22A aims to achieve political stability – Minister Wijeyadasa

July 3rd, 2022

Courtesy Adaderana

The 22nd Amendment to the Constitution was presented to establish political stability in the country which is requested by most of the international agencies assisting Sri Lanka, Minister of Justice, Prison Affairs & Constitutional Reforms Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe says.

His views came in the backdrop where SLFP chairman Maithripala Sirisena criticized the 22nd constitutional amendment as an attempt to strengthen the powers of incumbent President Gotabaya Rajapaksa until the end of his tenure.

Speaking at a media briefing today (July 03), Minister Rajapakshe said they do not intend to protect any person or a family via the 22nd constitutional amendment.

We have taken necessary steps to protect the country through this [constitutional amendment. The 22A was approved after all political parties agreed to it.”

Speaking further, he said the Supreme Court has decided that the amendment presented bythe Opposition which includes 69 clauses covering 8 subject matters cannot be approved without a referendum.

Through the Bill that we have presented, we are avoiding a referendum,” he explained, adding that it has been presented in a way that none of the public representatives can object to it. They can object, however, their conscience knows that they are acting against the people’s desires.”

The condition set by the international organizations including IMF, the UN and the World Bank as well as the friendly nations that in talk with Sri Lanka at present, is that the law and order need to be established before obtaining their assistance to solve the country’s economic crisis, Minister Rajapakshe noted.

Until then, it is difficult to source assistance.”

The 21st Amendment to the Constitution is the constitutional amendments presented to the parliament by the main opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) in April as a private Bill.

It was later published in the government gazette and it was challenged in the Supreme Court.

Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, who was appointed the Minister of Justice, Prison Affairs & Constitutional Reforms, later presented a government Bill to the Cabinet of Ministers in his ministerial capacity, which is referred to as the 22nd amendment.

The Supreme Court, delivering its determination, ruled that the 21st amendment put forward by the SJB cannot proceed further without a public referendum.

In such a backdrop, the Cabinet of Ministers gave the approval to gazette the 22nd amendment presented by the Justice Minister.

Once the 22nd amendment is passed in parliament, it will become the 21st amendment as the SJB’s amendment cannot proceed further.

Companies to get weekly guaranteed fuel quota if paying in USD

July 3rd, 2022

Courtesy Adaderana

Any company or industry that capable of paying in US dollars can open a consumer account at the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) to obtain a weekly guaranteed fuel quota, Minister of Power & Energy Kanchana Wijesekara says.

They need to pay a month in advance and fuel will be issued either on a daily or weekly basis from the 12th of July, the minister said in a tweet.

Already paid customers will receive their quota starting from the aforementioned day, he added.

Schools to remain closed this week

July 3rd, 2022

Courtesy Adaderana

All government and government-approved private schools across the country will remain closed this week, the Ministry of Education says.

The decision was taken at a virtual meeting held with the Education Ministry officials, provincial secretaries and directors of education today.

The turnout of students, teachers and principals in schools and the Power & Energy Ministry’s fuel distribution process were taken up for discussion during the meeting.

Accordingly, it was decided that a week of holidays would be declared for government and government-approved private schools from 04th to 08th of July.

ජනපති ගෝඨාභය යටතේ අගමැති වෙන්න අනුර සූදානම්.. ඉන්ධන, ගෑස් ගැටළුව දින කිහිපයකින් විසදන්න පොරොන්දු වේ…

July 2nd, 2022

උපුටා ගැන්ම ලංකා සී නිව්ස්

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධුරය සහ කැබිනට් පත් මණ්ඩලය පත් කිරීමේ අවස්ථාව ලබා දෙන්නේ නම් කොටි කාලයකට ආණ්ඩුවක් පිහිටුවීමට තම තම පක්ෂය සුදානම් බව ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණේ නායක අනුර දිසානායක මහතා සඳහන් කරයි.

කෙටි කාලයක් සඳහා පිහිටුවන එම පාලනය තුළදී ඉතා කෙටිකලක් තුළ මෙරට මූලික ගැටළු වූ ඉන්ධන, ගෑස්, කිරිපිටි, විදුලිය ආදී ගැටලු ඉතා කෙටි කාලයක් තුළ විසඳා දීමට සූදානම් බවද හෙතෙම පැවසීය.

නමුත් එම පාලනය යටතේ සියලු ප්‍රශ්න විසඳන බවට තමන් නොපවසන බවද හෙතෙම පැවසීය.

අම්බලන්තොට නගරයේ දී පැවති ජාතික ජන බලවේගය විරෝධතා පාගමනක් අමතමින් හෙතෙම මේ බව කියා සිටියේය.

Japan says closely paying attention to SL’s difficult economic situation, ready to assist

July 2nd, 2022

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Japanese Ambassador to Sri Lanka Mizukoshi Hideaki said that Japan is ready to provide continuous
support to Sri Lanka while strengthening relations between the two countries, for Sri Lanka’s
economic program with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and for the development activities
of the country.

In a statement, the President’s Media Division said that during discussions between President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and the Japanese Ambassador at the President’s House in Colombo, today, Ambassador Mizukoshi Hideaki said that continuous efforts will be made to further strengthen the economic, social and cultural relations with Sri Lanka.

President Rajapaksa had during the discussions expressed his deep appreciation to Japan for their support to Sri Lanka.

Meanwhile, the Japanese Embassy in a statement on their FaceBook page said that Japan is closely paying attention to the current difficult economic situation in Sri Lanka and the severe humanitarian situation accompanied.

“Considering such a situation, the Government of Japan has decided to provide Emergency Grant Aid of USD three (3) million through UNICEF and WFP in order to provide medicine and food in a manner that would directly benefit the Sri Lankan people. Japan sincerely hopes that this assistance will be of help to overcome the hardship faced by the people of Sri Lanka, Japan’s long-standing friends,” the Embassy said.

The statement added that the government of Japan would like to consider its further contribution to Sri Lanka in consultation with the Government of Sri Lanka and other developing partners, while giving attention to the situation of Sri Lanka and the negotiation progress between Sri Lanka and IMF.

Lessons for Sri Lanka : “psychological operations in guerilla warfare“ CIA Manual used in Nicaragua

July 1st, 2022

Shenali D Waduge

The reason US invaded countries of Latin America for 39 years was bananas. However, the Nicaraguan operation was different. US was involved in 2 covert operations in Nicaragua & Iran (1984-1987) The 1stoperation was to use a Honduran rebel group called Contras against the Nicaraguan Government of Sandinista. The 2nd covert operation was to sell arms to Iran to release American hostages held in Lebanon. The profits from the arms sales to Iran was used to support the Contras to overthrow the Nicaraguan government via third parties and private funds. It is the propaganda aspect used that Sri Lanka must look at.

US occupied Nicaragua from 1912 to 1932 & left after replacing a pro-US trained Somoza Garcia who took power in 1936 after murdering Sandino. Garcia regime held power for 43 years after which Sadinista took power in 1979 & declared emergency, expropriated land & businesses owned by old dynastic family, nationalized banks, mines, abolished old courts, denounced churches & nullified the constitution. Naturally, US did not take these actions lightly & began supporting those that were anti-Sandinista. These became known as the Contras.

President Reagan’s democracy decade” resulted in over 80 publicity stunts to influence public & congressional opinion to influence aid to Contras. However, many in Congress were skeptical, yet CIA was given a bigger role to train & fund Contras & twist propaganda in favor of the covert operation.

The National Security Act 26 July 1947 created the National Security Council & CIA enabling them to work around Congress & frame policy of US with third party actors. Both ended up performing covert operations bypassing State Dept.

The 1985 Intelligence Authorization Act outlawed US Govt agencies from soliciting money from third-party countries to fund Contras, it allowed US State dept to solicit funds as humanitarian assistance”! That was how loopholes were created and Nicaraguan Refuge Fund emerged and $12m was raised out of which $2.7m went to the Contras.

Lt. Col. Oliver North was the Deputy Director of Political-Military Affairs for NSC. It was Oliver North who suggested to overcharge Iran for weapons sold to them & to use the surplus to fund Contras.

In 1985 – $14m was given to Contras as humanitarian assistance”.

In 1986 $100m aid was given to Contras.

CIA supplied money to Contras via Saudi Arabia, Taiwan & Iran. An airstrip was built in Costa Rica to send supplies to the Contras – that ended when Sandinistas shot down the plan on 5 Oct 1986 capturing the US pilot. CIA also undertook air attacks on Nicaraguan storage tanks (destroying fuel), medicines. The same tactics used in US wars in Middle East & Africa.

CIA aircraft bombed Nicaraguan international airport while CIA operatives mined Nicaraguan harbors. This operation was recommended by Lt. Col. Oliver North!

Iran-Contra Hearings – Oliver North Testimony (1987)

CIA involvement in Contra cocaine trafficking Crack 2020 Full

The CIA 98 page manual used for Nicaragua was title Psychological Operations in Guerilla Warfare”  https://irp.fas.org/cia/guerilla.htm

This was used to train, arm, fund the Contras to fight the Nicaraguan govt. The manual was revealed only in 1984.

https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2017/dec/18/cia-contras-manual/

The manual included

  • Armed propaganda teams use of deceit, intimidation & violence
  • Assassinations – Neutralize”
  • Taught Contras how to interact with civilian population
  • Taught ‘rules of engagement’
  • How to demonstrate & elevate demonstrations into clashes & provoke riots & shootings leading to killings & these deaths were to be treated as martyrs. This scenario was to enable to take advantage against the government & create bigger issues for the government.
  • The manual recommended selective use of armed force for psyop – carefully planned targets – judges, police officials, tax collectors etc
  • The key was to get the people to ‘concur’ by canvassing affected populace and promoting the ‘affected’.

The CIA also used Freedom Fighters Manual” (15 page) airdropped to Contra rebels and average citizens on how to work against the government.

The manual guided how to cause civil disruptions & initial instructions were simple, harmless & without risk – calling sick to work, leaving lights & faucets on (the aim was to decrease production & hinder economy)

Thereafter the instructions progressed to the next stage – people asked to steal food from the government, release livestock from farming, cooperatives, make false reports of fires & crimes, severe telephone lines, cables, disable vehicles,

The end of the manual gave violent instructions with diagrams showing how to make Molotov cocktails to use as firebombs on police stations, how to burn fuel supplies, how to perforate fuel tanks with ice picks.

Americans & the world came to know of US-Iran ties after ousting of Iran’s Mossadegh in 1953 & placing Shah till 1979 Ayatollah Khomeini came to power severing ties with US resulting in the US embassy seize & 53 hostages on 4 Nov 1979, embargo against Iran resulted in more US hostages in 1984, then came the Iran-Iraq war, the US arms deal with Iran was brokered by Saudi businessmen Adnan Khashoggi & $1m worth of arms was sent to Iran on 20 Aug 1985. According to Brown University, of the $1m – only $150,000 was spent on weapons the remaining $850,000 were for the Contras.

2 Lebanese newspapers broke the story about the Iran arms deal in November 1986 & US became exposed. Oliver North faced criminal charges while Pointdexter resigned as National Security Advisor.  The Tower Commission & the Majority Report of the Congressional Committee Investigating the Iran-Contra Affair simply faulted the President & the whole scandal was hushed up as just another affair.

In 1984 Nicaragua took US to the ICC claiming $17billion & won. US was ordered to pay reparations but hasn’t.

The ICJ held that the US was:

  • ‘in breach of its obligations under customary international law not to use force against another State’
  • not to intervene in its affairs”
  • not to violate its sovereignty”
  • not to interrupt peaceful maritime commerce”
  • in breach of its obligations under Article XiX of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce & Navigation between the Parties signed in 1956.

The ICJ statements included:

Finds that the United States of America, by producing in 1983 a manual entitled Operaciones sicológicas en guerra de guerrillas, and disseminating it to contra forces, has encouraged the commission by them of acts contrary to general principles of humanitarian law”.

Nicaragua is today led by a former Sandinista leader – President Daniel Ortega.

It is a case study in itself that mighty US would go after a nation of just 6.5million people with propaganda that tapped over 100 editorial writers, over 1500 lectures & panel discussions, 107 religious organizations, reporters, lobbyists & even members of Congress. Much of the propaganda was based on lies told well and in such a way that it was believable and believed.

These are all lessons for Sri Lanka …. But most of the educated” in Sri Lanka seem to think no foreign involvement or interference prevails in Sri Lanka’s internal affairs & nothing of the propaganda types that US manuals replicate in all of the nations that are geopolitically important to them are also rolled out in Sri Lanka.

Shenali D Waduge

THE PRIVATE SECTORS OF SRI LANKA IS EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT

July 1st, 2022

BY EDWARD THEOPHILUS

According to the general understanding, the government sector and the private sector are equally responsible for the management of the economy, however, since the 1956 election, the responsibility of the management of the economy was unequally transferred to the public sector and this process was incurred by the nationalization of private enterprises, controlling the private investments and the spreading of the concept of socialism in the country that discouraged private investors and massively created investment problems in the country. The macroeconomic problems of the country were related to unemployment, distribution of income, increasing population more than the size of the country and many other problems. The changes in the concept of economic management have been significantly harmed and the policies of all governments elected after 1956 have supported misguided policies than addressing the issues.

The collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s and the promotion of private investments in Russia and China since the 1990s clearly showed how private sectors are responsible for economic management in a country. However, this truth was not understood by stupid policymakers in Sri Lanka and they advised the government to take massive responsibility for investment in the public sector and a large volume of investment through misguided policies turned to the public sector.

The brushing aside investment in the private sector promoted attitude problems among Sri Lankans and it could be observed that negative attitudes of people when you talk to Sri Lankans. The truth is the investing capacity of the public sector is very lower but Sri Lankans put faith in the public sector disregarding the promotion of the private sector.  Compare to many Asian African and Latin American countries Sri Lankans have lower-level thinking concerning knowledge of English, the school studied and many matters. These are called attitude problems. I observed when I was working in the Bank of Ceylon before 1990, that graduates officers from villages were contempt by officers who studied in Colombo schools who had little knowledge of the subject area. The major reason for this situation was the attitude problems of people who studied in Colombo schools. The administrator of Colombo schools and old boys and girls socies of Colombo schools have been continuing the negative thinking.

The private sector in Sri Lanka is equally responsible economic management of the country. To achieve this, the government must privatize all enterprises and give responsibility to private investors, and the government should work as a regulatory authority. In this situation, the government should not be playing a double role as a regulator and market player in various areas. What is happening in Sri Lanka is the government plays the role of market player and regulator. 

In certain areas of the economy where the private sector could not make investments, the government can give investment support to private investors. The responsibility of investment would transfer to private entrepreneurs and the government could support private investors in a various way. 

Cricket Australia must take up DRS authorship issue with ICC and resolve it on footing of fair play and justice

July 1st, 2022

Shenali Waduge 

The Decision Review System known as UDRS or DRS or the Player Referral concept is in vogue not only in cricket but in many other sports activities where the Third Umpire plays the role of an Appeal Judge. Who came up with this concept & when is a question the International Cricket Committee (ICC) has consistently failed to answer despite incessant calls to do so. If every song has a singer and every lyric has an author, the DRS too must have emerged from somebody’s brain.

Sri Lankan Attorney Senaka Weeraratna is claiming authorship of the concept underlying DRS and his idea of ‘Player Referral’ was first published in the Australian” national newspaper on 25th March 1997, and thereafter in leading newspapers and journals of cricket playing nations. Not stopping there, he has made numerous appeals to the international cricketing body as well as the Sri Lanka (SLC) cricket board.

Before gaining accolades for his concept, Senaka Weeraratna may enter the Guinness Book for his patience in seeking justice for a concept he has conceived and authored. Given that the idea was first published in an Australian National Newspaper, this appeal is for the Australian newspapers & the Australian Cricket Board to take up the deserving case of Senaka Weeraratna & give the invention of DRS due recognition & declare him the author of the DRS system.

It is sad and shocking that Sri Lanka Cricket ( SLC) & a plethora of internationally recognized Sri Lankan cricketers some now aspiring to be Presidential candidates have also shied away from taking up the case of Senaka Weeraratna in his efforts to be recognized for seeding the concept of DRS system. If these former captains do not wish to speak for the cause of one Sri Lankan whose achievement will only be another feather on the cap of achievements to Sri Lanka’s cricket glories, how can they be of any use in politics to work on behalf of the people of Sri Lanka.

Some former top officials of the Sri Lanka Cricket Board are said to have adopted the view that taking up the case of Senaka Weeraratna with the ICC will upset” the ICC, and in turn harm their relationship with the ICC at all levels.

This treacherous stance of former SLC officials in return for perks and other personal favours from the ICC is no different to the shameless appeasement policy followed by Sri Lanka’s foreign ministry.

Is Sri Lanka Cricket – its officials & its captains past and present reluctant to take up the cause of Senaka Weeraratna as it may impact on their perks & other cosy relationships that they currently enjoy vis a vis the ICC?

However, ICC is duty bound to disclose the source of the brainchild behind the DRS. ICC cannot indefinitely hide this fact.

Senaka Weeraratna is claiming he is the brainchild of the DRS ‘player referral’ system. If he is not the author, ICC must disclose the name of the true author. This is a legitimate and fair request. The world of cricket has a moral right to know how the ICC arrived at the DRS. 

The ICC can be presumed to have had constructive notice of Senaka Weeraratna’s letter to the ‘Australian’ ( March 25, 1997) as it was published in a mainstream news paper of one of World’s leading cricket playing nations.

This date antedates the date on when  Tennis acquired the line calling mechanism (2004) which has been cited by a former CEO of ICC ( Dave Richardson) as the source of inspiration for DRS.

If there is no alternate party claiming to be the author, what is holding the ICC from accepting Senaka Weeraratne has the author of the DRS system?

Is it because he is not white? The cricket-loving public have gone beyond colonial racism and such discrimination should not exist in cricket or any type of sports.

The Govt. of Sri Lanka must step in without any further delay and the Minister of Sports must direct the President of SLC unhesitatingly to back the Sri Lanka’s candidate, Senaka Weeraratna in obtaining due recognition and credit from the ICC.

SLC cannot remain neutral or indifferent on a matter concerning the claim of a Sri Lankan to credit from the ICC. SLC must treat the DRS as an achievement of a fellow countryman of Sri Lanka and be unhesitatingly proud of it.

We appreciate the arrival of the Australian Cricket Team to Sri Lanka amidst an economic crisis and would like to have at least the governing body of Cricket Australia together with the ‘Australian’ Newspaper that first published Senaka Weeraratna’s concept in 1997 to assist in finally getting the ICC to formally recognize the authorship of the DRS.

25 years have passed since 1997 with no one knowing who came up with this player referral concept which has been adopted ( or stolen) by the ICC and renamed as DRS.

The Player Referral concept being the invention of a Sri Lankan, is now being used not only in cricket but in other sports as well.  Neither the Govt. of Sri Lanka nor the SLC not being proud of this singular achievement of a Sri Lankan with no other claimant in the would to compete with Weeraratna’s claims, is another clear illustration of that well known adage ‘ A prophet is never honoured in his own country.

If the Duckworth Lewis rule in rain affected one day international cricket matches can be named after the two co – authors, equity demands that DRS likewise be named after its author.

DRS system must be called the Senaka Weeraratna Decision Review System.

Let us hope the new Sports Minister Roshan Ranasinghe will have the foresight to do justice by Senaka Weeraratna and gain prestige for Sri Lanka as a result.

Shenali Waduge 

Sri Lanka seeks greater cooperation in the food processing and dairy sectors with India

July 1st, 2022

Gamini Sarath Godakanda

Sri Lanka and India agreed to explore further avenues towards greater cooperation in the food processing and dairy sectors, when Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner to India, Milinda Moragoda met with India’s Minister of Food Processing Industries Shri  Pashupati Kumar Paras today (01 July) in New Delhi.

At the outset, Minister Paras accorded a warm welcome to High Commissioner Moragoda and said that he and his government led by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi are always ready to help Sri Lanka in these difficult times.

While thanking the Minister, High Commissioner Moragoda stressed the importance of establishing close linkages between India and Sri Lanka in various sectors under the Minister’s purview, in particular the dairy industry. The High Commissioner observed that import of milk powder from India including through the existing credit line would contribute to increase nutrition levels among children in Sri Lanka.

The Minister and the High Commissioner agreed that cooperation could commence with the dairy sector, and it could later be expanded into other sectors falling under the supervision of the Ministry of Food Processing Industries. High Commissioner Moragoda said that the ultimate objective of these efforts would be greater economic integration of the two countries.    

With a view to looking into the way forward for cooperation in these sectors, it was decided to form a study group that would comprise officials from the Ministry of Food Processing Industries and the High Commission of Sri Lanka as well as other relevant stakeholders both in India and Sri Lanka. It was also decided to have the first meeting of the study group soon.

Minister Paras who hails from the State of Bihar is the incumbent President of the Rashtriya Lok Janshakti Party, which is part of the ruling National Democratic Alliance led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He has been a member of the Bihar Legislative Assembly seven times since 1977 and had served thrice as a Minister in the State.

Secretary to the Ministry of Food Processing Industries Smt. Anita Praveen, senior officials of the Ministry as well as senior diplomatic officers of the High Commission of Sri Lanka in New Delhi also attended the meeting. 

තෙල් ඉල්ලන්න කටාර් ගිය කංචන තහනම් සංවිධානයක් ලෙස නම් කර තිබූ කටාර් චැරිටි තහනම ඉවත් කිරීමට පොරොන්දු වෙලා 

July 1st, 2022

Lanka Lead News

මේ දිනවල කටාරයේ සංචාරයක නිරත වන විදුලිබල හා බලශක්ති අමාත්‍ය කාන්චන විජේසේකර මහතා ඊයේ(30) දිනයේ දී කටාර් චැරිටි සංවිධානයේ නියෝජිතයන් මුණ ගැසී කළ සාකච්ඡාවක් අතර තුර අදාල සංවිධානයට එරෙහිව ලංකාව පනවා ඇති තහනම ඉවත් කිරීමට තීරණය කර තිබෙන බව එම නියෝජිතයන්ට දැනුම් දී ඇති බව වාර්තාවේ.

මත භේදයට තුඩු දුන් කටාර් චැරිටි සංවිධානය 2019 වසරේ දි ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහ්තාගේ සෘජු මැදිහත්වීම යටතේ රජය විසින් තනහම් කරන ලදී.

එවකට පොලිසිය භාර අමාත්‍යවරයා වූ ආචාර්ය සරත් වීරසේකර මහතා පාර්ලිමේන්තුව හමුවේ ප්‍රකාශ කර සිටියේ, කටාර් චැරිටි, ත්‍රස්ත සංවිධානයක් ලෙස නම් කරන බවයි.

කටාර් චැරිටි සංවිධානයට එරෙහිව රජය එල්ල කළ එම චෝදනාව උපයෝගී කරගනිමින් නීතීඥ හිජාස් හිස්බුල්ලා ත්‍රස්තවාදය වැළැක්වීමේ පනත යටතේ අත් අඩංගුවට ගෙන රදවා තබා ගැනීමට ද රජය කටයුතු කළේය.

හිටපු අමාත්‍ය සරත් වීරසේකර පාර්ලිමේන්තුව හමුවේ ප්‍රකාශ කර සිටියේ හිජාස් හිස්බුල්ලාගේ සභාපතීත්වයෙන් යුතු සේව් ද පර්ල් නම් සංවිධානයට, කටාර් චැරිටි වෙතින් රුපියල් මිලියන 13 ක් ලැබී ඇති බවයි.එහිදි අමාත්‍යයවරයා වැඩිදුරටත් පවසා සිටියේ, කටාර් චැරිටි ත්‍රස්ත සංවිධානයක් බවත්, එම සංවිධානයෙන් මුදල් ලබා තිබෙන නීතීඥ හිජාස් හිස්බුල්ලා ත්‍රස්ත ක්‍රියා සම්බන්ධයෙන් සැකකරුවෙකු බවයි.

මේ අතර එවකට රජය කටාර් චැරිටි සංවිධානය සම්බන්ධයෙන් ගත් ක්‍රියා මාර්ග මෙන්ම නීතීඥ හිජාස් හිස්බුල් ත්‍රස්තවාදය වැළැක්වීමේ පනත යටතේ අත් අඩංගුවට ගෙන රදවා තබා ගැනීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් සංවිධානය ඇතුළු ජාත්‍යන්තර සංවිධාන රැසක් දැඩි විරෝධයක් රජයට එරෙහිව එල්ල කිරීමටද කටයුතු කර තිබුණි.

සාෆි නිදහස් කලායැයි බොරු ප්‍රවෘත්ති පල කිරීම් ගැන සාක්ෂි ඉදිරිපත් කරන්න – කුරුණෑගල මහේස්ත්‍රාත් 

July 1st, 2022

Lanka Lead News

කැමැත්ත නොමැතිව ගැබිනි මවුවරුන්‌ වඳ භාවයට පත්‌ කිරීම හා ඒ සඳහා පෙළඹවීම ඇතුළු චෝදනා එල්ල වී ඇති වෛද්‍ය සෙයිගු සිහබ්ඳදීන්‌ මොහොමඩ්‌ සාෆි නමැත්තා තම අධිකරණය විසින්‌ නිදොස්‌ කොට නිදහස්‌ කර ඇති බවට මාධ්‍ය මගින්‌ අසත්‍ය ප්‍රවෘත්ති පළ කර ඇති බව ‘සනාථ කිරීම සඳහා අවශ්‍ය සාක්ෂි අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත්‌ කරන ලෙස කුරුණෑගල මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්‌ බන්දුල ගුණරත්න මහතා 24 දා  අගතියට පත්‌ පාර්ශ්වයට නියෝග කළේය.

එම සැකකාර වෛද්‍යවරයාට එරෙහිව අධිකරණය හමුවේ පවතින නඩුවේ විමර්ශන මේ දක්වා අවසන්‌ වී හෝ නඩු විභාගය අවසන්‌ කර නොමැතිව තිබියදීත්‌ ඇතැම්‌ ජනමාධ්‍ය මගින්‌ සියලු චෝදනා ඔප්පු කිරීමට නොහැති වීම නිසා වෛද්‍ය ෂාෆි නිදොස්‌ කොට නිදහස්‌ කර ඇති බවට” ප්‍රවෘත්ති පළකිරීම අධිකරණයට කළ අපහසායක්‌ වන බැවින්‌ ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන්‌ විමර්ශනයක්‌ කරන්නැයි අගතියට පත්‌ පාර්ශ්වය වෙනුවෙන්‌ පෙනීසිටි නීතිඥ චානක අබේවික්‍රම කළ කරුණු දැක්වීම සලකා බැලූ මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්වරයා එම නියෝගය කළේය.

24 දා එම නඩුව කැඳවූ අවස්ථාවේදී අධිකරණය ඇමතූ නීතිඥ චානක අබේවික්‍රම මහතා මෙසේ ද අධිකරණයට පැවසීය.

ස්වාමිනි මෙම නඩුවේ සැකකාර වෛද්‍යවරයාට එල්ල වී තිබුණේ ඉතා බරපතළ චෝදනා. රුපියල්‌ 500ක අල්ලසක්‌ ලබාගත්‌ බවට චෝදනා එල්ල වන විටත්‌ විමර්ශන අවසන්‌ චනතුරු රාජ්‍ය සේවයෙන්‌ වැඩ තහනමට ලක්කරනවා. මේ සැකකරුට එරෙහිව රුපියල්‌ කෝටි 44ක මුදලක්‌ උපයා ගැනීම සම්බන්ධයෙන්‌ මුදල්‌ විශුද්ධිකරණය වැළැක්වීමේ පනත යටතේ චෝදනා එල්ල චී තිබියදීත්‌ ඔහු වැඩ තහනමට ලක්‌ නොකර අනිචාර්ය නිවාඩු යැව්වා. මෙලෙස සිදුවූයේ ඔහුට තිබෙන දේශපාලන සබඳතා නිසයි. වැඩ තහනම්‌ නොකර අනිවාර්ය නිවාඩු යැවීම නිසා ඔහුට හිඟ වැටුප්‌ ලැබුණා. පසුගිය 13වැනිදා ඔහුට ඒ චෙක්පත භාරදුන්‌ පසුව චෝදනා ඔප්පු වී නොමැති නිසා ඔහුව නිදොස්‌ කොට නිදහස්‌ කර ඇති බවට ජනමාධ්‍ය කිහිපයක ප්‍රවෘත්ති පළ වුණා.

මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්වරයා – ඒ බව සනාථ කරන්න අවශ්‍ය ලේඛන තිබෙනවාද? තිබෙනවා නම්‌ අධිකරණ රෙජිස්ට්‍රාර්වරයාට භාරදෙන්න.

නීතිඥ චානක අබේවික්‍රම මහතා – තිබෙනවා ස්වාමිනි අගතියට පත්‌ පාර්ශ්වය ඒවා අධිකරණයට භාරදීමට සූදානම්‌. ඒ අනුව විමර්ශනයක්‌ කර එකී මාධ්‍ය ආයතනවලට එරෙහිව අධිකරණයට අපහාස කිරීමේ චෝදනාව යටතේ නඩු පැවරීමට පියවර ගන්නා ලෙස ඉල්ලා සිටිනවා.”

එහිදී සැකකාර වෛද්‍යවරයාගේ ක්‍රියා කලාපය නිසා වඳභාවයට හා මදසරුභාවයට පත්‌ කාන්තාවන්‌ කොළඹ විශ්වවිද්‍යාලයේ වෛද්‍යය විද්‍යා පීඨයේ මහාචාර්යවරුන්‌ ප්‍රමුඛ විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය මණ්ඩලයට ඉදිරිපත්‌ කිරීමේ කටයුතු ලබන අගෝස්තු 5 වන දිනට පෙර අවසන්‌ කරන ලෙසට අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවට නියෝග කළ මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්වරයා එදිනට විමර්ශනවල ප්‍රගතිය අධිකරණයට වාර්තා කරනා ලෙසට ද නියෝග කළේය.

නීතිඥ ප්‍රේම්‌ බී. තෙන්නකෝන්‌ මහතා සැකකරු වෙනුවෙන්‌ පෙනීසිටි අතර නීතිඥ නිරුෂි උයන්වත්ත, නීතිඥ සමන්‌ බණ්ඩාර දිසානායක යන නීතිඥවරුන්‌ සමඟ නීතිඥ චානක අබේවික්‍රම මහතා අගතියට පත්‌ පාර්ශ්වය වෙනුවෙන්‌ පෙනීසිටියේය. සැකකාර වෛද්‍යවරයා ද අධිකරණය හමුවේ පෙනී සිටියේය. රටේ පවතින තත්ත්වය අනුව සැකකාර වෛද්‍යවරයාට පනවා ඇති ඇප කොන්දේසි ලිහිල්‌ කරන ලෙස සැකකරුගේ නීතිඥවරයා අධිකරණයෙන්‌ ඉල්ලාසිටි අතර ඒ අනුව අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව හමුවේ පෙනීසිටීමේ ඇප කොන්දේසිය ඉවත්‌ කිරීමට මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්වරයා නියෝග කළේය.

කෙසේ නමුත්‌ අධිකරණය නියම කරන දිනවලදී අධිකරණය හමුවේ පෙනී සිටීමට අපොහොසත්‌ වුවහොත්‌ එකී ඇප ලිහිල්‌ කිරීමේ කොන්දේසිය අවලංගු කරන බවට ද මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්වරයා සැකකරුට අවවාද කළේය.

Proposed Lankan constitutional amendment lets President Gotabaya off the hook

July 1st, 2022

By P.K.Balachandran Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo July 1 (Counterpoint): The Gazetted draft of the 22 nd. Amendment (22A) of the Sri Lankan constitution, which will be presented to parliament in the coming week, is a compromise between the interests of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. It is also designed to maintain the stability needed to tide over the current economic crisis and to avoid a referendum.

If passed by parliament, by the required two-thirds majority, the draft 22A will enter the constitution as the 21 st.,Amendment (21A).       

Constitutional Council and Independent Commissions

In a significant change, the draft 22A re-establishes the independent Constitutional Council (CC) to replace the Parliamentary Council of the 20 th.Amendment (20A). The CC will, in turn, appoint the Chairmen and members of the various Independent Commissions (ICs) which would make key appointments and oversee the work of sectors assigned to each.

The Independent Commissions are: the Elections Commission, Public Service Commission, Police Commission, Judicial Commission, Finance Commission, Bribery and Corruption Commission, Delimitation Commission, Human Rights Commission, Audit Service Commission and  National Procurement Commission.

The CC comprises the parliament Speaker (who will be its chairperson), the Prime Minister, the  Leader of the Opposition, one Member of Parliament (MP) appointed by the President, 5 MPs comprising one ruling party MP, one MP from the party of the Leader of the Opposition, three non-MPs appointed by the Speaker in consultation with the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition and approved by a majority of MPs in parliament, and one MP from a party other than the one represented by the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition.

All appointments should reflect the pluralistic character of Sri Lankan society. Non-MPs should be persons of repute and integrity. CC members will serve for three years. Vacancies will have to be filled in 14 days.

It is the President who makes appointments to the CC. But the 22A enjoins the President to make the appointments within 14 days of receiving recommendations from the CC. If he fails to do that, the appointments will be deemed to have been made as recommended by the CC.

In case parliament is dissolved, the Speaker, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition will continue to be members of the CC till a new parliament is elected and a government assumes office.

The CC’s nominations are necessary for high offices such as Attorney General, the Governor of the Central Bank, the Auditor General, the Ombudsman, and the Secretary General of parliament. The CC shall meet at least twice in a month. The quorum is five. Its decisions should generally be by consensus or be approved at least by five members.

President’s Powers  

Through the 22A, the Prime Minister gains authority over the President, but he will not be able to exercise the new provisions during the tenure of the current (the ninth) parliament. The new provisions will come into effect only from the next of 10 th. parliament. This is a major concession to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and the votaries of a strong Executive Presidency, like the Sinhala nationalists including the present Justice Minister and the architect of the 22A, Wijesdasa Rajapakshe.

The 22A says that the President will take his decisions on appointments to the council of ministers and the distribution of portfolios among the ministers on the advice of the Prime Minister” and not in consultation with the Prime Minister, where he considers such consultation is necessary” as is the case now under the 20 th.Amendment.

But there is a condition attached to this. The above mentioned stipulation will not come into play during the life of the current parliament. During the life of the current parliament, the President may  consult” the Prime Minister only if, in his opinion, such a consultation is necessary. This provision constitutes a major concession by the Prime Minister Wickremesinghe to President Gotabaya.

The other concession made to the President is that he shall be entitled to hold the Defense portfolio. In the case of the absence or exist of a minister, the President can take over that ministry,  but only for 14 days.

Prime Minister’s Term of Office

The draft 22A says that the Prime Minister shall stay in office throughout the period the cabinet is in office, unless he resigns or ceases to be a Member of Parliament. However, from the time the 22A is enacted till the dissolution of the ninth parliament, the President can remove the Prime Minister from his office, if in his opinion, the Prime Minister has lost the confidence of the parliament.

Ministerial Secretaries’ Tenure  

At present, the Secretaries to the Ministries quit the moment the cabinet resigns or is dissolved. But under the proposed 22A, they would not be required to quit but await the appointment of a new cabinet.

Critique   

The draft 22A has the support of those who favor the present order with Gotabaya Rajapaksa continuing as Executive President and Ranil Wickremesinghe continuing as Prime Minister. They feel that the existing system has to be upheld for the sake of stability considered necessary to get desperately-needed humanitarian and financial aid from other countries. They fear that an opposition divided ideologically and politically will not provide a stable government and successfully operate the government machinery without a strong Executive Presidency which is immune to the vagaries of party politics, characteristic of the Westminster system. They feel that to solve the tremendous and unprecedented economic crisis, Sri Lanka needs the undivided attention of a strong center represented by the Executive Presidency.

The critics of the 22A however say that it is a big let-down, in the context of the public demand for a democratic system to end the  system of government based on concentration of power in the hands of one person or one family and its cronies. These critics expected the 22A to be a full resurrection of the 19A of 2015. But it is only a pale shadow of the 19A, says Constitutional  expert, Dr.Jayampathy Wickramaratne.

In a short note issued on Thursday, the Center of Policy Alternatives (CPA) said: The Gazetted 22A does not curtail the powers of the President nor introduce checks and balances in any meaningful manner, contrary to the demands of the people of Sri Lanka. In the absence of any genuine attempt to address the inherent problems of governance, this attempt at reform will only worsen the existing political and economic crisis and destroy whatever little remaining faith citizens might have in constitutional governance.”

CPA has carefully considered the contents of the Bill and notes that the Bill does not revert the Constitution to the structure of government that prevailed under the Nineteenth Amendment (2015-19).”

Dr.Wickramaratne regrets that the President will retain his powers for the duration of the present parliament, though he is allowed to hold only the Defense portfolio under the 22A. Any other ministry could beheld only for 14 days. The experts also regrets that there is no specific provision for the representation of the small parties in the CC and to ensure the pluralist nature of Sri Lankan society.

The main opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya’s proposal for a 21A was a radical departure from the existing 20A and called a fundamental change in the constitution including the abolition of the Executive Presidency. But as expected, the Supreme Court said that the SJB’s 21A would need a two thirds majority in parliament and a referendum.

President Gotabaya and Prime Minister Wickremesinghe felt that the country could not afford a referendum under the present economic and financial conditions and got the Justice Minister Wijedasa Rajapakshe to draft an amendment which will not require a referendum.

Given the SJB’s opposition to the 22A draft, it is unlikely to vote for it in parliament. The National Peoples’ Power led by the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), and the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) would also oppose it. But the 11-party group is likely to support it as it wants a strong Executive Presidency.

The million dollar question is whether the 22A will get the two-thirds majority needed for a constitutional amendment..

Bankrupt Sri Lanka’s inflation jumps beyond 50%

July 1st, 2022

Sri Lankans have taken to the streets over an acute shortage of essentials including food, fuel and medicines – Copyright AFP –

Sri Lanka’s inflation hit a ninth consecutive record in June, official data showed Friday, rising to 54.6 percent a day after the IMF asked the bankrupt nation to rein in galloping prices and corruption.

It was the first time the increase in the Colombo Consumer Price Index (CCPI) crossed the psychologically important 50 percent mark, according to the department of census and statistics.

The figures came hours after the International Monetary Fund urged Sri Lanka to contain spiralling inflation and address corruption as part of efforts to salvage the troubled economy, which has been ravaged by a foreign exchange crisis.

The IMF ended 10 days of in-person discussions with Sri Lankan authorities in Colombo on Thursday following the country’s request for a possible bailout.

The CCPI has been setting new monthly highs since October, when year-on-year inflation stood at just 7.6 percent. In May it reached 39.1 percent.

The rupee has lost more than half its value against the US dollar this year.

Private economists say consumer prices are rising even faster than shown in official statistics.

According to an economist at Johns Hopkins university, Steve Hanke, who tracks price increases in the world’s troublespots, Sri Lanka’s current inflation is 128 percent, second only to Zimbabwe’s 365 percent.

Faced with an acute energy shortage, Sri Lanka is observing a shutdown of non-essential state institutions for two weeks, along with the closure of schools to reduce commuting.

The country’s 22 million people have been enduring acute shortages of essentials — including food, fuel and medicines — for months.

Protests are continuing outside President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s office demanding his resignation over the unprecedented economic turmoil and his mismanagement.

Sri Lanka went to the IMF in April after the country defaulted on its $51 billion external debt.

Read more: https://www.digitaljournal.com/business/bankrupt-sri-lankas-inflation-jumps-beyond-50/article#ixzz7XpfubIvc

Sri Lanka fuel crisis: ‘Living in my car for two days to buy fuel’- BBC News

July 1st, 2022

Courtesy BBC

Being the first in the queue is usually a coveted spot, but Ajeewan Sadasivam has no idea how long he’ll be stuck in this one. “I’ve been in line for two days already,” he says, as he waits patiently outside a petrol station in the capital Colombo. As a taxi driver, fuel is his lifeblood, but Sri Lanka has no fresh supplies of petrol coming in. “I have been sleeping in this car. Sometimes I leave to go and get food, then I come back and wait… I haven’t bathed in days.” He says he has no choice but to wait it out: “I have to look after my family, my wife and two children… only if there’s fuel can I start running my cab and make a living.” With no international shipments of fuel coming in for at least two weeks, supplies are being sent to the capital from other parts of the island, where there are still some reserves. But the island nation runs low on supplies.

IMF highlights ‘corruption vulnerabilities’ in report on Sri Lanka

July 1st, 2022

Courtesy The Statesman

MF has clearly mentioned that Sri Lanka needs to first reduce the prevalent corruption conditions and overhaul the taxation structure.

Sri Lanka Economic Crises: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) shared its end-of-mission report on Thursday and highlighted the ‘corruption vulnerabilities’ in Sri Lanka. The IMF personnel had conducted a study after visiting Sri Lanka from 20th to 30th of June. The 10 day long study visit was aimed at identifying the possibilities to extend a financial bailout package to the island nation, reeling under extreme financial crisis.

IMF has clearly mentioned that Sri Lanka needs to first reduce the prevalent corruption conditions and overhaul the taxation structure. IMF insisted that these measures must first be adopted, before any talks about the bailout be furthered.

IMF in an official said, The authorities have made considerable progress in formulating their economic reform program and we are looking forward to continuing the dialogue with them”.

It is to be noted that President Gotabaya Rajapaksha introduced drastic tax cuts in 2019, which are widely being blamed for the current economic crisis being faced by the country.

The statement also said, Given the low level of revenues, far-reaching tax reforms are urgently needed”.

It is highly recommended in the report that the country needs to urgently address the inflation levels and the severe balance of payments (BOP), prevalent in the economy.

The official statement also said, The authorities have made considerable progress in formulating their economic reform program and we are looking forward to continuing the dialogue with them”.

Sri Lanka is facing the worst situation in terms of its fuel reserves and has banned the sale of petroleum fuel for its citizens till 10th of July. Since the past several months, the 22 million people of the country have faced severe shortages of food and other essential commodities. In the past couple of weeks, the condition has worsened further and the country has been reaching out to other nations for financial and material assistance. In April this year, Sri Lanka faltered on its foreign debt of $51 billion.

It is also estimated by the United Nations (UN), that about 80% of the total population of the country is skipping meals in order to cope with food shortages.

The country has been witnessing widespread protests seeking resignation of President Rajapaksa because of the government’s mismanagement of the economic crisis.

The international lender point out that Sri Lanka required immediate debt restructuring and raising the taxation. It is evident that revenue inflow is at the bottom, so the only way to restore economic progression is through far-reaching tax reforms.

The statistics office of the government, on Tuesday said that the economic growth of the first quarter of 2022, is expected to remain at negative 1.6%.

Meanwhile, the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation has not confirmed placing any new orders for petroleum supplies yet. There is still a dilemma as to how the sale of petrol fuel would return to normalcy after July 10th.

The IMF is still reviewing the situation in the country and the further talks between the country’s leadership and IMF personnel would decide the fate of the nation. 

HRCSL: No prisoners were used in 09 May attacks on protesters

July 1st, 2022

Courtesy The Island

AG, CJ asked to take action against lawyer for triggering violence

The Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL) has declared that a false allegation by President of the Committee for Protecting Rights of Prisoners (CPRP) Attorney-at-Law Senaka Perera that some prisoners were used to attack anti-government protesters outside Temple Trees and at Galle Face on 09 May triggered violence in many parts of the country.

The HRCSL also faulted Sudesh Nadimal Silva also of the same organisation for propagating unsubstantiated allegations.

Justice (ret.) Rohini Marasinghe, in her capacity as the Chairperson of the HRCSL, said that both Senaka Perera and Sudesh Nandimal had failed to substantiate their allegations made at the Galle Face protest site on 10 May.

The HRCSL, in a statement issued yesterday (29) quoted Justice Marasinghe as having said: False propaganda as well as misinformation of the alleged use of Prisoners to have attacked the innocent protesters is both a diabolical lie and a deceitful action.”

The HRCSL has recommended that Attorney General Sanjaya Rajaratnam conduct a further investigations into allegations made by Senaka Perera and take necessary action

The HRCSL has requested Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, to take note of the detrimental statements made by Attorney-at-Law Senaka Perera and take due action.

The HRCSL consists of Ven. Kalupahana Piyarathana Thera, Dr. M.H. Nimal Karunasiri, Dr. Vijitha Nanayakkara and Ms. Anusuya Shanmuganathan.

The HRCSL dealt with the issue in a statement titled ‘The HRCSL condemns the false media broadcast made by the President of the Committee for Protecting Rights of Prisoners’.

The HRCSL issued the statement after the conclusion of a special investigation by an appointed committee of investigators (Col).

CoI consisted of Sanjeewa Weerawickrama, Attorney -at- Law, Miss. lmasha Senadeera, Attorney-at-Law and Dr. Dilshani Bogollagama.

Referring to allegation that prisoners had been used to attack protesters at protest sites at Galle Face and Temple Trees, the HRCSL said that the CoI determined that no prisoners had been used in perpetrating any attack on the peaceful protesters.

The HRCSL asserted that the unsubstantiated allegations caused an irreversible damage to the country.

The HRCSL said that a group of prisoners had been seriously assaulted and subjected to mental and physical torture by an unidentified group on 09 May.

The HRCSL stated: The unprecedented ruthless nature of the attack on prisoners and officials resulted in injuries and hospitalization of many inmates.” Since the incidents, eight prisoners hadn’t been accounted for so far, it has said.

The prisoners had been made available to the private sector enterprises in terms of an agreement endorsed by the Cabinet of Ministers in Oct 2021. On the day of the incidents, a group of prisoners had been taken to a designated work place and were on their way back when gangs intercepted them.

Attorney at Law Mr. Senaka Perera, the convener of the conference identified himself as a Human Rights Activist. The COI provided the CPRP president Mr. Senaka Perera with the opportunity to justify his statements that caused an outrage in both Sri Lanka and the World at large. For the purpose of submission of any evidence, in either oral statements or picture documentation in support of his statements, Mr. Perera was extended a justifiable time period. However, he expressly affirmed before the Committee that at the time of the statement or even thereafter he did not have any tangible evidence in favor of his expressed views in regard to the alleged incident. Mr. Sudesh Nadimal Silva was also summoned to give evidence before the COl. The Committee explaining the paramount importance of the maintenance of professional ethics provided Mr. Sudesh Nadimal Silva with the opportunity to provide a justifiable explanation for his expressed allegations. However, he was unable to provide any acceptable evidence in support of his statements.

The COI observed that the press conference which was chaired by M. Senaka Perera had dispensed totally false statements without any sustantive evidence.

Following the above-mentioned facts, the COI has identified the grave consequences of the negligent attitude of making unfounded statements. Inciting agitation in the general public against state departments and personnel has inadvertently led to disruptions to the law and order of the Country.

The COI further observed that these inaccurate declarations conveyed by the above speakers directly contributed to the series of violent activities and right violations, reported island wide. The combined result of the atrocities that occurred within a mere 48 hours resulted in the loss of 12 human lives with several hundred injured casualties. In addition, intentional damage and arson to both public and private properties surmount to the loss of billions of rupees.

After a thorough and diligent inquiry, the COI has arrived at the following conclusions. The highly irresponsible misconduct by the Attorney-of-Law Senaka Perera, with his speculative allegations with no substantiated evidence, resulted in disastrous consequences.

Hence, it is of paramount importance that members of professional bodies need to be guided by the code of conduct or the professional ethics as set out by the respective professional bodies for the due conduct of the members. These conditions of misconduct from individuals of representation and influence should be held accountable by the respective professional bodies.

It is the view of the COI that national media institutions must consciously adhere to responsible reporting and promote journalism with integrity, especially during this volatile period of both political and economic instability. This tantamount to avoidance of direct reporting of incidence without due assessment of this veracity and credibility. The Committee further advocates promotion of investigative journalist practices with the objective of strengthening the democratic fabric of the Country.”

Chief Prelates write to President on country’s current situation

July 1st, 2022

Courtesy Adaderana

The Chief Incumbents of the four Buddhist Chapters have written to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, stressing 10 matters, including the creation of economic stability and provision of relief to the people.

In their statement, the chief prelates said the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution should be passed in the parliament without delay.

They also stressed that the President should take expedite measures to convene political party leaders to appoint an honest, all-party government again.

The tenure of the all-party government should be limited to 6 months, the chief prelates emphasized, adding the tenure should be extended to 12 or 18 months only if it succeeds in stabilizing the economy and minimizing the issues faced by the public.

The Cabinet of Ministers of this all-party government should be limited to 15, and any politician convicted of corruption allegations should not be made part of it, the letter read further.

The chief prelates also called for proper coordination with international institutions and friendly countries for securing loan assistances and implementation of a proper mechanism to manage these funds.

.

Japanese Embassy denies media reports on Japan refusing to support Sri Lanka

July 1st, 2022

Courtesy Adaderana

The Embassy of Japan in Colombo today (July 01) categorically denied a media report which stated that Japan would not support Sri Lanka at the moment due to mismanagement of funds.

According to an article published by a local newspaper, the Ambassador of Japan to Sri Lanka reportedly mentioned this during a meeting with the TNA yesterday. The Japanese ambassador engaged in a visit to Jaffna from June 27 to 30.

Issuing a clarification on Japan’s position on the economic situation in Sri Lanka, the embassy dismissed the contents of the article as incorrect and misleading information”.

Japan is closely paying attention to the current difficult economic situation in Sri Lanka and severe humanitarian situation accompanied,” the statement noted.

The embassy also said: Considering such situation, the Government of Japan has decided to provide Emergency Grant Aid of USD 3 million through UNICEF and WFP in order to provide medicine and food in a manner that would directly benefit the Sri Lankan people. Japan sincerely hopes that this assistance will be of help to overcoming the hardship faced by the people of Sri Lanka, Japan’s long-standing friends.

The Government of Japan would like to consider its further contribution to Sri Lanka in consultation with the Government of Sri Lanka and other developing partners, while giving attention to the situation of Sri Lanka and the negotiation progress between Sri Lanka and IMF.

Japan, time-tested partner in Sri Lanka’s socio-economic development, has been supporting Sri Lanka and will continue to do its part in combining its efforts with the people and Government of Sri Lanka.”

Meanwhile, Deputy Ambassador of the Japanese Embassy, Katsuki Kotaro has written to the Prime Minister’s Office regarding the matter.

The PM’s office also stated that this would have a detrimental impact on the country’s economic recovery and the cordial bilateral relationship with Japan.

Why did Sabry-Nandalal & Sri Lanka’s top economists & business leaders recommend to stop debt repayment & float the rupee?

July 1st, 2022

Shenali D Waduge

Sri Lanka was always sitting on a time bomb. Our expenses were higher than our income/revenues, our imports were higher than our exports, we were living a superficial life on loans, taking more loans to settle loans and even loans to continue our lifestyle – it was only a matter of time that the bomb would explode. Confounding matters were several internal and global calamities – covid, global fuel crisis from Ukraine war, loss of revenues that Sri Lanka had been reliant on. The situation was well known to experts planning policy, advising governments and the top echelons of society. Now that we know the consequences of defaulting and free floating the rupee as well as the international legal cases against Sri Lanka – we have every right to question every expert” who prescribed these as their expert recommendation for Sri Lanka and citizens have every right to hold them equally accountable for the current plight. The situation has been made worse without dealing with the economic crisis but by creating a political crisis leading to double jeopardy for the nation.

These are the outcomes from declaring Sri Lanka bankrupt by Finance Minister Sabry & Governor Nandalal & recommended by business leaders in Sri Lanka

  • Sri Lanka became ranked D” – default country
  • Sri Lankan rupee value is out of control
  • Sri Lankan banks cannot open any LCs (Letter of Credit)
  • Sri Lanka nor the private sector can take new foreign currency loans
  • Sri Lankan banks are being asked by foreign banks to repay all loans taken
  • Sri Lankan banks have been made vulnerable
  • Sri Lankan businesses & importers cannot import
  • Sri Lankan citizens are facing tremendous economic challenges for survival
  • Sri Lankans are facing shortage of fuel, gas, medicines & other essentials.
  • Sri Lanka’s investments has stopped.
  • Sri Lankan interest rates are skyrocketing
  • Sri Lanka is facing legal action internationally
  • Sri Lanka has lost access to secure international loans

The present Governor – has been with not only Sri Lanka’s Central Bank but was a Director of the IMF as well & had been on every top expert Committee in the CBSL. He too should have known the adverse impact of defaulting debt repayment.

As for Finance Minister Sabry – his glorified speech in Parliament has only become

a pusswedilla following the outcome of defaulting.

Then there are the business and think tanks experts that prescribed to default repayment:

Note how all are justifying defaulting payment of loans claiming to save the money to purchase money for essentials. This is a layman’s answer and not one expected of experts knowing the above repercussions Sri Lanka has had to face as a result of non-payment.

https://www.ft.lk/business/Leaders-of-Ceylon-Chamber-top-economists-speak-out-on-forex-crisis/34-728960

What was the issue regarding honoring repayment of loans taken?

State of International Sovereign Bonds

  • From 2009 to 2014 – USD5000millon worth international sovereign bonds were issued by the Central Bank of SL

$5000m ISBs taken from 2009-2014 enabled Sri Lanka’s GDP growth from $42.1b in 2009 to $79.4b in 2014 (a growth of $37.3b in 5 years)

  • From 2015 to 2019 – 5billon worth international sovereign bonds had been issued by the Central Bank of SL agreeing to pay at high a interest rate of 7.85%

$12.5b ISBs taken from 2015-2019 saw a marginal GDP growth from $79.4b to $84b

Sri Lanka’s foreign exchange reserves from 2015-2019 was only $8.208m

  • From 2020 to 2022 no sovereign bonds were issued.

https://www.dailynews.lk/2022/05/04/features/278199/yahapalana-govt-borrowed-us-12050-million-2015-2019

At the end of Rajapakse term in early January 2015 Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves were $8.2b & ISB outstanding were $5b & net reserves were a positive $3.2b

By the end of 2019 Indrajit Coomaraswamy’s term as Governor, reserves were $7.6b & ISB outstanding were $15b & net reserves were a negative $7.4b

From early January 2022, there were regular calls for non-payment of foreign debt. This call emerged when the CBSL was to pay $500m on 18thJanuary 2022 for $500m ISB taken on 18 July 2016 at the rate of 5.75% interest.

In 2022 Sri Lanka also had to pay total $7b loan repayment.

Sri Lanka paid $1166m in March2022 (in addition to the $500m paid in Jan2022)

Sri Lanka was due to pay $78m in April2022 – why couldn’t Sabry & Nandalal do so?

More importantly, why couldn’t they have renegotiated its payment.

It is absolutely shocking that these 2 put Sri Lanka on bankruptcy status simply for $78m non-payment while the business experts of Sri Lanka also nodded approval! 

Had Sri Lanka taken the advice of these experts, Sri Lanka would have been in a pickle in January2022 itself.

Given that the economic crisis became a political crisis, we now have to wonder whether the economic crisis was part of the political crisis to which many were in the know.

Leading the political crisis as usual was the JVP openly calling for street riots by People.

JVP invites rioting in streets? – The Island

https://island.lk/jvp-organises-countrywide-protests-against-high-cost-of-living/
JVP organises countrywide protests against high cost of living – The Island

JVP inspires calls for protests against rising cost of living – The Island

Sumanthiran & EranW led the onslaught against repayment of debt loans (Jan2022) Sumanthiran was the Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Public Finance. Sumanthiran leads MPs’ call: Postpone debt repayment now – The Island

In the context of what Sri Lanka is facing as a result of defaulting, we have to question these calls for non-payment!

Was part of the crisis to leave no option but to go to IMF?

https://island.lk/gammanpila-favours-deal-with-imf-says-most-ministers-like-minded/ Udaya Gammanpila in Feb2022 declared  I have expressed my view that we should go to the IMF. Now most of the cabinet ministers are for an IMF deal,”

A pre-requisite to IMF program was to agree to a rate hike and a float of currency.

It was alleged that the CBSL was printing money at a rate prior to April 2022 but the amount of money currently being printed exceeds all previous amounts.

W A Wijewardena former Deputy Governor CBSL was a vociferous advocate of free floating of the rupee (a key IMF feature)Sri Lanka wouldn’t have been in crisis if CBSL had floated rupee in April last year –Dr. Wijewardena – The Island

Was this why Sabry-Nandalal declared Sri Lanka bankrupt embarrassing Sri Lanka & making Sri Lanka vulnerable?

Was the plan to make the nation & people suffer as it left no choice for Sri Lanka?

Was this choice already kept lined up with their wish list” in exchange for aid?

Was this why faces were quickly changed?

Whose decision was it to float the rupee? A collective decision by CBSL top management

Whose decision was it to default on repayment? Sabry-Nandalal & a coterie of 19 top businessmen/women

Thankfully, Sri Lanka CBSL not only paid $500m in Jan2022 but also $1066m in Mar2022. So why couldn’t CBSL pay $78m in April22?

If Sri Lanka had not honored repayment as advised by top business leaders, economists, politicians and even former Central Bank heads – Sri Lanka would have faced being sued by bondholders much earlier than the case currently filed against Sri Lanka in Jun2022 by Hamilton Reserve Bank Ltd for full payment of default on $1billion at 5.87% interest due on 25 July 2022.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/sri-lanka-sued-bondholder-us-094716058.html

It is also baffling why Sabry-Nandalal defaulted on the $78m repayment due on 12 April 2022 when China had assured to support with $1b in cash & $1.5b in trade finance over and above the support extended by India.

All these experts” have landed Sri Lanka in this crisis status. People should evaluate their actions against what the People are having to face.

Shenali D Waduge

POHOTTU AS USA’ S PROXY Part 5Da

June 30th, 2022

KAMALIKA PIERIS

Sarath Fonseka is credited with two achievements relating to the Eelam war. Firstly he single handedly, opposed the Ceasefire Agreement of 2002 (CFA) and secondly he played a major role in winning Eelam War IV.

Fonseka had strongly opposed the Ceasefire Agreement. He was the only officer who had the guts to publicly oppose the CFA, said Shamindra Ferdinando, especially the move to remove high security zones.  He flatly refused to do so, as long as the LTTE had artillery pieces and long range mortars.

Austin Fernando, then in charge of the Peace process, had accused Fonseka of undermining the entire peace process by refusing to cooperate by vacating public buildings in the Jaffna peninsula.

Shamindra said that the country should be grateful to Fonseka for taking a firm stand on the CFA. Had he given in to political pressure at that time, the outcome of the war would have been different.  LTTE could have overrun the Jaffna peninsula and won the war.

Fonseka is admired for his role in   winning Eelam war IV.  He will always be given credit for that. Kamal Gunaratne in his book Road to Nanthikadal, states that Sarath Fonseka was essential” for Eelam War IV. All plans for the war were prepared under his direction. He selected the commanders of the units. He did so ignoring seniority, in favor of proven ability.

Fonseka supervised the battles, from long distance, I think. During the last siege at Mullaitivu, Kamal said Fonseka’s phone calls were a nuisance, because it took him away from the fighting but also a help because of the support Fonseka provided.

Fonseka was on holiday in China during the last days of the    war. During the final stages of the armed conflict, Fonseka went to China with his mobile phone and the map of the Wanni, said Jagath Jayasuriya. But  Fonseka was contactable on telephone. He used to call and verify reports.

Fonseka was in China from May 1 to May 17.  He returned on the night of May 17. The war ended onMay 18, 2009.  This helped Fonseka to avoid the charge of war crimes. Fonseka’s name is never mentioned in the war crime charges of the west, though he was the Commander of the army at the time, noted critics.

Channel 4, while throwing blame on the President, Defence Secretary, General Shavendra Silva and General Prasanna Silva, leaves out Sarath Fonseka from its war crimes charge, observed Rajiva Wijesinha. Amnesty International spokesman Sam Zarifi also stresses the responsibility of the first two, and absolutely omits Sarath Fonseka.

Sarath Fonseka had political ambitions and the USA took note of this. USA’s ambassador to Sri Lanka, Robert O Blake engaged Fonseka at the height of Eelam war IV, said critics. He persuaded Fonseka to apply for permanent residency in the US. Fonseka was awarded permanent residency in USA  well before the Eelam war ended.

To get a US Green card you normally need to live in USA for five years but it could also be got if the Head of CIA, Attorney general or Head of immigration advised that the applicant could provide confidential information vital to their country, said analysts.

Fonseka was Chief of Defense staff as well as Army commander at the time. He was therefore privy to defense and other official secrets. The public is entitled to ask Fonseka whether he had obtained US citizenship by giving confidential defense information to the US authorities, said critics.

Fonseka visited Washington at least three times, after the start of Eelam War IV. He went in November 2006, November 2008 and November 2009. He spent too much time hanging around Washington during the LTTE conflict, said John Stanton.  

In November 2006, he went to Washington on a three-day official visit. He had meetings at the Pentagon with the Chief of Staff US Army, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other senior officials of the Army.

Fonseka went to the US in November2008 to tour Washington, while the Sri Lanka army was fighting at Muhamalai and Kilinochchi, commented critics. Fonseka is perhaps the only permanent resident of the US with the exception of Pakistan’s Musharraf, to be accorded such a reception in Washington, they said. Fonseka returned in December 2008.

His third visit was in 2009. Gen. Fonseka and his wife left for the U.S. on October 23 2009. Fonseka, who is a U.S. Green Card holder, has a residence in Oklahoma. His visit is in connection with renewing his Green Card which affords him residency in the U.S. This is a prelude to U.S. citizenship, media reported.

Their visit was to be partly official. Fonseka was invited to U.S. Pacific Command in Hawaii for farewell ceremonies to its commander Admiral Timothy J. Keating. But there was a complication.

US Department of Homeland Security  had wanted to interview Fonseka on a statement he had has made earlier regarding the Sri Lanka army refusing to accept the surrender of LTTE soldiers. Fonseka got alarmed. He contacted lawyers, the embassy and the Foreign ministry.

The Government of Sri Lanka had protested to the US ambassador. The interview should not take place, the government of Sri Lanka said.  Despite Fonseka’s status as a green-card holder, the U.S. does not have any jurisdiction over him because he entered the country on a Sri Lankan passport.

General Fonseka is a citizen of Sri Lanka and he holds a diplomatic passport from Sri Lanka.  Further, Fonseka could not divulge privileged information on the war and its conduct without approval from the government of Sri Lanka. “Fonseka returned to Sri Lanka without going for the interview.

It is suggested that Fonseka had engaged in covert and overt politics some time during these three  visits, while holding high position in the army. at one of these visits he had    made a politically incorrect speech at a Buddhist temple in the USA causing the chief prelate of the temple to intervene to lessen its negative impact. On his last visit Fonseka had ‘sung like a bird’, said Dayan Jayatilaka. (Rajiva Wijesinghe. Lakmahal at war. P 329).

In 2010 USA selected Sarath Fonseka to be their man in Sri Lanka. Fonseka      came forward as a candidate for the 2010 Presidential election. The US threw its weight behind Fonseka. Many Sri Lankans saw Fonseka as a tool of the US government and western interests, said John Stanton. other forces were also rallying behind Fonseka, added the media.

Sarath Fonseka’s campaign for the Presidency has a “made in USA” tag on it said a Daily News editorial. Sunday Observer ran the headline, ‘west behind moves to regime change’. if Fonseka comes, there will be external interference in Sri Lanka on an unprecedented scale, Sunday Observer added.

The problem was how to present a coarse, humorless general as an erudite individual of some refinement and polish and dent Mahinda Rajapaksa‘s unbelievable popularity. To this end, a massive USD 140 million was pumped into the country through conduits that include NGOs that has been identified as being friendly to US interests, reported Asian Tribune.

for the election campaign, USA borrowed items from Obama campaign such as the slogan, ‘change.’  The dirty tricks played via SMS, Twitter, and Face book are similar to those employed in the recent Iranian elections. Internet manipulations visa SMS, Face book and Twitter took place during the Sri Lanka presidential campaign. A disinformation campaign was unleashed with the connivance of the foreign press and certain foreign embassies, said the media.

Fonseka had a tremendous backing at the election. UK, US and Norway are supporting Sarath Fonseka, said critics. The day before the Presidential election, Fonseka group held a meeting with representatives of the Colombo based diplomatic community. Those attending included American ambassador, British, Australia, EU, and Norway.  When Sarath Fonseka, arrived in Parliament, after the general election ‘the first thing he did inside the House was to wave at the British and US envoys in the VIP gallery, noted the media.

Fonseka received the support of many local political parties. UNP-TNA-SLMC- JVP   backed Fonseka. JVP was getting huge sums from US and Norway to support Fonseka in the Presidential election, said critics.

 TNA declared its support for Fonseka’s candidature and the northern and eastern provinces responded accordingly. Fonseka comfortably won all northern and eastern districts.  Sampanthan said that Rajapakse refused to consider TNA demands, while Fonseka said he would consider the demand for merger of North and east.

TNA stated that Fonseka had agreed to their conditions. There is a signed agreement. Diplomats and foreign governments have been informed. Copies of the agreement were sent to foreign representatives too, said TNA. The LTTE overseas were also fully behind Fonseka.

In the Presidential election of  2010, we saw a scowling candidate issuing threats to all and sundry from the public platform, unlike before. Apart from the lack of smile, it is the pure hate that has been emanating from the opposition platform has been frightening to watch. Fonseka has entered the political forum to settle scores with his former boss and it shows.

 He threatened to dismiss police officers, court marital army officer, chase economists out of the country and to imprison literally all who cross his path. Never before have presidential elections had a candidate who so liberally doles out threats. How will he behave when in power, if he behaves like this   when out of power, onlookers asked. Those who saw Fonseka at work at close quarters and knew the plans he had if he won the election , were most relived that he lost.

In spite of the support of USA as well as a coalition comprising the UNP-JVP-TNA-SLMC-ACMC and the Civil society”, Fonseka suffered a humiliating defeat. Fonseka lost by a staggering 1.8 million votes. Fonseka won in North and east, also Colombo municipality, Dehiwela, Negombo, and Galle. He won in  places where there were less Sinahla Buddhist, said analysts. Roughly about 8% Sinhalese voted for Fonseka. Fonseka complained that the election had been rigged. He wanted foreign countries to interfere. He repeatedly said they must interfere.

After the election ended, the Fonseka    group, instead of going home, took up residence in a hotel with a large retinue of armed personnel. They took a whole floor of the hotel. My recall is that Karu Jayasuriya and Mangala Samaraweera also joined them.

The foreign press was kept standing by. False information was fed to the world from the hotel and it was taken up by the world media. There was speculation that they had planned to carry out a coup d’état there.

‘There was something going on’ before the election, Mahinda Rajapaksa said later. Fonseka was moving Special Forces to Colombo, also forces from Sinha regiment that he considered were loyal to him. he was harboring deserters as well.

After Fonseka’s defeat there was a reversal. Over 26 retired military officers who had supported Fonseka in his Presidential election campaign joined the government after the election. They said Fonseka was now with the JVP and did not help them at all, when they were in difficulties. Some of them were barred from entering his office after he joined the JVP.  He took no action when they were detained by the military. He did not have an iota of concern for his fellow officers and their families who underwent immense problems after the presidential election, they complained.

POHOTTU AS USA’ S PROXY Part 5Db

June 30th, 2022

KAMALIKA PIERIS

Fonseka went in for self promotion once the war ended. DBS Jeyaraj observed that on July 9 2009, Fonseka spoke at a book launch about the war, in which he heaped compliments upon himself lavishly. Token lip service was paid to the President’s role. Gotabaya was virtually ignored. According to Sarath he and he alone had won the war with the President’s support. It was a one-man show. This implied that Sarath and not Mahinda was the savior of the nation.

Another incident was the felicitation ceremony at Dharmasoka College, Ambalangoda on July 10. 2009. All traffic was stopped along the Galle Road for hours. There were massive security arrangements made arbitrarily by Fonseka’s security personnel causing much hardship to people. Sarath waxed eloquent about his role in winning the war alone to an appreciative home audience. There were increasing signs that Sarath and his merry-men in the Army were becoming a law unto themselves. It was as if a parallel authority was being exercised by Fonseka in certain spheres said DBS.

Sarath Fonseka also kept drawing attention to lapses in the war. On one occasion, he said, Many crimes had taken place at some places and they should be inquired into and those responsible, should be punished so that the dignity of the Sri Lanka Army could be protected. If all those who were involved in criminal activities were to be punished, the Sri Lanka Army would regain its lost dignity.

We see in hindsight that Fonseka had been planning his entry into politics for years. Here was a military officer seeking publicity or a monopoly of the credit for the war, the way a politician would, noted Chandraprema.

Fonseka will be remembered as the Army Commander who stated that his superiors had wanted soldiers who surrendered to be killed during Eelam War IV. This statement was flatly contradicted by Kamal Gunaratne in his book Road to Nanthikadal, (p 712) where he stated, Not a single LTTE laid down arms and came forward to surrender.”

Analysts notes that such allegations are usually made by persons outside the army, in this case it was made by a person within the army high command.  This is the first time in living memory, that any country in the world has had a former army commander like this, they said. Sarath Fonseka should be arrested for his sudu kodi story, the first step in war crime charges.

USA had noted in Nov 2009 that A media outlet reported on July 18 that at a celebrity event in Ambalangoda, Army Chief General Sarath Fonseka stated that in Eelam War IV, the military had been asked to ignore the rules of war and kill LTTE rebels who came to surrender carrying white flags”.

Then, Sunday Leader of 13.12.2009 stated that  Fonseka had said that that Defence secretary  Gotabaya  had instructed Brigadier Shavendra de Silva, commanding officer of the 58th divisor fighting in  Mullaitivu ,not to   take in any LTTE leaders who wanted to surrender. They must all be killed. The Sunday Leader gave this item the headline, ‘Gota ordered them to be shot.

Fonseka had said. “When Nadeshan, Pulidevan and Ramesh walked towards the Sri Lanka Army positions carrying white cloths in the first hours of 18 May 2009, soldiers opened fire on them and killed them. An unspecified number of family members of the three men were killed as well.

This allegation was partially withdrawn on 14.12.2009. Sarath Fonseka then said that a journalist had told him that Gotabhaya Rajapaksa had instructed the army to shoot those who were surrendering with white flags at the end of the LTTE war.

This white flag waving LTTE surrender statement is reportedly a transcript of a recording that was made in US which found its way into the island in the pouch of a roving envoy, which, again reportedly, was played to a journalist who had the privilege of listening but was not permitted to make a copy of the recording, said an analyst.

Critics noted that though Fonseka has said that he was been misquoted he had not rejected the news item and had not taken any action against the newspaper. The newspaper carried a clarification without an editor’s note to avert the public attention on this matter.

Chandraprema said he thought that Fonseka‘s statement to Sunday Leader was to get out of a sticky situation by putting the blame on Defense Secretary. He keeps returning to this issue, Chandraprema commented.

Lawyers expressed their dismay over the errant and treacherous statement” made by Fonseka, Fonseka’s statement that Gotabaya Rajapaksa said to kill the LTTE who were surrendering at end of war, could lead to a war crimes charge, analyst said. Security forces could be brought before an International War crimes tribunal based on this statement made by Fonseka.

Once a former army commander makes accusations such as the one made by Fonseka against a serving Defense secretary and serving senior army officers no country can ignore it, they added.

in December 2009 Philip Alston, UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, summary and arbitrary execution wrote  about the matter to the  Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations office at Geneva.  The United Nations has asked the Sri Lankan government to explain its position on the allegations leveled by the former army chief General Sarath Fonseka that three senior Tamil Tiger leaders were executed by soldiers as they came forward to surrender, Hindustan Times reported.

POHOTTU AS USA’ S PROXY Part 5Dc

June 30th, 2022

KAMALIKA PIERIS

Due to the much publicized animosity between the Army commander  Sarath Fonseka and the   head of the Navy,  Wasantha Karannagoda,  relations between navy and army was strained  during Eelam war IV .Officers in the army knew this and were wary and guarded in their actions, said Kamal Gunaratne .

The animosity between the two was well known, not only to the armed forces but also to the public. When Sarath Fonseka’s brother wrote an open letter to the President regarding Sarath, a reader responded that in the matter of rivalry among the Commanders of the armed forces, it is well known that it is Fonseka who spearheaded the rivalry.

Fonseka did not cooperate with the navy during Eelam war IV.  Navy wanted to move its boats to Chalai to help in the Mullaitivu campaign. They planned to beach at Chalai. Fonseka had said that since it was the army that had liberated Chalai, navy has no right to be there. Navy undaunted, said then they would keep the boats bobbing on the sea at Chalai. The sea was under the control of the navy.

 They anchored the boats at sea. Sailors went to and fro wading in water up to their waists. They carried out their duties in wet clothes. Karannagoda was told that the sailors were determined to support the war, regardless of any obstruction.  He provided additional uniforms for them to change into.

Fonseka created a serious issue at Kayts. The islands around Jaffna came under the control of the Navy. LTTE attacked Kayts and the army was sent in to defeat them. Fonseka then tried to take over Kayts from the navy. Fonseka had sent in army tanks and threatened to use them against the navy. Navy blocked the causeway and informed Karannagoda. Karannagoda contacted the Defence secretary who ordered the army to retreat. Within 15 minutes of receiving the order, the army tanks had left.

In 2006, LTTE had set up gun positions at Sampur. Artillery fired from these could cripple the naval base in Trincomalee.  All movements of naval vessels were also under the surveillance of the LTTE. Karannagoda wanted the LTTE camps at Sampur removed immediately.

He brought up the matter at the Joint Operations Headquarters and then at Defence Council. Fonseka had said that he needed a stronger army than he had to do this. He needed at least 2000 soldiers to attack Sampur.   This would weaken the army in the North. He will attend to the matter when the army got stronger.

It was clear that Fonseka was trying to postpone attacking Sampur, said Karannagoda .This did not last long. The government ordered that Sampur be cleared of LTTE and army did so with the help of air force, to the great relief of the navy.

The media had told Karannagoda that Fonseka insisted that the activities of the navy, especially navy victories should be not be given publicity. Therefore Navy got very little publicity for its valuable work in Eelam War IV. Instead foreign media   carried negative news about the navy. For instance, it stated that there were a number of civilian killings in Kayts Island, allegedly by the Sri Lanka Navy in 2006.

Chandraprema observed that Fonseka had his own coterie of journalists, who could only write about what happened on land. The air and sea were out of bounds. Fonseka   had to be the central figure. Keith Noyahr, the defense correspondent of the Nation got his defense stories from the navy. He was given a good beating, said Chandraprema.

Karannagoda stated that there were   5 newspaper men   supporting Fonseka and attacking him, Karannagoda. Upali Tennakoon, editor of Rivira   had contacted Karannagoda regarding a damaging statement made about the navy. Karannagoda had mentioned this at the next Defence Council meeting. Three days later, he heard that   Tennekoon and wife had been assaulted by persons who had come on motor cycles, with faces covered. Tennekoon family had   left the country thereafter.

Karannagoda in his book ‘Adhistanaya’ gave a first person account of his relationship with Fonseka. Karannagoda had been appointed Commander of Navy in 2005. The navy improved greatly under Karannagoda   and became a force to be reckoned with. There was the swarm attacks using Arrow boats, and the destroying of 8 foreign weapon ships using Sri Lanka’s aging ships. Karannagoda   had no political ambitions but Fonseka saw him as a rival.

The first indication of opposition came in 2006, when at the   Conference of heads of services,     Karannagoda found that Sarath Fonseka together with Daya Sandagiri, former navy commander and now chief of Defence staff started to attack the navy strongly. (p 275)The antagonism got worse and the attacks at the meetings increased. Karannagoda  was heavily criticized and ridiculed.  Fonseka behaved as though he was  chairing  the meeting, said Karannagoda .  

Then one day, Karannagoda found that he could not enter the premises with his full convoy of transport when he went to attend JOH meetings. An officer was stationed at the gate to tell him so. The  Head of Air force was allowed n with his full complement of vehicles. Karannagoda did not attend JOH meetings thereafter. Fonseka’s plan was to silence me somehow, Karannagoda decided.

Karannagoda states that after Kayts, Fonseka had tried very hard to get Karannagoda removed from the post of Commander of Navy. The navy was an obstacle to  Fonseka ‘s plan to take  full  control.  Fonseka wanted to say that he won the war alone.

Fonseka wanted to show that this war could not proceed without him and that he was under greater threat.  Fonseka went by helicopter with his chief aid and   4 soldiers.  We went with just one soldier.” Karannagoda also observed that Fonseka did not visit the battle zone. He went in battle proof trucks from the helicopter straight to the conference room and back home.

More than winning the war, what was important for Fonseka was to attack those he disliked. He  did not care if it benefited LTTE  or not. We won the war in a setting like this, stated Karannagoda in his memoir.

The clash between Fonseka and Wasantha Karannagoda, Commander of the navy was seen as a personal one, starting from school days. That was the explanation provided by the media.This is unlikely.  It was probably connected to his link to USA. It may have been a part of his briefing from USA. Fonseka clearly showed a confidence which went way beyond his position as Commander of the army, both during and after Eelam War IV.

Fonseka’s appointment as  Army commander was not a popular one. Media reported that Chief justice Sarath Silva,   had called Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa and told him not to grant an extension to Fonseka as Army commander, since his actions had led to many injustices in the army ,causing a lot of dissent.

There was also Fonseka’s dictatorial tendency. Many others, including government and opposition politicians and retired and senior serving military officers had the same sentiments, Silva said. But Gotabaya Rajapaksa thought that changing the Army commander in the middle of a military campaign was not advisable.

Fonseka discriminated against some of his officers while favoring others whom he liked. Fonseka refused to let Jagath Jayasuriya  go up to the frontlines. He was kept in charge of administration and logistics and not allowed any battlefront duties. Jayasuriya was made Commander of the Wanni region.

In 2017as he was finishing his term as Ambassador for Brazil, Gen Jagath Jayasuriya, was charged for war crimes by International Truth and Justice Project. The executive director of ITJP was Yasmin Sooka.

 On 28 August 2017, ITJP filed complaints in Brazil, Colombia, and Chile and at the Embassy of Suriname against Jagath Jayasuriya, for his alleged involvement in war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the final phase of the Sri Lankan civil war.

By the time the action got going, Jayasuriya’s period in Brazil had come to an end and he was back in Sri Lanka.There was a spate of media interviews where Jayasuriya denied all allegations against him. He said that he had been Commander in the Wanni from August 2007 till the war ended, in charge of logistics. He had not been involved in actual combat during the final phases of the war. Therefore he could not be accused of war crimes.

The divisions in the battle field were not brought under Jayasuriya. He was the Vanni Security Forces Commander overseeing the front line bunker line in Vavuniya. He was only entrusted with providing logistics facilities to Army personnel in the battle field and evacuating of casualties, reported the media.

Jayasuriya then said that if indeed war crimes had occurred they were likely to have happened in the frontlines. If so, the person responsible was the  Army Commander. The implication was that it was Fonseka as the Army Commander, who had to bear responsibility.

If Jayasuriya was allowed to continue in this manner without being challenged, it would only have been a matter of time before blame would have been attached to Fonseka. So Fonseka had to intervene.

 The ITJP had also charged that  human rights violation and war crimes has been committed in  Joseph Camp” in Vavuniya. Jayasuriya had been based in this camp which came under the Wanni command. Fonseka picked this up.

 Fonseka conducted a press conference in which he accused Jagath Jayasuriya of having committed war crimes. The Field Marshall claimed that he had proof and would be ready to testify against Jayasuriya if an investigation was held.

He said, that Maj. Gen. Jagath Jayasuriya had committed crimes during his tenure as the senior officer based in Vavuniya. Fonseka  said that he had information about some atrocious incidents happening to those detained at the Vavuniya headquarters camp.

Fonseka alleged that Jayasuriya had subjected those who were arrested by troops, under his command, to ‘criminal activity’. He had received many complaints that Jayasuriya had allegedly committed various offences. I was determined to take action against him after the war was over.” In an extensive interview given to  the media Jagath Jayasuriya denied charges that he had sanctioned or supervised the torture of detenues at the camp.

The heated exchanges between Field Marshall Sarath Fonseka and Lieutenant-General Jagath Jayasuriya   showed long standing, deep seated animosity, observed DBS Jeyaraj. One irritant was that Jayasuriya was a distant relative of the Rajapaksas and had access to both Mahinda and Gotabaya , said DBS .

The on-going  arguments between the Field Marshall and Lieutenant -General provided much entertainment to the casual observer but it  portrayed the armed forces in very poor light. The public spat between Fonseka and Jayasuriya may have continued further but Lt. Gen Mahesh Senanayake intervened and stopped it.

Senanayake expressed displeasure over Fonseka’s outburst. Senanayake pointed out that only an allegation, nothing else ,had been made in a foreign country against Jagath Jayasuriya. Senanayake said personal rivalries should not be allowed to sully the Sri Lankan Army’s reputation. He said that even if a single officer was criticized openly it affected the entire Army’s morale, concluded DBS Jeyaraj. 

De-dollarize!

June 30th, 2022

Malinda Seneviratne


Sometime in the year 1992, an Economics student at the University of Peradeniya confessed confusion over a comment by Dr S B De Silva regarding multinational corporations. Apparently he didn’t have an issue with MNCs and the student had been shocked. Elaboration cleared it all up. What he had meant was that it doesn’t really matter, strictly in an economic sense, who rakes up the profits from a capitalist system; surplus value is anyway extracted and the worker is exploited. Whether the profiteer is white or black, an MNC or a local, is therefore irrelevant.  

What’s the relevance of all this, though? Relevant in the context of Sri Lanka’s current economic crisis, nay meltdown, and the search for succour, with experts and politicians out-screaming one another with the acronymic mantra, ‘IMF, IMF, IMF!’ Envoys of all hue are being sent, it is reported, to various countries. Foreign delegates are a-visiting, pledging friendship and support.

The bucks aren’t really flowing though, at least not in volumes that can ease burdens or relieve anxiety, never mind rebooting the system and setting the country back on its proverbial feet. Through it all there is a discernible hope-slant towards the USA-led sections of the international community and of course the US-controlled multilateral (sic) institutions, the UN system and the Bretton Woods Institutions. Relevant happy-pills, so to speak, are being talked of, predictably predicated with misbegotten economic theories and uttered with appropriate tones of humbleness. It’s a ‘dollar crisis’ after all, or rather the absence of dollars.

Leaders cannot be faulted or rather their dollar-fixation is understandable. After all, that’s all they’ve known when it comes to external assistance. Dollars, pounds and of late euros. After all, leaders as well as their advisors have for decades worshipped politically-motivated and ideology-laden neoliberal economic theories that are less outdated than intellectually untenable. For years. No, decades. Many of them, no doubt, have personal ties with North America. It’s almost as though they’ve internalised northamericanism to the point that they, like the vast majority of North American kids, are pretty much ignorant of the world outside that continent. China and Russia for example exist only in terms of a black-balled list.

The world is not flat though. Neither is it static. The truth rises regardless. The long twentieth century of American domination is ending or, according to some, has ended. Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe himself admitted a few years ago that Sri Lanka would have to look towards the East.

And yet, even those who talk of system-change still bank on the IMF, which is essentially a prescription for kicking the can down the road. The centre of global gravity has shifted and those who are in denial are the last that anyone should go to for help. If not anything else, the very fact that US belligerence succeeded in driving a knife into its own economic heart by imposing sanctions on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine.

Shiran Illanperuma in an article in newswire.lk titled ‘Eurasian integration is a prerequisite for de-dollarizing Sri Lanka,’ has detailed the relevant history pertaining to the rise of petrodollars and the steady decline in dollar-hegemony. The world is fast diversifying away from dollar-dominated assets, he argues, in order to manage economic and geopolitical risks. It’s worth quoting:

‘In 2019, Russia halved the dollar-denominated share of their forex reserves, opting to expand Euro, Yuan and gold holdings, which now comprise around 90% of Russia’s reserves. Meanwhile, China has been its US treasury holdings since 2015, opting instead to lend to developing countries through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and accelerate Eurasian economic integration. By 2021, IMF data showed that the US Dollar share of global reserves had dropped to its lowest levels since 1995. According to a 2021 survey by London-based think tank OMFIF, 30% of central banks planned to increase their holding of Yuan, while 20% planned to reduce their holdings of the US dollar.’

Shiran argues that Sri Lanka can’t really de-dollarize despite strong ties with the de-dollarizing bloc, Russia and China, because the export address is essentially ‘West.’ Fair enough. One reason is that Sri Lanka has never explored other markets, because just like leaders, industrialists are geographically challenged. They just don’t see Russia or China. Or India, one might add. At the same time, given the current crisis, we are in a situation where production is grinding to a halt. If there’s nothing much to export, then fixations or lack thereof regarding export addresses cease to matter.

Of course the US, EU and the UK will have none of it. Our leaders or rather their advisors would be wary of venturing along untrodden paths. India, in a way, might be less bullish about policy preferences since India has committed herself to a policy regime that de-dollarizes without uttering the term. If India so loves Sri Lanka, as Indian leaders, diplomats and visiting dignitaries are fond of saying, then India would be honor-bound to protect Sri Lanka if the US, EU and UK try to arm-twist policy-makers into continued dollar-submission.

But forget India. Who has the money? The UK, US and EU? No. Who has oil and gas? The US, UK and EU? No. Who is willing to help at this point? The UK, US and EU? No. Who has helped (and not incapacitated Sri Lanka’s efforts to wean herself from dependency)? The US, EU and UK? No.  

So, why not China and Russia? The bad boys? Is that the objection? Well, what’s the difference, S B De Silva would have certainly asked. As Shiran points out these countries have had long histories of friendship with Sri Lanka. They’ve not arm-twisted or sought to mangle us in international forums. Anyway, they call the shots now, whether we like it or not.

How about existing debt, did someone squeak? Yes, there is existing debt. Compensation for the loot is yet to be paid. The loan-sharks can be directed to the British, Portuguese and Dutch. How about the fact that we are exchanging one system of dependence to what would be a different system of dependence? As mentioned, one can respond thus: ‘what’s the difference except the first set is broke and the other set is not; the first will play hard ball and the latter have not and may not; the first is struggling and the other has the resources.’  

But why be dependent at all? Well, look around you. We need not have come to this, but we have. We opted to party on borrowed bucks for decades. We didn’t develop our industries, we opted for an agricultural policy that enslaved us. We embraced an import mafia. We can turn all that back, but that will take us a lot of time. Should make the effort, but there’s an ‘in the meantime’ that we have to contend with.  

The aragalists and would-be champions of the aragalaya aren’t saying #dedolarizenow though. Makes one wonder, does it not? 



malindadocs@gmail.com

[Malinda Seneviratne is the Director/CEO of the Hector Kobbekaduwa Agrarian Research and Training Institute. These are his personal views.]

AK-47 හා කාන්තා අයිතිය

June 30th, 2022

ජයන්ත හේරත්

ඇමරිකාණු

තුවක්කු අයිතිය

ලිඛිත ව්යවස්ථාවෙන්

protected ය.

කාන්තා අයිතීන් 

එහෙම රකින්නට

ව්යවස්ථාවේ ලියවී නැත.

එබැවින්

පහුගියදා

ඇමෙරිකානු මහ උසාවිය

කාන්තාවන්ගේ

ගබ්සා කර ගැනීමේ අයිතිය

උදුරා දමන්නට

තීන්දු කළේය.

ජේන් ෆෝන්ඩා

කාන්තා සිරුර

AK-47 හැටියට

නිර්වචනය කරන

කාලය ඇවිත්

බව

මතක් කරන්නේ

එවිට

ව්යවස්ථානුකුලව

රැකවරණය ලබන්නට

හැකි බව පෙන්වා දෙමින්ය.

ඒ අදහසත් එක අතකට වැරදි නැත.

තවත් අතකින් නම් වැරදිය

ඒ නම්,

කාන්තා නිදහස,

තුවක්කු නිදහස

හා කිසි ලෙස සමපාතව

සැලකිය යුතු නැති නිසාය.

කෙසේ නමුත්

ආණ්ඩුවකට

කැමති කැමති විදියට

කාන්තා අයිතීන්

උදුරා දමන්නට

ඉඩ දිය යුතු නැත.

රටක සතු ඉඩම් වගේ ය

උදේ

පාන්දර නැගිට

හෝ

මධ්යම රාත්රියේ

අගමැටි ට

කැමති විදියට

unitary state එක

රටේ ඉඩම්

කඩා

බෙදා දී

විනාස කිරීමට

ඉඩ නොතැබිය යුතුය.

උතුරේ සිට දකුණට

හෝ

නැගෙනහිර සිට බටහිරට හෝ

රත්තරනින් සැරසුණ

රූමත් කාන්තාවකට 

නිරුපද්රිතව යෑමට ඊමට

හැකි කාලයක්

ලංකාවේ එකල

තිබුණු

බවක් අසා ඇත,

ඇමෙරිකාවේ

එදා තිබ්බෙ නැත්තේද එයය,

සම අයිතිවාසිකම්

හා

කාන්තා විමුක්තිය

කෙසේ වෙතත්,

මෙදා එවැන්නක් ඇති වෙතැයි

හිතන්නට බැරිය.

SECULARISM IN QUESTION

June 30th, 2022

ALI SUKHANVER

From Nepal to Pakistan and from Sri Lanka to India, the South-Asian region is no doubt a paradise on earth, blessed with a lot of scenic beauty, mystic serenity and natural sublimity. Most of the people belonging to this region have hearts enriched with love, kindness and sympathy for the whole humanity. Though the South-Asian region comprises of the people following different religious philosophies but their ‘philosophical’ differences never create hostile-distances among them. From Buddhism to Hinduism and from Sikhism to Islam, one finds the followers of every religion here in a large number; at some places in minority and at some places in majority. That is the reason that here we find countless temples, gurdwaras, churches and mosques in almost all areas of the South Asian region. For example in Pakistan the people from the Buddhist community are not more than a few thousand but there are countless religious icons here in Pakistan belonging to the Buddhist heritage. These icons include the Fasting Buddha in Lahore, Buddha’s Relics in Taxila, Dharma Rajika Stupa in Taxila, Shatial Rock Carving in Chilas, the Healing statue of Buddha and Seat of Saints in Jaulian, the statue of Sleeping Buddha in Haripur, Buddhist Stupa in Mohenjo-daro, Jehanabad Buddha in Swat and the Throne of the Water Spring inTakht-i-Bahi, Mardan. Same is the case with churches, Hindu temples and Gurdwaras; they are also in a large number. The government of Pakistan spends millions of rupees on looking after sacred places belonging to the Buddhist, Christian, Sikh and Hindu community.

Almost a decade back when Pakistan unfortunately was under a severe wave of terrorism, reportedly some of the historic Buddhist religious icons were damaged by the foreign-supported terrorists near Pak-Afghan border area. It is also very a very painful fact that because of some Indian patronized miscreants, Pakistan couldn’t be a safe place for the tourists, particularly for those who wished to visit Pakistan for seeing their sacred places; people from the Sikh and the Buddhist community were on top of the list among them. Recently the BJP government has issued an advisory for Sikhs and Hindu pilgrims coming to Pakistan directing them to desist staying as a guest of any Pakistani citizen. The advisory further warns that the Indian pilgrims who accept the hospitality of Pakistani citizens will be blacklisted for the future. Now-a-days about 495 Sikh pilgrims from India are visiting Pakistan to celebrate the anniversary of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. This unethical advisory rather warning is a proof that the people of Pakistan give a very warm welcome to the Hindu and Sikh pilgrims and certainly this warmth is not acceptable to the BJP government.

The relationship between Buddhism and Pakistan is no doubt it very deep-rooted. It was Raja Tri Dev Roy, the Chief of the Chakma tribe who openly supported and favoured Pakistan during the 1971 war with India. That war had resulted in separation of the West Pakistan from the East Pakistan. After that separation Raja Tri Dev Roy left Bangladesh’s Chittagong region and settled in Pakistan. In Pakistan he founded the Pakistan Buddhist Society and remained its Chairman from 1996 till his death in 2012. During all that period, his family remained settled in Bangladesh. Raja Tri Dev Roy lived a very active social, political and religious life in Pakistan. Still people of Pakistan admire and appreciate his role as a politician, diplomat and a writer. He had been the Minister of the Minority Affairs in Zulfikar Ali Bhutto cabinet too. It is also a very interesting fact that the Buddhist and the Muslim communities had never been hostile to each other because both religions promote love, kindness and equality for all human beings, though there had been conflicts and clashes between the people belonging to the two communities at some places, particularly in Bangladesh but not on religious basis. The basic reason for this harmony is that Buddhism, just like Islam, disregards the inhuman caste system. According to the Buddha’s preaching, individual people might be able to attain enlightenment in this life and moreover caste was not a punishment for deeds committed in a past life. Buddha further preached that prejudice is an example of ignorance and believing that we are in some way superior to those around us is an example of craving or of fear.

Today for the Hindu extremists in India, Buddhism has become the most serious threat because countless low-caste Hindus are tired of their everyday persecution at the hands of the Upper Caste Hindus and that is why they find a comfortable sheltering zone in Buddhism. For Buddhists, the caste system is an example of discrimination and is something that they do not support. No doubt it is very much true that all Hindus of India are not extremists; neither were they all in the past but extremism has always been a dominating factor in that society. Be it the Muslims, the Sikhs, the Christians or the Buddhists; and even the low-caste Hindus commonly known as the Dalits, everyone is being exploited and maltreated by the extremist Hindus. The low-caste Hindus in a big number are reverting to other religions simply because of this insulting maltreatment.

According to the Wikipedia, in the 1951 census of India, 181,000 (0.05%) respondents said they were Buddhist. The 1961 census showed an increase to 3.25 million (0.74%). According to the 2011 census, Scheduled Castes Buddhists grew by 38 percent in the country. In short, Buddhism is growing rapidly in the Scheduled Caste (Dalit) community. This large number of Dalits embracing the Buddhist religion is simply a reaction against maltreatment with the low-caste Hindus. But it seems that such a large number of the Hindus changing their religion are never disturbing for the BJP government. Experts say that Modi led government is intentionally working on a plan of making India a land only for the Hindus; the upper-caste Hindus only. Recently during Modi’s visit to Nepal on 16th and 17th May 2022, an incident of a very trivial nature occurred which proved that no one else could ever be more rigid, prejudiced and narrow-minded than Mr. Modi. Apparently he was there in Nepal to attend the celebration of the birth of Gautam Buddha in Lumbini but critics say that this visit was something more than the promotion of religious and cultural ties; it must be viewed through the larger geopolitical lens. They are of the opinion that this visit was to give a clear-cut message to Nepal that country’s growing closeness to China is not acceptable to India.

Here the point to be noted is that today China has the world’s largest Buddhist population, with an estimated 185–250 million practitioners. Closeness with China could mean inclination towards Buddhism and certainly this closeness and inclination could never be acceptable to India. That is why Mr. Modi chose to land via helicopter on a helipad in Lumbini which is just 18 kilometers away from the Gautam Buddha International Airport. Gautam Buddha is the second international airport in Nepal built with Chinese assistance and support. Honourable Prime Minister of Nepal Sher Bahadur Deuba had inaugurated that airport the same day in the morning of 16th May when Mr. Modi landed in Lumbini. By avoiding landing on that newly inaugurated airport, Mr. Modi reflected his personal hesitance to endorse a Buddhist majority country China’s infrastructural activities in Nepal. Such type of narrow-mindedness could never be expected from the prime minister of a country which claims of being the Largest Secular Democracy.

IMF tells Sri Lanka to fight graft, raise taxes

June 30th, 2022

Courtesy The Daily Star

Sri Lanka should stamp out corruption and substantially raise taxes to rescue its economy, the International Monetary Fund said Thursday after bailout talks with the bankrupt island nation.

Representatives from the global lender of last resort have just concluded a 10-day visit to the capital Colombo to map out a resolution to the South Asian country’s unprecedented economic crisis.

Their meetings follow months of lengthy blackouts and days-long queues for petrol as a financial crunch leaves Sri Lanka without the funds to meet its energy needs.

But the IMF said more work was needed to set the nation’s finances right and repair its runaway fiscal deficit before a deal could be struck on a funding arrangement to address its balance of payments crisis.

A close look into Sri Lanka’s debt crisis: No ‘Chinese debt traps’

June 30th, 2022

By Hussein Askary Courtesy The Global Times

The global inflationary crisis in 2021 and more dramatically in 2022 triggered a Sri Lankan default on payment of $78 million in matured foreign bonds in April 2022. On May 18, the Central Bank of Sri Lanka declared that the country was in a preemptive default status. Political unrest followed as the government failed to provide fuel and imported food, prices have dramatically increased while the government’s ability to provide foreign currency to support continued imports dried up.

The Western and components of the Indian mainstream media, think tanks and research centers, and even many government officials have made the Sri Lankan Hambantota Port a globally known name and the main example of “China’s debt trap diplomacy,” although this was entirely proven to be a false story. As our own research and interviews with experts will show here, the entire story of China being the source of Sri Lanka’s debt is fake through and through.

Who own’s Sri Lanka’s External Debt? Two essential facts are ignored when the media in the West deal with the external debt of Sri Lank: the composition of the debt, and the real causes of the debt. Exactly as in the case of Pakistan, China’s share of the external public debt of Sri Lanka is only 10 percent. Western financial institutions, including the private credit markets, and their ally, Japan, hold the lion’s share of the debt.

According to the Sri Lankan Department of Foreign Resources, the composition in percentage terms of the foreign debt of Sri Lanka in April 2021 was as follows:

International capital market borrowing 47 percent, Asian Development Bank 13 percent, China 10 percent, Japan 10 percent, World Bank 9 percent, India 2 percent, and others 9 percent.

Thus, a simple look at the facts that usually ignored or blacked out shows that China is not what is being portrayed to be. The real culprits, as shown here in this article, are from the same Western countries, in which the “China debt trap” narrative was concocted.

First, borrowing in international capital markets: After a devastating civil war ending in 2009, the government resorted to expensive borrowing from international bond markets for the reconstruction process. These sovereign loans, from mostly Western financial investors like American BlackRock and British Ashmore constitute the greatest part of the external debt of the country (47 percent). It was the scramble to repay some of this debt, that matured in 2017, that pushed the Sri Lankan government to offer the Hambantota Port for lease. China accepted the offer in return for $790 million that was used to repay the debt to the international markets, not to China.

The bond market is a brutal, profit-seeking force that has a secondary market where investors sell the sovereign debt of troubled countries to so-called “vulture funds” that buy the debt with big discount from the investors to later demand full payment from the debtor nations. Repayments must be made on time, otherwise the country will be shut down from lending. The vulture funds sue sovereign debtors in UK and US courts where, under the threat of seizing the assets of those nations abroad, the courts usually judge in favor of these vulture funds.

Second, the trade deficit: Sri Lanka has a major dependency on imports of oil and gas and their refined products for transport and power generation. In recent years, the global prices have increased but in 2021-2022 skyrocketed. These items, in addition to fertilizers, constitute the most part of the imports of the country. In 2020, total exports were $10 billion, while imports stood at $16 billion ($6 billion deficit). In 2021, the deficit increased to $8 billion as exports amounted to $12 billion and imports $20 billion. Consequently, the current account deficit widened significantly to 4 percent of the GDP in 2021, compared to 1.5 percent of GDP registered in 2020.

Third, collapse of tourism sector: According to the Sri Lankan Tourism Authority, earnings from tourism have been the major contributor to the surplus in the services account for many years. The income, in foreign currency, and level of employment were substantial until their collapse.

First, the Easter terror attack by suicide bombers in April 2019 was a major setback for the tourism sector. A second disaster hit with the 2020 outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which reduced the number of tourists visiting the country to a trickle.

A look at the numbers gives a clear picture. Foreign tourism income reached $3.9 billion in 2017, $4.4 billion in 2018, $3.6 billion in 2019, $682 million in 2020, and $507 million in 2021.

The government supported the industry by compensating for the losses and avoids social and political unrest. The price the government paid was that borrowing increased internally and externally. It is important to note that the tourism sector has a large share of the labor force of Sri Lanka of 8 million workers (total population is 20 million).

Fourth, decline of remittances: Over the past two decades, annual remittances from Sri Lankan nationals abroad have represented nearly one-fourth of total credits to the external current account, on average, and exceptionally, this share exceeded more than one-third (35 percent) in 2020. The remittances declined from $7 billion in 2020 to $5 billion in 2021.

The government of Sri Lanka has been plagued by persistent fiscal deficits for decades, compelling the government to continually borrow from both domestic and foreign markets and in doing so accumulate public debt. As a result, a large fraction of government revenue and foreign currency inflows to the country are required for debt service payments, permitting little leeway for productive investments.

Increasing the productivity of the Sri Lankan economy represents the key solution. But this requires great investments in infrastructure, industrialization, and the modernization of the agricultural sector. Finding alternatives for the very expensive imports of petroleum products is one other very important element of the solution for Sri Lanka.

China does not have a magical wand to change the conditions of nations. The reason China managed to eliminate extreme poverty and build the world’s most productive economy is through hard work and massive investments in infrastructure and labor force through education.

China’s role in Sri Lanka is considered positive since it focuses on developing the productive aspects of the economy such as modernizing the infrastructure. Contrary to the “debt trap” narrative, China is not Sri Lanka’s largest creditor, but rather it is the largest foreign direct investor in the country. China’s investments in Sri Lanka are long-term projects that gradually increase the productivity of the economy. But they do not represent a quick fix.

What is needed from the US and Europe, rather than pushing the thoroughly debunked “debt trap” narrative against China, is to join hands with China and the Belt and Road Initiative to assist in rapidly raising the productive capabilities of Sri Lanka through investments and long-term, low interest credits for infrastructure projects, industries, and modern agricultural production.

The author is vice president of the Belt and Road Institute in Sweden. bizopinion@globaltimes.com.cn

A soup kitchen opens in Colombo to cope with hunger caused by the economic crisis

June 30th, 2022

by Melani Manel Perera Courtesy Asia News

Due to the situation, many Sri Lankans can no longer afford even one meal a day. Between 600 and 700 people show up at the community kitchen run by Rev Geeth Chamara De Silva. Talks for a credit line continue between Sri Lanka and the International Monetary Fund.

Colombo (AsiaNews) – Many people do bad things to quell their hunger, others commit suicide. Recently a father hanged himself because he had nothing to feed his children with while a mother threw her son into a river and then attempted suicide,” said Rev Geeth Chamara De Silva, pastor of the Assemblies of God Church in Kadawatha, a suburb of the capital Colombo.

“It is essential to provide food to the hungry, and even just one meal a day is a relief for those who suffer from hunger,” he explained.

Thanks to the support of many people, Rev Geeth Chamara De Silva set up a community kitchen a month ago at the Bethany Church and other churches in Rajagiriya, Negombo, Wattala, Matara, Ratnapura, Gampola, Batticaloa, Delft and Vavuniya. Between 600 and 700 people show up every day to receive a meal.

Since I have to go even to distant places to serve God, I have spoken to people who are suffering because of the economic crisis. They tell me that they survive on some fruit and boiling raw papaya. I saw tears in the eyes of parents desperately trying to feed their children.”

The community kitchen was made possible by the Voice Foundation, led by Father Moses, himself an orphan, who decided to devote his life to children after his seminary studies.

“Through the Voice Foundation we fight child abuse and meet the needs of the most vulnerable,” Rev Geeth Chamara explained.

“We provide mental care, medications and food in times of emergency, such as tsunamis and floods,” he noted. The community kitchen is an extension of this to make up for the difficulties created by the economic crisis.”

All aid is welcome. Donations can be made via the foundation’s account number on WhatsApp and Facebook.

One benefactor who preferred to remain anonymous told AsiaNews that “it was a great pleasure for me and my wife to be able to contribute” because food is man’s first need”.

Sumithra, one of the women using the kitchen in Kadawatha, said that she had difficulty getting food after her daughter-in-law’s death.

“Our neighbours occasionally donate something, but when I heard about this opportunity I rushed to the place. It’s a great blessing for people like us.”

Sri Lanka defaulted on its debt in mid-April, and is unable to import fuel and other necessities due to a lack of foreign currency.

For months, people have been protesting against the cost of living calling for the resignation of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. Meanwhile, Sri Lankan authorities and the International Monetary Fund are working on opening a credit line for the cash-strapped country.

Talks with Sri Lanka made significant progress, IMF mission team says

June 30th, 2022

Courtesy Adaderana

The talks with Sri Lankan authorities made significant progress” on defining a macroeconomic and structural policy package, the mission team of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said in a statement issued upon concluding its visit to the island nation.

An IMF mission team led by Peter Breuer and Masahiro Nozaki visited Colombo from June 20 to 30 to discuss the Fund’s support for Sri Lanka and the authorities’ comprehensive economic reform program.

Anne-Marie Gulde-Wolf, Deputy Director of the IMF’s Asia and Pacific Department, also participated in policy discussions.

In its statement, the IMF team reaffirmed commitment to support Sri Lanka at this difficult time in line with the IMF’s policies.

The team said it had constructive and productive discussions with the Sri Lankan authorities on economic policies and reforms to be supported by an IMF Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement.

The staff team and the authorities made significant progress on defining a macroeconomic and structural policy package, according to the statement. The discussions will continue virtually with a view to reaching a staff-level agreement on the EFF arrangement in the near term, it added.

The discussions focused on designing a comprehensive economic program to correct the macroeconomic imbalances, restore public debt sustainability, and realize Sri Lanka’s growth potential.

The focus of the talks also fell on the need to reduce the elevated fiscal deficit while ensuring adequate protection for the poor and vulnerable.

The IMF team stressed that far-reaching tax reforms are urgently required to achieve these objectives due to the low level of revenues. Other challenges that need addressing include containing rising levels of inflation, addressing the severe balance of payments pressures, reducing corruption vulnerabilities and embarking on growth-enhancing reforms, it noted.

According to the statement, the authorities have made considerable progress in formulating their economic reform program and the IMF team is looking forward to continuing the dialogue with them.

Read the IMF mission team’s full statement below:

Sri Lanka is going through a severe economic crisis. The economy is expected to contract significantly in 2022, while inflation is high and rising. The critically low level of foreign reserves has hampered the import of essential goods. During the in-person visit, the team witnessed some of the hardships currently faced by the Sri Lankan people, especially the poor and vulnerable who are affected disproportionately by the crisis. We reaffirm our commitment to support Sri Lanka at this difficult time in line with the IMF’s policies.

The authorities’ monetary, fiscal policy and other actions since early April were important first steps to address the crisis. The team had constructive and productive discussions with the Sri Lankan authorities on economic policies and reforms to be supported by an IMF Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement. The staff team and the authorities made significant progress on defining a macroeconomic and structural policy package. The discussions will continue virtually with a view to reaching a staff-level agreement on the EFF arrangement in the near term. Because public debt is assessed as unsustainable, Executive Board approval would require adequate financing assurances from Sri Lanka’s creditors that debt sustainability will be restored.

In this context, discussions focused on designing a comprehensive economic program to correct the macroeconomic imbalances, restore public debt sustainability, and realize Sri Lanka’s growth potential. Discussions advanced substantially during the mission, including on the need to reduce the elevated fiscal deficit while ensuring adequate protection for the poor and vulnerable. Given the low level of revenues, far-reaching tax reforms are urgently needed to achieve these objectives. Other challenges that need addressing include containing rising levels of inflation, addressing the severe balance of payments pressures, reducing corruption vulnerabilities and embarking on growth-enhancing reforms. The authorities have made considerable progress in formulating their economic reform program and we are looking forward to continuing the dialogue with them.

The IMF team held meetings with President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, Prime Minister and Finance Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, Central Bank of Sri Lanka Governor Dr. P. Nandalal Weerasinghe, Secretary to the Treasury K M Mahinda Siriwardana, and other senior government and CBSL officials. It also met with Parliamentarians, representatives from the private sector, civil society organizations, and development partners.

We would like to thank the authorities for the candid approach and warm hospitality and are looking forward to continuing our discussions in support of Sri Lanka and its people.”

Include SJB and JVP for food security prog – PM (Video)

June 30th, 2022

Courtesy Hiru News

Prime Minister Ranil Wickramasinghe instructed the officials to include the Samagi Janabalawegaya and the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna in the Cultivation program launched by the government to overcome the food crisis.

This was when the Committee on Food Security met today under the chairmanship of the Prime Minister


Copyright © 2025 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress