SRI LANKA UNITED NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
CANADA
Box 55292, 300 Borough Drive, Toronto, Ontario M1P 4Z7 Canada
Website: www.sluna.org E-mail:
sluna@idirect.com
Transmitted by E-mail January 12, 2007
(Printed copy sent by Regular Mail)
His Excellency, Mr. Ban Ki-moon
Secretary General
United Nations Organization
First Avenue at 46th Street
New York, NY 10017
Your Excellency,
Open Letter on Sri Lanka,
UN Agencies and UN Officials
We would firstly like to congratulate you on your successful bid
to become the eighth Secretary General of the United Nations Organization,
and wish you boundless energy and wisdom in achieving much needed
peace and sustainable development within the community of nations
which has placed immense trust in you. We also wish to state that
we are extremely pleased that the task of charting new approaches
and courses of action to achieve the common goals of the people of
the world has been entrusted to a fellow Asian who has been nurtured
in the ancient philosophies that have contributed to the peaceful
evolution of material advancement based on harmonious values within
an all embracing spiritual framework that has withstood the test of
time.
We are a community association of Canadians of Sri Lankan origin,
who are particularly concerned about the wellbeing of the people of
our motherland of Sri Lanka. This land which is the National Homeland
of the Hela people, later known as the Sinhala or Sinhalese, have
a recorded history of over 2500 years and a rich pre-history which
is coming into focus as seen from recent archaeological studies which
are yet in its preliminary stages. The Hela Nation or the Sinhala
people have allowed others who came peacefully to settle down in their
land, including Tamils from South India who arrived about the 12th
century AD, whose National Homeland is the State of Tamilnadu where
over 55 million Tamils live. Yet other Tamils arrived later as indentured
labour brought in by the Dutch and British colonial powers from about
the 18th to the 20th centuries, for work on plantations established
on lands confiscated from the indigenous Sinhala people without any
payment of compensation. Yet others of Arabic descent, Indonesian
and Malaysian origin, and the descendants of the European colonial
powers made Sri Lanka their home.
Today, Sri Lanka is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious nation, made
up of Sinhalese numbering around 77.5 percent, the Sri Lankan Tamils
who immigrated earlier accounting for about 8.5 percent having diminished
their numbers from 12.8 percent following large scale emigration to
the western countries, Indian Tamils who arrived as indentured labour
more recently numbering around 5.5 percent, Moors (Muslims) making
up 8.0 percent and all others representing about 0.5 percent of the
total population estimated at close to 19 million people. Sri Lanka
has given a great deal of recognition to her minorities making Tamil
an official language and bringing it on a par with Sinhala spoken
by the majority, and further declared national holidays to mark special
religious and cultural events celebrated by the minority communities.
The National Constitution has by its Fundamental Rights Chapter bestowed
equal status to all her citizens including the grant of all civic
and human rights, the freedom of worship, and all other rights as
available to citizens of any other country.
As you may perhaps be aware, the minority Tamil community numbering
approximately 11 percent of the population in the late 1940s,
benefited from the better educational facilities and other privileges
provided to them during the British colonial era lasting 133 years
till 1948, came to play a dominant role in every field of activity
in colonial Sri Lanka (Ceylon). They sought a special arrangement
of power sharing from the colonial administration after the departure
of the British, but even the British rejected their demands and instead
the Soulbury Commission recommended the grant of voting rights to
all persons over 21 years of age at the time of granting independence,
which naturally transferred a greater share of power to the majority
Sinhala community in the newly established parliamentary democracy.
This change diminished the hitherto dominant role played by the Tamil
minority giving rise to Tamil separatist movements that are even today
engaged in an armed insurgency extending over 25 years, seeking recognition
of their community as a second Tamil Nation (in addition to the Tamil
Nation which controls the territory of the State of Tamilnadu in Southern
India) thereby attempting to forcibly grab territory belonging to
Sri Lanka in the north and east of the island to establish a racist
separate state, comprising 30 percent of the land and 66 percent of
the coastline and adjacent territorial waters for Tamils numbering
less than 4.0 percent of the islands population resident in
the region.
We find that the Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora with the support of other
Tamil groups are carrying on a campaign internationally to win support
for their territorial ambitions, based on a recently invented history
that speaks of traditional homelands of Tamils within Sri Lankas
terrain, and vicious propaganda carrying false statements aimed at
hostility towards the Sinhalese people and the Sri Lankan state. We
are aware that such propaganda campaigns are being actively carried
on both openly and in a subtle manner by the pro-Tamil lobby even
within the United Nations Organization. We have been struck by clearly
biased decisions being taken by United Nations officials handling
the Sri Lanka file, who have apparently been influenced by the ongoing
propaganda of the
Tamil separatist movement seeking the division of this country.
We are aware of certain recommendations made by UN Agencies such
as the UNHCR in the case of re-settlement of internally displaced
persons, where priority and special treatment was extended to members
of the Tamil community ignoring the affected people from the Sinhala
and Muslim communities with the least concern towards the Sinhalese,
who have been driven out of their homesteads on account of ethnic
cleansing massacres and attacks carried out by the internationally
designated terrorist group known as the Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Eelam (LTTE). Part of the reason could be the disproportionate number
of Tamils hired by the various UN Agencies operating in Sri Lanka.
The UNICEF is yet another agency that depends on an official, one
Penney Bourne, who has lived in the un-cleared areas illegally held
by the Tamil Tiger Terrorists for the past ten years even though her
contract allows her to serve only three years at one station, where
she is known to soften the blame in connection with the abduction
of children to be enlisted as child soldiers, or the forced military
training given to the captive civilian population in areas controlled
by the LTTE.
We have been shocked to hear UN officials, I-NGOs, NGOs and even
members of the Nordic Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission (SLMM) uttering
excuses to shield the offending Tamil Tiger Terrorists and even making
a case for their need to forcibly enlist child soldiers to replenish
their depleting fighting units, without strongly condemning such acts
which are deemed war crimes as per UN Conventions covering the use
of children in armed conflict. Their statements makes one wonder as
to whether their sympathies were with the child abductors and not
the innocent children who have been torn away from their parents or
guardians whom they are required to protect.
The recent visit of Ambassador Allan Rock who was assigned the task
of visiting Sri Lanka by the United Nations Special Representative
for Children and Armed Conflict, Madam Radhika Coomaraswamy, herself
an ethnic Tamil, to report on the use of child soldiers and the violence
occurring as a result of the Tamil Tiger Terrorist insurgency in that
country, was heard to make absurd and unfounded statements alleging
complicity by Sri Lankas Security Forces in the abduction of
some 135 children by the Karuna faction which had broken off from
the LTTE terrorist movement in 2004, on his short ten day visit based
on village gossip or stories planted by the LTTE. What is alarming
is that he gave scant attention in his public statements to the continued
abduction of children by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE),
which according to UNICEF had abducted in excess of 5200 children
since the signing of the ceasefire agreement of February 2002. It
is disappointing to say the least that the special emissary failed
to recommend any measures or sanctions against the LTTE which had
earlier given a pledge to the UN Special Representative, Olara Otunnu,
to release the thousands of child recruits in their fighting ranks,
and openly scorned the UN as an ineffective body entrusted with the
task of protecting the rights of innocent children. The LTTE had even
taken funds from UNICEF to establish half-way homes to rehabilitate
the released child soldiers, the larger portion of which funds they
had misappropriated, thereby acting with utter contempt, ignoring
their undertaking to Mr. Otunnu.
Ambassador Allan Rock seemed to naively accept a fresh position announced
by the LTTE to the effect that under new policies adopted by them,
they were arranging to release all of their child soldiers by January
2007. This is all he reported in his public interviews with regard
to the involvement of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
in the crimes they continued to commit against innocent children and
their families, as though he was confident that the LTTE would honour
their pledge this time around. We are left to conclude that Ambassador
Rock was either instructed to or naively on his own as a former Cabinet
Minister of the Liberal Party Government in Canada, which shielded
the LTTEs Canadian fronts ignoring the advice of Canadas
intelligence services, as the party benefited from the votes of the
Tamil Diaspora in the Greater Toronto Area, decided to invent a case
against the Sri Lankan Governments Security Forces to draw attention
away from the main offender, i.e. the LTTE.
We would like to remind you that Sri Lanka has been a member of the
United Nations Organization since its inception. Despite its size
and limited economy, Sri Lanka has contributed greatly to develop
consensus and agreement on a variety of vital issues such as World
Trade, Law of the Seas, WIPO, Nuclear Non-Proliferation, Prevention
of Financing of Terrorism, etc. Sri Lanka is a free, independent and
sovereign country and not a UN administered territory. It has been
our perception that a large number of the UN Officials and Agencies
serving in developing countries tend to act with the old colonial
mentality and attempt to dictate solutions as they see fit, as though
they were specialists in all fields and had answers to every problem
even before they grasped the specific issues in the respective countries
to which they were assigned to serve the member country concerned.
We look upon such officials with utter disdain, and consider that
they do a great disservice and harm to the effectiveness of the United
Nations Organization.
We finally wish to state that Sri Lanka has already made six attempts
in the last two decades to deal directly or negotiate with the help
of international mediators and facilitators with the intransigent
and ruthless terrorist group known as the Liberation Tigers of Eelam
(LTTE), who seek nothing short of dismembering Sri Lanka on ethnic
lines which would result in greater chaos and violence. Sri Lanka
needs to reign in the misguided terror group and quickly bring an
end to the terrorist menace, to usher in a stable and lasting peace
that her citizens of all communities seek.
We would like to once again wish you well, and trust that you would
achieve much success in building a climate of peace and a safer environment
for all living beings during your term of holding the high office
of Secretary General. We wish to extend our highest assurance that
our cooperation can be counted upon in your efforts to reach these
goals.
Yours very truly,
Mahinda Gunasekera
Honorary President