|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Who has a better right, to-day to lead and re-organize the SLFP, Mahinda Rajapakse, Chandrika Kumaratunga or Mangala Samaraweera ?By Charles PereraWhen SWRD Bandaranaike broke away from the UNP he was representing the Sinhala Mahasabha. He was keen in re-establishing Sinhala cultural values that had been eroded by colonialism. It was a fair and a just engagement, which was soon interpreted as nationalism. He was not against the Tamils, Muslims or other communities, but his education in UK made him understand the mental attitudes of the foreigners , therefore he wanted to remove, the colonial mentality that had been imbibed by the UNP leadership who found pleasure in imitating the Colonial masters, and to bring back religious and cultural values of the people, with the emphasis on the Sinhala majority , its culture and religion which had suffered the most under different colonial rulers. He did not agree with the pro Western attitude of the UNP, and wanted
to make a reality of the Independence of Sri Lanka, by bringing back
the lost values, and making the Independence more meaningful to the
ordinary man. SWRD stood for a non-revolutionary socialist policy, but opted to work with Marxist Parties. He was thus able to break away from the old colonial ties, and change the political scene from a pro Western capitalism to an Independent socialism. That was in short what SWRD stood for, and the SLFP which he had organised, was later brought into the larger political front the MEP and thus the SLFP he formed lost the personal colour he had infused into it. Therefore, no body could claim that the SLFP today is , the SLFP, SWRD Bandaranaike had formed in 1952, when he left the UNP. The SLFP he formed in 1952 has lost its Bandaranaiketouch since 1956. Those who claim to revive the SLFP as a heritage of the Bandaranaike family may be speaking of the old SLFP formed by SWRD in 1952, under which he fought the 1952 elections and lost. That was also the end of the original SLFP. The Present SLFP therefore has no family connection. Neither Mangala Samarawickrama, nor Chandrika Kumaratunga could claim the present SLFP as a heritage left behind by Mr.SWRD Bandaranaike. Least of all is the Mangala Samaraweeras claim to revive the old Party. The SLFP is to day the party of the people without any one having the right to claim it as his or hers. Mahinda Rajapakses father DA Rajapakse was one of the founder
members along with SWRD of the original SLFP. DA Rajapakse did not leave
the party, to join the UNP at any stage of his political carrier. Mahinda
Rajapakse followed his fathers foot steps and remained in the
SLFP through its hay days, as well as well as the difficult days it
traversed. Chandrika Kumaratunga, came half way through into the party
having rebelled against her mother the then leader of the SLFP. Mangala
Samaraweeras father on the other hand left the SLFP to join the
UNP, and to day the son Mangala like his father seeks the help of UNP.
Under these circumstances who can claim the just right to revive SLFP,
Mangala Samaraweera, Chandrika Kumaratunga or Mahinda Rajapakse ? Non of the previous governments of the UNP or the SLFP had made any effort to develop the South . The development was restricted to Colombo, Kandy, Trnicomalee, Anuradhapura or Jaffna. Galle, Matara, Hambantota were areas completely neglected. Thanks to the President Mr. Mahinda Rajapakse, the South of Sri Lanka is at last considered for several developement projects. Mangala Samaraweeras as well as Chandrika Kumaratungas
political days are over. The right thinking people will understand that
the future lies with the Mahinda Rajapakse and his brothers, as the
priority to-day is freeing Sri Lanka from the gips of terrorism. It
is once that cancer of terrorism is removed, that Sri Lanka could look
forward to equitable devolution of political power, end of violations
of human rights and corruption, end economic inequality, and take up
different facets of development. |
||||||||||||
|
Disclaimer: The comments contained
within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents
of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the
views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual
authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any
loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which
you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or
reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site.
Copyright
© 1997-2004 www.lankaweb.Com
Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved. |