN SHORT AS TO 1) WHY & 2) HOW? THE EMBASSY ISSUED VISAS OVERNIGHT AND DEPORT A SRI LANKAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL ( WITH HIS ENTIRE FAMILY), WANTED IN CONNECTION TO CERTAIN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES???????????
TO COVER UP THIS FRAUD,THE SWISS FOOLS CREATED THIS SAGA OF A SRI LANKAN WOMAN WORKING IN THE SWISS EMBASSY WAS HUMILIATED & RAPED & THREATENED BY KEEPING A PISTOL INTO HER MOUTH ACCORDING TO THE ROBBER RAJITHA a former Govt Minister.
DEAR EMBASSY LOW CLASS OFFICIALS! THIS IS CALLED !) DHITTA !!) DHAMMA !!!)VEDANEEYA KARMA,ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHISM????/ THAT MEANS,EVERY ACTION HAS AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION???