CLASSIFIED | POLITICS | TERRORISM | OPINION | VIEWS

The big B of journalism in Sri Lanka

Ron Silva

Dear Sunanda Desapriya (the Big B),

I would like to address you as the big b of journalism in Sri Lanka. It would be better if I say 'Mudalata Kahina Pattara Karaya'. I refer to your folllowing letter.

Government Minister admits to cyber-terrorism:
Attempts to hack Tamilnews website
21st June 2007, Colombo, Sri Lanka:

The Free Media Movement (FMM) unequivocally condemns the outrageous statement by Minister Keheliya Rambukwella, as reported by the BBC’s Sinhala Service and by AFP today, that he would love to hire hackers to disable Tamilnet, but had not found anyone yet for the job.

Minister Rambukwella’s statement is tantamount to Government sanctioned cyber-terrorism against websites that do not toe its line. The reference to the use of hackers to shut down websites is a strategy that offensively transgresses the responsibility to protect fundamental rights of citizens, including the freedom of expression and the right to information, by a Government Minister. The Minister’s statement also puts him at cross purposes with the Computer Crimes Bill enacted in Sri Lanka earlier this year, holding him culpable under the law for attempting to hack into a website with the intent to cause disruption.

The FMM seeks urgent clarification from the Government as to whether Minister Rambukwella’s comments are indicative of official Government policy to shutdown, disrupt or censor content and websites on the Internet. If not, the FMM seeks a full retraction from the Minister and reiterates that the Government must immediately unblock access to Tamilnet in Sri Lanka .

Sunanda Deshapriya
Convenor
Free Media Movement

You are in a haste to issue this when your fellow so called media terrorists break your own code of ethics. Recentle another media terrorist (lanka Enews) publish this following article.

Majority fails O/L examination; education Minister's daughter included

(LeN-2007 June 18, 7.50 pm) The Ordinary Level examination is one of the crucial examinations in the country which decides the future education of the children but it is sad to note that 52.7% of the applicants who sat for the exam have failed it. According to statistics issued by the Examinations commissioner General Anura Edirisinghe 21,813 students have not passed a single language.

But the latest information is that Education Minister's daughter has also failed the examination. She is being educated in one of the top most schools in Colombo 04.

Statistics issued by the examinations department say 57.3% of the students have failed the Maths exam.

It says that Ministers' duaghter failed. You have a code of ethics clause no. 7.1 (See Below). Why are you keeping quiet when your own people break the code of ethics. I need your reply whether that article break or not breaking your so called FMM code of ethics. If you are really honest guy speak and send me the reply.

Before talking about the terrorsit think about your mother land. You have done so much traitor activities in the past. Calling BBC, AFP and conducting interviews in the name of so called CPP.

Are you a Sri Lankan? Are you a traitor?

Help the government forces to beat the terrorsit.

I am a catholic. Currently I live outside Sri Lanka. I am not a member of any political party. I am a Sri Lankan. So, Sunanda, think about the country and think twice before you open your dirty mouth.

Tamilnet is a terror site. It needs to be destroyed or stopped. It is the opinion of all the patriot Sri Lankan world wide. It gives wrong and very dangerour infor. The misinfo carried by Tamilnet affect our sovereignity and security of Sri Lanka.

Ron

FREE MEDIA MOVEMENT ETHICS

1. PREAMBLE
This code of practice which is binding on all Press institutions and journalists, aims to ensure that the print medium in Sri Lanka is free and responsible and sensitive to the needs and expectations of its readers, while maintaining the highest international standard of journalism.

Those standards require newspapers to strive for accuracy and professional integrity, and to uphold the best traditions of investigative journalism in the public interest, unfettered by distorting commercialism or by improper pressure or by narrow self-interest which conspires against press freedom. Newspapers and journalists, while free to hold and express their own strong opinions, should give due consideration to the views of others and endeavour to reflect social responsibility.
This code both protects the rights of the individual and upholds the public’s right to know. It should be honoured not only to the letter but in the spirit – neither interpreted so narrowly as to compromise its commitment to respect the rights of the individual nor so broadly as to prevent publication in the public interest.

2. ACCURATE REPORTING
2.1 The media must take all reasonable care to report news and pictures accurately and without distortion.
2.2 Every reasonable attempt should be made by editors and individual journalists to verify the accuracy of reports prior to publication. Where such verification is not practicable, that fact shall be stated in the report.
2.3 Editors and their staff, including external contributors, shall not publish material in such a way as to endorse any matter which they know or have reason to believe to be false or inaccurate.
2.4 Publications are encouraged to engage in investigative journalism in the public interest.

3. CORRECTIONS and APOLOGIES

Where it is recognized by the editor that a report was incorrect in a material respect, it should be corrected promptly and with due prominence and with an apology where appropriate, except where the correction or apology is against the wishes of the aggrieved party.

4. OPPORTUNITY TO REPLY

4.1 A fair and reasonable opportunity to reply should be given to individuals or organizations in respect of factually incorrect statements endangering their reputation, dignity, honour, feelings, privacy and office. The reply should be confined to the complainant’s version of the facts and no longer than necessary to correct the alleged inaccuracy.
4.2 Newspapers or journalists who respond to a complainant’s reply other than to apologize or regret the error, must then be prepared to offer the aggrieved party a fresh opportunity to reply.

5. CONFIDENTIAL SOURCES

Every journalist has a moral obligation to protect confidential sources of information, until that source authorizes otherwise.

6. GENERAL REPORTING and WRITING

6.1 In dealing with social issues of a particularly shocking or emotionally painful nature – such as atrocity, violence, drug abuse, brutality, sadism, sexual salacity and obscenity – the press should take special care to present facts, opinions, photographs and graphics with due sensitivity and discretion, subject to its duty to publish in the public interest.
6.2 In reporting accounts of crime or criminal case, publications shall not, unless it is both legally permitted and in the public interest –
i Name victims of sex crimes
ii knowingly name any young person accused of a criminal offense who is below the age of 16 and who has no previous convictions

iii Identify without consent relatives of a person accused or convicted of a crime

6.3 A journalist shall not knowingly or wilfully promote communal or religious discord or violence.
6.4 i The press must avoid prejudicial or pejorative reference to a person’s race,
colour, religion, sex or to any physical or mental illness or disability.
ii It must avoid publishing details of a person’s race, caste, religion, sexual orientation, physical or mental illness or disability unless these are directly relevant to the story

6.5 i Even where the law does not prohibit it, journalists must not use for their own profit financial information they receive in advance of its general publication, nor should they pass such information for the profit of others.
ii They must not write about shares or securities in whose performance they know that they or their close families have a significant financial interest, without disclosing the interest to the publisher, editor or financial editor.

7. PRIVACY

7.1 The press shall exercise particular care to respect the private and family lives of individuals, their home, health and correspondence. Intrusions on this right to privacy without consent, could be justified only by some over-riding public interest.
7.2 The use of long-lens or other cameras to photograph people without consent on private or public property where there is a reasonable expectation or privacy is unacceptable, unless in the public interest.
7.3 Particular care should be taken to ensure that in cases involving grief or shock, inquiries and approaches are handled with sensitivity and discretion.
7.4 Young people should be free to complete their school years without unnecessary intrusion. Publication of material concerning a child’s private life would be acceptable only if there was some exceptional public interest other than the fame, notoriety or position of his or her family or guardian.
7.5 The restrictions on intruding into privacy are particularly relevant to inquiries about individuals in hospitals or similar institutions, unless it serves the public interest.

8. HARASSMENT and SUBTERFUGE

Journalists, including photo-journalists, must not seek to obtain information or pictures through intimidation or harassment or by misrepresentation or subterfuge. The use of long-lens cameras or listening devices, must also not be used unless this can be justified in the public interest and the material could not have been obtained by other means.

9. DIGINITY

Every journalist shall maintain the dignity of his profession.

INTERPRETATION

The public interest includes:

Protecting democracy, good governance, freedom of expression and the fundamental rights of the people and of keeping them informed about events that would have a direct or indirect bearing on them, and that of their elected government, and detecting or exposing crime, corruption, maladministration or a serious misdemeanor.

Disclaimer: The comments contained within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site.
All views and opinions presented in this article are solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of LankaWeb.com. .

BACK TO LATEST NEWS

DISCLAIMER