CLASSIFIED | POLITICS | TERRORISM | OPINION | VIEWS





 .
 .

 .
 .
.
 

Rajapakse?s Economic Ruination

Dilrook Kannangara

Financial ruination is what the nation is experiencing today. The task of the patriots is not to blindly support the government but to put effective pressure on it to change cause. If not by the time we have won the war, the economy would have bled the country to death, not so much due to acts of terrorism, but due to irresponsible financial mismanagement by the same administration that is fighting the war.

Extreme waste
It is no doubt that the foreign reserves are straining out to finance the 44% increase in defence spending and other superfluous spending initiatives. The jumbo cabinet costs an additional 650 million rupees a year. Although it is better than having elections which would cost at least 30 billion rupees plus continued political instability, 650 million is a colossal amount especially considering the fact that there is no corresponding development work. Ultra luxury vehicles are imported for no benefit for the country and its industries. What is worse is that it is the likes of Rizana who pay for these crap out of their sweat, blood and life. This is a very pathetic situation and must be redressed immediately. How can one reconcile this nonsense with the aspirations of SLFP’s five forces (clergy, teachers, medical workers, farmers and laborers)? Simply the five forces will desert the government pretty soon. Already sections of these groups have aired their anger at the extreme waste of the government. If the UNP’s newly formed peasants’ group swells its membership, the SLFP has only its leader to blame.

Financial mismanagement
There is no sense whatsoever to impose additional taxes outside the budget to cover-up the misdeeds of financial mismanagement. Its will further aggravate the situation as the tax money in the pockets of the people would do much more good than in the government coffers. Add to this the enormous administration cost of these new taxes, it makes it ridiculously wasteful. One may even wonder whether the Rajapakse administration is actually and deliberately following a strategy of financial ruination!

Replacing wheat with rice flour
In economic terms this will give a huge saving on foreign exchange outgoings. However, this cannot happen overnight and we have seen similar campaigns collapse silently over the past decades. In the absence of any real financial returns (increased profit and cashflow) for the farmers, it is unlikely that any such ambitious project would work. What needs to be replaced is waste. However, in the same token the reawakening of the Paddy Marketing Board should be appreciated. If managed on commercial terms, this can cut a lot of fat in the retail trade of rice. On the other hand if it ends up an ‘ambalam(a)’ (a sanctuary for the unemployable) then it would create yet another public burden.

Taxing the votebase
Another fatal mistake committed by the present administration is to impose taxes on creature comforts branding them as luxuries. The absurdity of the new tax regime is heightened by the flat charges it imposes irrespective of usage. This is likely to be a major obstacle in sustaining the support from SLFP votebases. Instead what the government should have done was to impose taxes with minimum political repercussions on the ruling party. The present administration has a lot to learn from the UNP; when the UNP was in power they ensured that new tax systems did not burden their particular voters to a significant degree. Cutting the fertilizer subsidies, dissolving the Paddy Marketing Board, tax amnesty for the tax defaulters (mostly top rung UNPers), politicized Janasaviya/ Samurdi /land distribution projects are good examples. No wonder the UNP has a rock solid votebase.

Other forms of waste/corruption
Consumption related subsidies must be phased out over time; these add a very heavy burden on the economy. Public sector reforms are a necessity though forced upon us by the World Bank and IMF. Employing unemployable graduates costed the economy a few billion rupees a year. What is more corrupt is taxing productive salary and income earners to feed the heavy government payroll. If 60% of all government taxes go into salaries, there must be something very seriously wrong with the administration.

How independent is the Governor of the Central Bank?
This was asked by a prominent banker recently. Now it is upto the economists to ask this. As a very accomplished accountant, the preset Governor should have reason to believe that the economy is in doldrums and worse, things are likely to get worse if we continue like this. Then why is all this false optimism in his views? Is he still a politician crossed over to the SLFP from the UNP? If so there is no point having him as the Governor of the Central Bank, he should rather get back to politics.

This may lead to a serious credibility issue concerning the country’s monetary and fiscal management body which will in turn have dire consequences.

The corruption barometer and Transparency International
Transparency International uses a ‘corruption barometer’ to rank countries. This is not actual corruption but the public perception of corruption. Therefore it is about media and the publicity given by them to actual and alleged corruption. It is a fact that most corruption allegations are nothing but personal character tarnishing endeavors against government bigwigs without any proof. If actual corruption is suspected, anyone can lodge a complaint at the Bribery and Corruption Commission. None of the exuberant corruption charges made by Laxman Keriella has been taken to the Commission! If the UNP is serious about these charges they can do so without mere publicity stunts. On the other hand making false allegations must be punished severely.

However, it is of paramount importance to keep a clean public image by the government because it affects the ‘corruption barometer’ (public opinion about corruption). This index is used by many foreign investors, financiers, NGOs, donors and many others for decision making. They do not go behind the ownership of Sri Lankan media institutions and their political aspirations. If false allegations are punished and actual acts of corruption is kept low, corruption could be tackled more efficiently.

UNP is no alternative
However, the UNP is no viable alternative for the SLFP-led government. In fact bulk of corruption found by COPE relates to UNP times and the UNP has been worse of the two parties in mismanaging foreign aid. It still has a stake in cost of living via its big time financiers. Its biggest financiers use huge price increases they have levied on milk powder, retail trade, bus fares, etc. to bolster the UNP financially. They have no regard for the COL or the suffering public; in fact they benefit from both the huge profits and public anger towards the government. In the unfortunate event of them coming into power, expect much more inflation. Else they would cross-over to the SLFP!!

How to correct the government
The corrupt in the government must be punished; a movement within the government should commence demanding the punishment of these unscrupulous elements, else defection. This must be started before the opportunity is exploited by the UNP and its new leader - Chandrika. The JVP can exert pressure on the government especially at the time of the budget; a precondition for its support at the budget should be sizable elimination of corruption and waste. Failure to correct after such light measures should lead to public disobedient campaigns with abstinence to pay taxes on the ground that it is against natural justice to pay for corruption. If this sounds serious and illegal, that is exactly the point; corruption and waste is serious and illegal.



Disclaimer: The comments contained within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site.
All views and opinions presented in this article are solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of LankaWeb.com. .

BACK TO LATEST NEWS

DISCLAIMER

Copyright © 1997-2004 www.lankaweb.Com Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reproduction In Whole Or In Part Without Express Permission is Prohibited.