20 Responses to “87 මැයි දින තහනමට එරෙහිව ජීවිත 2ක් දිවිපුදා අළු නොවූ අරගලය-ලෙයින්, යකඩින් සහ ගින්දරින් මර්දනය කළ 1986-90 භීෂණ යුගයේ සත්‍ය කථා – 95 කොටස”

1. Dilrook Says:
   May 1st, 2016 at 2:10 am

   I disagree with the writer that some of those died (1987-90) fighting for the rights of workers. If so their timing was totally wrong. From 1986 to 1990 Sri Lanka faced multiple challenges economically, politically and militarily. Everyone had to make sacrifices. Most sacrificed their living conditions, economic conditions and hopes temporarily during this time.

   An Indian army invaded the nation and the Colombo government was powerless on many fronts. In 1989 the economic growth rate went negative mostly due to troubles created by the JVP making a bad situation worse.

   Strangely, the government didn’t cave in and workers found conditions acceptable after 1989. The economy grew and jobs became plentiful (than before).

   A more farsighted and careful approach avoiding confrontation would have saved so many young precious Sinhala lives. I blame all parties to the unrest (including the government), their behind the scene instigators and criminals that killed or tortured for the miserable time period. These events must be avoided at all cost.

2. Ancient Sinhalaya Says:
   May 1st, 2016 at 3:01 am

   How do they do that? How do they get away with murder every time?
   Catholic-run UNPatriotic party get Sinhalese police, Sinhalese tri forces to kill Sinhalese. Nobody
   noticed it was Sinhalese lives they want to destroy.

   It is obvious from the 30-year old long war UNPatriotic party did not want to end since catholic
   tigers of tamil drealam were killing Sinhalese. So why stop it? Nobody could see the motives behind
   prolonging the war. Are Sinhalese really really stupid? We have to admit we are! All those years nobody
   pointed out why the catholic-run UNPatriotic party brutally massacred Buddhists jvpers and didn’t want
   to hurt the catholic tigers of tamil drealam. Not even after attacking Sri Maha Bodhi and Sri Dalada Maligawa
   killing pilgrims. Not even after the massacre of Buddhist monks in Aranthalawa. Catholic tigers of tamil drealam
   killed/hurt 0 priests, damaged 0 churches. Did those Sinhala modayas paused for a moment and wondered why?
   No! Did Sinhala modayas paused for a moment and wonder why staunchly catholic countries like norway, italy,
   uk, us, argentina, brasis etc. supported catholic tigers of tamil drealam? Even archbishop two three of south africa started shouting from roof tops thousands of miles away? Did those Sinhala modays know hitler pira(mala)paharan, tamil selvan, anton balasinyo, etc were catjholics? Obviously not? That’s how stupid we are. Even we say this time and again, there are still a lot of Sinhala Buurowo around and believe catholic-run media’s propaganda. Don’t prove
   Sinhalaya modaya again and again. Think if you have a brain Sinhala buurowan who supports this Buddhist-killing
   party. Remember Soma Thero? Can you figure out who was behind it?

   To those Sinhala buurowo, pol pot ponil is a saint. They can’t remember 60,000 Buddhist jvpers or more than
   100,000 Buddhist civilians (including monks, children and women), forces’ personnel, policemen and policewomen
   sacrificed by the catholic run UNPatriotic party in order to destroy Buddhist population in Sri Lanka. Lk alugosu porisada sent 600 policemen to ltte bullet. Just like that. Pol pot ponil grassed millennium city intelligent officers
   to ltte to expedite their cause. He couldn’t wait to give half the country to his catholic buddy hitler pira(mala)paharan. To them, pol
   pot ponil is a saint. Those Sinhala buuruwan should read Batalanda report to see how catholic traitor chief pol pot ponil
   and his catholic policemen brutally killed Sinhalese in the camp. These UNPatriotic party supporting Sinhalese
   really are buuruwos!

3. Fran Diaz Says:
   May 1st, 2016 at 3:55 am

   We agree with Ancient Sinhalaya.
   In Sri Lanka, it is always the Sinhala (Buddhists) who pay dearly in terms of lives. The GoSL of those times (1970s & 80s) never invited the JVP for talks. As a result, frustrations build up and violence happens.
   In contrast, five rounds of talks happened with the LTTE, with no positive results.

   * The JVP fought for better basic needs.
   * The LTTE was fighting for much more – the Tamil Caste Wars imported from Tamil Nadu, plus a Separate State, Eelam, encouraged by ex-Colonists.

   Given that :
   Some 500 yrs of pro Colonial attitudes still continue with some leaders, especially those leading the present GoSL. The Cold War period since the end of WW II (1945) till 1991 played its part in continuing to divide within (divide & rule) especially the Colonised nations, even after so called Independence. This was due to Labor in such countries following the Communist or Socialist ideals.

   We can hardly expect Labor to follow Capitalist ideals …. ? They will naturally follow Socialist ideals in any part of the world.

   In any country, only a few people are truly talented Entrepreneurs to suit the purely Capitalist plan. Most people in the masses are either Govt clerical workers, Agricultural workers, or laborers, etc.
   Thus society gets divided, and the ‘divide & rule’ falls into place with Fascist type governments.

   One would think that DEMOCRATIC Governments are geared for the needs of the masses and not just to serve the needs of the wealthy. It is also the responsibility of the masses to keep numbers down to suit the resources of the country through Family Planning & Birth Control, which ought to be offered as a free service to adults via any GoSL.

   That kind of approach to life would add up to a responsible Democracy, from both govt as well as from the masses.

   So long as the UNP follows a mostly Capitalism appraoch, and the other parties follow a more Socialist approach, there will be trouble in Lanka, with the ‘divide & rule’ in place, much to the delight of neo-Colonists.

4. Fran Diaz Says:
   May 1st, 2016 at 4:01 am

   NB:

   – The First insurrection (early 1970s, Mrs B’s time) by the JVP was due to Unemployment problems.
   – The Second insurrection by the JVP was due to the imposing under Duress of the 13-A by India (late 1980s, JRJ’s time).

   Both times, NO talks were held by the GoSL.

5. Christie Says:
   May 1st, 2016 at 8:23 am

   JVP was funded by India and Indian colonial parasites. JVP killed Sinhalese and they themselves who are Sinhalese got killed.

6. Fran Diaz Says:
   May 1st, 2016 at 12:12 pm

   Christie,

   I doubt that Indians funded the JVP. At the time of the JVP led by Rohana Wijeweera, there were five classes held for the JVP students. One class was about INDIAN Expansionism. Also, the late 1980s second insurrection was in protest about the 13-A which was imposed by INDIA under duress on the then JRJ govt.
   So the JVP was not with the INDIAN agenda.

   Perhaps a person who knows more about the funding aspects can enlighten us.

7. Fran Diaz Says:
   May 1st, 2016 at 12:40 pm

   Another point to note is that the JVP’s first insurrection took place in 1971, at which time the island nation was still called Ceylon, and was yet under DOMINIAN status to Gt Britain, even though Independence was granted in 1948, afer WW II ended in 1945.

   It was only in 1972 that Ceylon was named Sri Lanka and the Dominion status was removed, and Lanka became a RE-PUBLIC. Sri Lanka continues as a member of the Commonwealth.

   Lesson Learnt seems to be to never get re-Colonised.

8. Christie Says:
   May 1st, 2016 at 8:05 pm

   සින්හලයේ වම නතිනම් සමාජවඩය පටන්ගත්තේ ඉන්දියානු පරපෝසිතයන්ය. 1927දී මොහන්දාස් කරම්චාන්ඩ් තමයි මුලපිරුවෙ.

   ඇන් ඇම් වගේ අයතමයි ඉන්දියානු පරපෝසිතයන්ගෙන් යැපුන අපේ මොල හෝදපු උන්.

9. Dilrook Says:
   May 1st, 2016 at 10:13 pm

   In 1971, it was the SLFP government that killed close to 20,000 Sinhala youth. UNP did it in 1989.

   JVP didn’t fight for anyone’s basic needs. Its leaders were living in luxury while poor Sinhala youth died. JVP was invited to Round Table Discussions but it opted to avoid it. A long period of surrender was given. Except a few, most saw it as a weakness. Victims of the JVP exceeded 6,000 civilians by July 1989 which is more than Sinhala civilians killed by the LTTE until then.

   Decapitation, forced curfews, hanging, genital mutilation, killing political opponents, dismemberment, election boycott (1988 election boycott enforced by the JVP mainly in the South helped Premadasa win with an overall voters’ turnout of just 55%), killing Buddhist monks, destruction of the electricity infrastructure and bombing the parliament are some acts of terror it did. Strangely all JVP’s victims were Sinhala Buddhists! Not many Tamils or Muslims suffered from JVP terror.

   JVP seems to have learnt the lesson and with the elimination of its iconic leaders, entered the democratic mainstream.

10. Dham Says:
    May 2nd, 2016 at 12:25 am

    Current JVP still consider Wijeweera as the leader. This means they don’t consider Wijeeweera as a man hiding in a bungalow pretending to be Attanayaka and conducting terrorist activities whilst the youth die for them as cowardly. This is the very basic flaw of current JVP even though they appear to be on the common man’s side, finding frauds with governments, accusing both parties ( which is reasonable).
    They should give up Wijeweera syndrome if they are to be accepted by people.

11. Christie Says:
    May 2nd, 2016 at 2:04 am

    Dilrook you are right, Indian funded JVP killed Sinhalese and they themselves got killed who were Sinhalese. Non of the Tamil JVPeers got killed. If it was only a few Tamil JVP got killed mainly by opponents of the JVP and the Government.

    Wijeweera got money from Colombo Indian Merchants. He went to hide among his protectors the Indian colonial parasites.

    I think Noel Mudalige alias Kumar, Kumar Gunaratnam, aliasA R M Dayal, alias Dakon alias Kumar etc etc was once a body guard of Wijeweera.

12. Fran Diaz Says:
    May 2nd, 2016 at 4:45 am

    Dilrook,

    Thank you for response re the JVP.

    As far as we know, in 1971, the JVP uprising was over Unemployment problems. No talks were held, as far as we know. The JVP by then had taken to the Peking Wing and were not with the Soviet Wing, as Wijeweera had switched sides, and Wijeweera was not allowed to enter Russia to continue his studies after his return to Lanka due to illness.
    We also do not know anything about the ‘living in luxury’ part by JVP leaders – it was only in the late 1980’s that Wijeweera had some property Upcountry. It was the JRJ govt that was lenient at the start with the JVP, not the Mrs B govt.

    I personally think that the fact that Sri Lanka was still a Dominion under Britain had a lot to do with no talks being held during the first Uprising by the JVP.

    I am not condoning the violence by the JVP. I am stating that talks ought to have been held, right from the start. I am also stating that the whole JVP matter must be looked at with honesty and clarity if we are to find lasting solutions to the problems in Lanka.

    To tell the truth, I myself as a young person in the 1970s, had grave mistrust and fear of the JVP and their activities. It is time to understand why they did what they did and lay the matter to rest.

    What do you think of the two reasons stated in the internet articles for their two uprisings – i.e. the first due to Unemployment and the second due to INDIA imposing the 13-A under Duress on the JRJ govt ?

13. Dilrook Says:
    May 2nd, 2016 at 8:26 pm

    The opposite of what Fran says is true in 1971.

    It was the SLFP government that selectively used the British connection in 1971. While it charged JVP activists for rebelling against the queen (this charge was possible because Sri Lanka was under the ultimate rule of the queen until 1972), it quickly realised this will give them access to the protection of the Privy Council. Then the authority of the Privy Council was removed by an act of parliament hurriedly in 1971. Thanks to the fear of the Privy Council by the SLFP government at the time of the insurrection, many JVP activists (and other suspects) managed to save their lives. This was not available to them in 1989.

    The JVP leader was living in luxury even at the time of his studies in a Soviet university. Facilities and the quality of education available to him was an extreme luxury to almost all Sri Lankans then. He was exceptionally intelligent and was going to complete his medical studies in record time (not to mention he was younger than 18 when he completed advanced level exam). He would have served the nation and people better had he kept his dream of becoming a doctor alive and made good use of the very rare opportunity given to him.

    JVP and SLFP had an understanding at the 1970 election not to contest against the SLFP, which would have helped the UNP. This helped the SLFP win the 1970 election despite winning an overall lesser percentage of votes than the UNP. Had the JVP fielded own candidates (in Sinhala majority areas), UNP would have won in 1970. JVP suddenly launched an assault on April 5, 1971 without any warning to the government or attempting to diffuse tensions peacefully. It was getting prepared for this for a very long time (Alles, AC). Had it followed open channels of communication before trying such violent action, many lives could have been saved. Unlike the LTTE’s war (1976 to 2009), the JVP violent act was not prolonged. Although unemployment and lack of political representation (among others) contributed to the frustration, ‘revolution’ against the state was what the JVP did after some of its leaders were brainwashed to do so in the Soviet Union. Similar events happened in other developing countries as well.

    In 1980s, the UNP government invited the JVP to Round Table Discussions, which the JVP ridiculed and rejected. Later, Sri Lanka Progressive Front (SLPF), including Ariya Bulegoda, held discussions with the government for an amicable de-escalation of the situation. However, the JVP was adamant it was going to ‘win’ what it called the ‘people’s struggle’. In 1994, JVP contested under the SLPF ticket won 1 seat in parliament.

    In addition to headstrong JVP leaders, the SLFP and UNP governments, politicians including self-styled “revolutionists” including Colvin, Gunawardanas (Viplavakari LSSP leader and dynasty), the Sangha and the civil society must have done much more to save these young lives. They all failed in their responsibility. Some opposition parties were hoping to capitalise on the lives lost to capture power (which they did in 1977 and 1994).

    JVP showed tremendous success once it entered the democratic mainstream for good. Although it lost its way since 2010, it was a deciding factor at the 2015 presidential election. JVP voted 544,000 votes at the 2015 General Election. Had Sirisena not received this vote bank in January 2015, he would not have won the election.

    As the two top leaders of the JO avoid blaming India for ETCA in strong terms, and fail to take a stronger stand against IMF, Wigneswaran and other crucial nationalist issues, the JVP is gaining ground once again at the expense of the JO. JVP will certainly foil JO’s attempt to win the next general election as a result. If JVP leaders adopt a more hard-line nationalist stand, if they can, they can totally foil the JO as both appeal to the Sinhala Buddhist vote base (in addition to traditional SLFP and UNP with a very strong presence within the community).

    Similarly the TNA (a coalition of parties formed by the LTTE in 2000 contesting as ITAK) keeps winning around 15 seats in parliament. Democratic means must be used at all times. Resorting to violence to gain political rights (and to supress opposition political rights) can never be justified.

14. Fran Diaz Says:
    May 3rd, 2016 at 1:17 pm

    Dilrook,
    thank you for response.

    ——–

    Let us examine some more how such an organisation such as the JVP came about to a Buddhist country.

    The resultant truth that comes out is that the RURAL Sinhala Buddhists were neglected right through the some 500 yrs of Colonial rule.

    The JVP is a result of that neglect, isn’t it ?

    Earlier, prior to the advent of Colonists, the use of Land in Sri Lanka was on a different basis. Lanka was mainly an Agrarian Society. The use of Land was that the people could grow produce but without ownership of land. The Buddhist Temples were gifted land (Nindagam) by the kings, but the people could use the land with no deeds to ownership. Some kind of Common Law usage was in place, where someone could use parts of the land and take its produce.
    However, after the advent of Colonists, Deeds of Ownership came in (Roman Dutch Law with some British Common Law).
    The British brought in the Land Ordinance to then Ceylon under the Queen of Gt Britain & the Empire.

    With the use of Land removed from the Rural People, there was a large void in terms of earning a living. The new laws brought in by foreigners with guns & foreign religions were alien to the local ways. The void created by taking away the Land from People is yet to be filled. Dr Sudath Gunasekara has written many an article to the Lankaweb about the land taken away from the Kandyan Peasants by Colonists for their vast plantations, the loss felt to this day.

    Wijeweera himself came from a poor background. His family home is still there in Kottegoda, Matara. I have seen it, passing by on our way on Galle Road. It is a very small house by the road.

15. Fran Diaz Says:
    May 3rd, 2016 at 1:28 pm

    contd ….

    Dr S.A. Wickremasinghe was a friend of Wijeweera’s father. His father fell ill after being attacked by political rivals and young Wijeweera was sponsored (probably by Dr S.A.W., to go to Moscow to do studies in Medicine). Yes, he was a bright student and got a distinction in the Russian language, and completed 3 yrs of Medical School, whilst also getting a distinction in Political Science. He returned to Lanka due to illness and switched to the Peking Wing. Russia did not allow Wijeweera’s return to there for studies.

    Not much had been done for the rural folk during SWRD times, other than restoration of the Sinhala Language. Thus the birth of the JVP. They unfortunately followed the rough and tough ‘take over’ instructions from the two Communist countries in the region.

    I am looking at the plight of the rural Sinhala/Buddhist youth who have been massacred twice in large numbers.

16. Fran Diaz Says:
    May 3rd, 2016 at 1:40 pm

    contd. ….

    I have never heard of that the JVP was invited for TALKS BY THE UNP. If I am mistaken, I apologise. Mrs B never invited the JVP for talks. In fact, sometime in the early 1980s a top cop told us that many files had been submitted to the Mrs B govt on the JVP activities, but NO action had been taken by the Mrs B, Marxist Coalition. Cannot help but feel that the Colombo land owning Marxists did not encourage early action – but I may be wrong. For some reason, the unrest was allowed to grow and over 400 young persons killed by govt forces.

    I am writing in so that such incidents never happen in Lanka. We have known the Sinhala/Buddhist villagers to be mostly decent, simple people.
    Killing rural Sinhala/Buddhists in large number : No one of importance protests. The only VIP who went to Geneva to protest was Mahinda Rajapakse. What an irony – today, the ‘Rathu Elephants’ wing of the JVP is against MR !!

    (Note: my computer kept sending in parts of the write up even before I pressed the Submit space – may be because I was typing fast – sorry !).

17. Fran Diaz Says:
    May 3rd, 2016 at 1:44 pm

    Correcting error : 4,000 to 5,000 JVP rural youth were killed by the Mrs B govt.

18. Dilrook Says:
    May 3rd, 2016 at 7:49 pm

    Sirima’s SLFP had an understanding with the JVP at the 1970 election to defeat the UNP. That gave enough encouragement to negotiate, if JVP opted. JVP opted for the then fashonable “revolution” as it succeeded around the world from Vietnam to Latin America. The onus was on the JVP to make attempts to reach out to the government. Its secret conduct made it even more difficult. Obviously they decided on the violent “revolution” and giving the government a hint would have foiled it. That may explain why they never reached out to the government.

    You are wrong on JR and Premadasa. They reached out to the JVP many times (I have given these details above). JVP leaders vowed not to “betray” their cause to the government.

    In addition to headstrong JVP leaders, the SLFP and UNP governments, politicians including self-styled “revolutionists” including Colvin, Gunawardanas (Viplavakari LSSP leader and dynasty), the Sangha and the civil society must have done much more to save these young lives. They all failed in their responsibility.

    Once the rebels were being defeated, there was no motivation for the government to go for peace talks. This was same with the LTTE. Such talks were held when the LTTE had the upper hand (1985, 1987, 1989, 1994, 2001-06).

    It is accepted that ordinary Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims all had grievances thanks to colonial plunder. This is a recurring theme in all colonial subjects around the world. A small section of both Sinhalese (less than 0.5%) and Tamils (less than 2%) resorted to violence in 1971 and 1976 to 2009, and failed. Muslims on the other hand were very clever to avoid such armed rebellion/war against the state and thrived. As a result they suffered least casualties and also supported by a generally higher population growth rate, Muslim population percentage increase from around 7% to 9% during this time.

    If not for Sinhala Only in 1956 (and reasonable use of Tamil Nadu language – both these came into being from the Official Language Act of 1956), the 1971 JVP insurrection would have succeeded. By Sinhala Only, people’s participation in state affairs increased from a dismal 4% to over 75%. In other words, most people participated in state affairs (though unsatisfactory due to the poverty of the country). Had it remain how it was, most Sri Lankans would be shut out of the state and they would have backed up the JVP to topple the government through the insurrection. This is what happened in some Asian and particularly African countries.

    The lesson learnt is, never to resort to violence and violent defiance contrary to national security interests. Those who don’t resort to violence and violent defiance contrary to national security interests, thrive. In wide contrast, what happened in 1956 was a bigger revolution, a perfectly peaceful one. If at all, we need this type of “revolutions”.

    Don’t ignore the electoral strength of the democratic JVP. As the two top leaders of the JO avoid blaming India for ETCA in strong terms, and fail to take a stronger stand against IMF, Wigneswaran and other crucial nationalist issues, the JVP is gaining ground once again at the expense of the JO. JVP will certainly foil JO’s attempt to win the next general election as a result. Both parties vye for the rural Sinhala Buddhist vote.

    The JVP has learnt the lesson. It is a waste of time to dispute that.

19. Dham Says:
    May 3rd, 2016 at 8:05 pm

    Cannot agree more with Dilrook. 1956 was the ONLY revolution, peaceful and effective.

    2009 is the 2nd one not peaceful but very effective. However that effectiveness was destroyed within months by idiotic Pandams who resorted to award kingship and resorted to worship. This could well be orchestrated by those being worshipped but I have no proof of that.

    A similar revolution to 1956 is badly needed now. If JVP can initiate that I will certainly join them. However, one of my prerequisites is to drop Wijeweera worshipping which may never happen.

20. Fran Diaz Says:
    May 4th, 2016 at 3:58 am

    Dilrook,

    thank you for additonal information.

    ——-

    I am glad you agree with me on the ill effects of Colonisation on the Rural Youth of Lanka. The aspect of POVERTY and lack of EMPLOYMENT due to LAND ACQUISITION & NEW LAWS brought in by COLONISTS (particularly the BRITISH), must be emphasised further to show the importance of LAND in a small country such as Sri Lanka, and never to make similar mistakes again.
    At this point, I would like to emphasize the idea of the UNP led Yahap to give 5,000 acre lots on 99 yr leases to Foreigners. A similar tragedy of yore in the making here !

    Though you have given some information about some attempts by the then UNP to have talks with the JVP, I have serious doubts about those efforts. There was NO publicity given to such efforts, if they were ever made. Moreover, as you say yourself, the Colombo ‘Revolutionists’ such as Colvin etc were English educated, landed proprietors and not true “Revolutionaries” at all. They were not of the Dr S.A. Wickremasinghe calibre. Also, Dr S.A. Wicks was not for violence. No real help/guidance ever came from the Colombo Marxists for the cause of the poor and unemployed rural youth of Lanka. Thus they were left to their own rough methods to deal with the ongoing problems.

    Mrs B’s SLFP lost the Elections to the UNP because of the crass manner in which they handled the JVP youth and also ruined the Economy. Basic needs of food, clothing etc were not available during her tenure in office. That was our personal experience and needs no comments.
    In my opinion, the UNP too handled the JVP matterbadly. The UNP was ultra pro-west as well as for the Capitalist type of Economy. In those days, due to the ongoing Cold War (1946-1991) the different Economic ideologies really mattered. The UNP under JRJ, to their credit, completed the Mahaweli Project, FTZ project and the Ports projects.
    The JVP cadre of those times saw no hope with the UNP, even if they made lame attempts at ‘talks’. I later thought that Wijeweera tried to emulate the Che Gueverra type of image.

    I state again that I do not condone Violence of any type. However, how small countries of Economic importance (due to Ports and strategic location in the Indian Ocean) get caught up in world politics, like it or not, and how Lanka govts must seek to protect and shield the PEOPLE of the country, particularly the Youth, from such ill effects in the future, is imperative.
    The JVP tragedy took place TWICE, the root cause being Colonisation of Lanka and Land being taken away from the People, depriving them of a sense of Security and wellbeing as well as Employment.

    To me the First Lesson Learnt here is NEVER to allow COLONIZATION of Lanka. It is the Colonists who brought the tragedy of the JVP to Lanka. It is pertinent to say that the tragedy of the LTTE was also brought to Lanka by Colonists.
    Colonists want to USE the land and the People for the gain of Colonists – they do not care how it is done or the costs to the Nations they invade.

    The Second Lesson here is that methods of Negotiation & Talks with protesting groups, and Laws must be put in place, to prevent such tragedies in the future.

    We need a trusted and mature leadership in govt., not a govt led by a person who participated in torture chambers for the JVP at Batalanda. Bad feeling there.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Disclaimer: The comments contained within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site. All views and opinions presented in this article are solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of LankaWeb.com.

This entry was posted on Saturday, April 30th, 2016. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response.