BUDDHIST VIHARAS AND EELAM Part 4 D1
Posted on July 26th, 2023
KAMALIKA PIERIS
The Tamil Separatist Movement invented a fictitious Tamil Buddhism to prevent Sinhalese taking over the Buddhist ruins in the north. Buddhist ruins, dated to the ancient and medieval periods and looking just like the ruins in the south were found in abundance in the north and east of Sri Lanka. This was a great blow to the Tamil Separatist Movement.
Ven. Santhabodhi said that an academic from the University of Jaffna had arrived at Kurundi. He had been sent to find proof that Kurundi was not Buddhist. On his return he had stated that it was not possible to deny that Kurundi was Buddhist, but we can say it is Tamil Buddhism and keep the Sinhalese out”.
However, the evidence which shows that the North was Sinhala does not come from its Buddhist ruins. They come from Sinhala place names, cattle branding and the Vallipuram gold plate. Vallipuram plate was a valuable find. It showed that the north was ruled by the Sinhala king. The Vallipuram plate was to be kept away from the Sinhala public, but its Tamil custodian waited for the right time and gave it to the Sinhalese.
Tamil Buddhism” means Buddhism transmitted in Tamil as part of the Tamil culture.The fictitious Tamil Buddhism of the Northern Province must therefore come from Tamilnadu, not Anuradhapura.
Tamilnadu certainly had a Buddhist period and made a limited contribution to Buddhist civilization. Tamilnadu produced three Buddhist scholars Buddhagosa, Buddhadatta, and Dhammapala. But there is some doubt whether Buddhagosa was Tamil.
Tamilnadu produced several Tamil Buddhist epics, such as Manimekalai. 11th-century Veerasoliyam shows the prominence given to Buddhism in Tamil scholarship. Tolkappiyam, the earliest Tamil grammar, written around the 3rd century BC, was written by a Buddhist. It was widely used in the Buddhist monasteries of Sri Lanka by those who knew Tamil.
Buddhism did not last long in Tamilnadu. Buddhism was eliminated from Tamilnadu, by Tamilnadu’s Bhakti movement, which started in the 7th century .The Bhakti movement focused on Hindu gods and goddesses with special emphasis on Siva and Vishnu. It was a militant movement. It opposed Buddhism. Buddhism lost popular support and also the patronage of the rulers. Tamilnadu became Hindu and has remained Hindu ever since. There are no Buddhist monuments on show in Tamilnadu today.
However, Mavali Rajan and Palas Kumar Saha (2020) stated that Buddhism did not disappear after the Bhakti cult came. Nagapattinam had a Buddhist colony and a Buddhist temple complex long after the arrival of Bhakti. 127 other Buddhist sites belonging to the same period were found along the coast, challenging the theory that Buddhism had vanished from Tamilnadu after Bhakti.
Rajan and Saha then went on to say that Buddhism flourished in Tamilnadu during two periods, firstly in the early years of the Pallava rule (400-650 AD) and secondly in the Chola period (mid 9th to the early 14th century AD) . The evidence for both Pallava and Chola Buddhism is in the Buddhist shrines at Nagapattinam, Kanchipuram and Kaveripattinam,,
Hiuen Tsang had counted 50 monasteries and 4500 monks when he visited India in Pallava time. The Chola rulers did not did not allow Buddhism in the royal court, they were dedicated Saivites. But they allowed the establishment of a huge Buddhist complex at Nāgapaṭṭiṉam in the 10th and 11th century, for political reasons.
Other South Indian states fared better with Buddhism. The present day Hindu temples in Kerala show the influence of Vatadage architecture. Buddhism declined in Karnataka by 7th century, but Mahayana Buddhism continued in pockets till the 12th Century. Gujarat had Buddhist rock cut caves of 1-4 AD at Talaja and Dhank.Devnimori had a monastery and stupa.
Buddhism was strongest in Andhra Pradesh. Andhra Pradesh has 140 listed Buddhist sites, the best known are Nagarjunakonda, Amaravati and Bavikonda. Buddhism and commerce went together and Andhra Pradesh was at the centre of trade routes. Five routes converged at the capital, Vengi. The Andhra kings were known as Vengi kings.
The rock cut monasteries in the Western Ghats show that Buddhism was strong in Maharashtra too. Ajanta and Ellora in northern Maharashtra are well known but there are more than 50 other sets of rock cut temples. Kanheri caves were a major monastic education centre. It became Mahayana later.These cave temples were executed by several dynasties ruling in Maharashtra such as Satavahana, Vakataka, and Rashtrakuta.
The Tamil Separatist Movement has sporadically put forward the notion of Tamil Buddhism in Sri Lanka .TNA MP S. Sritharan said in Parliament in 2011, that people who lived in places such as Madagal and Nandagal were Tamil Buddhists and they have left evidence of this . Historians say Nagadeepa and Kantarodai are Sinhala Buddhist settlements. In fact they are Tamil Buddhist settlements. The Sinhalese and Tamils are the two main races in the country and both have their heritage. Equal importance must be given to protecting not only the cultural heritage of the Sinhalese but also of the Tamils.
In 1995, Buddhist items in Jaffna museum were labeled Tamil said historian DGB de Silva at a talk on the archaeology of the Jaffna peninsula, given at the RASSL in 2012. University of Jaffna has added the subject Buddhism in Tamilnadu” to its courses of study.
Tamil Separatist Movement looked to see whether Tamils in Sri Lanka had actually embraced Buddhism . The ICES journal Nethra, published a piece by K.B. Malik on the subject (2002).
Malik looked at the Census data and found that there were 12,813 Tamil Buddhists, in the 1881 census Most were in the Western province. By 1891 Tamil Buddhists had grown to 15,861. JP Lewis writing of the Vanni, (1895) said that there were three Sinhala Hindus but he had not seen them. Also four Tamil Buddhists who also he has not seen.
Ponnambalam Arunachalam said in the 1901 Census report that many Tamil who were really Hindu had been given as Buddhist due to a misunderstanding with the census takers. And in the 1911 Census the enumerator was asked to check when Tamils said they were Buddhist whether they went to kovil or temple. In the 1921 and 1945 Censuses there were no Tamil Buddhists in the Western province or anywhere else, concluded Malik..
There is no evidence to show that Tamil Buddhism ever existed in the north. But there is plenty of evidence to show that Sinhala Buddhism was practiced there. The Buddhist ruins found in the north and east are identical to the Buddhist ruins found in the south. The Buddha image, its headdress, the way the robe is draped, the mudras, are identical to those in the south. Similalry, the stupa mounds, the guard stone, siripatula, yupa gala and the script used in the inscriptions, resemble those found in the south.
Buddhist countries developed their own distinctive Buddha image. Sri Lanka has the Samadhi Buddha. Thailand favored the bhumi sparsha pose and also did the walking Buddha. If there really was a separate Tamil Buddhism in the north, excavations would have produced a distinct Tamil Buddha statue. Nagapattinam yielded Buddha statues, small ones, I think, but no one has said that our statues resemble Nagapattinam.
The American missionaries who arrived in Jaffna in 1813 looked carefully at the culture they had come to meddle with. They made inquiries about religion because that was their main interest. If there had been any kind of Tamil Buddhism in Jaffna, even if it was held only in oral tradition, and had only been practiced in the dim past, the American missionaries would have sniffed it out and stated it in their records. But the American missionaries say nothing about Tamil Buddhism .
Lastly, if the Tamil Separatist Movement honestly thought that the ruins were those of their own precious Tamil Buddhism ,they would have preserved them for political reasons, not destroy them as they are doing today. Shenali Waduge observed that genuine Tamil Buddhists would protect the Buddhist heritage sites in the north, not vandalilse them. (CONTINUED)