|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Sri Lanka's Civil Society Organizations: Shady Techniques and Bribes to the Tigers?Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha’s
Rajiva Wijesinha, Senior Professor of Languages
at Sabaragamuwa University is the Secretary General of the Secretariat
for Coordinating the Peace Process (SCOPP). He obtained his first degree
in Classics from University College, Oxford, and went on to do a doctorate
in English at Corpus Christi College, where he held the
E K Chambers Studentship. He is the author of several books including:
Declining Sri Lanka: Terrorism and Ethnic Violence as the legacy of J
R Jayewardene, 1906-1996, Cambridge University Press Delhi, July 2007.
|
||||||||||||
|
This was a UNDP grant, signed for by Bradman Weerakoon, Secretary
to the Prime Minister and Commissioner General for the Coordination
of Relief, Rehabilitation and Reconciliation, and also by our
External Resources Department. The agreement was signed on 19th
December 2003, and in critiquing it I should make it crystal clear
that I do not blame the UNDP for signing or acting on such an
agreement, since it was clearly a project that had government
approval. The answer may be connected with a mindset that has tried to declare that Mahinda Rajapakse won the Presidential election only by offering millions to the Tigers. I have long believed that, when people make outrageous charges, whether or not in good faith, this is generally because the practices they highlight are those they themselves are used to. And here, to my mind, was proof of this, for what Bradman Weerakoon was signing for, presumably on behalf of the Prime Minister who had appointed him to such exalted positions, was a project designed to provide over 20 million rupees worth of goods and services to the LTTE Peace Secretariat. |
“And here, to my mind, was proof of this, for what Bradman Weerakoon was signing for, presumably on behalf of the Prime Minister who had appointed him to such exalted positions, was a project designed to provide over 20 million rupees worth of goods and services to the LTTE Peace Secretariat. The whole project was for $600,000 (c. 60 million rupees), of which over a third was for the LTTE Secretariat. The same amount was in theory for the government Peace Secretariat, but nearly two thirds of that was for civil society organizations. There was also about 9 million for a Muslim Peace Advisory Unit, which then seems to have been housed in the Prime Minister’s office, 4 million for joint activities, and the rest for management. Whether the initiative came from Bradman or his master or someone else, it was a masterly stroke. Not only do you in effect give Rs 20 million to the LTTE just before an election, you make the poor UN do this so that you suffer no loss yourself.” |
The whole project was for $600,000 (c. 60 million rupees), of which over a third was for the LTTE Secretariat.The same amount was in theory for the government Peace Secretariat, but nearly two thirds of that was for civil society organizations.
There was also about 9 million for a Muslim Peace Advisory Unit, which
then seems to have been housed in the Prime Minister's office, 4 million
for joint activities, and the rest for management.
Whether the initiative came from Bradman or his master or someone else,
it was a masterly stroke. Not only do you in effect give Rs 20 million
to the LTTE just before an election, you make the poor UN do this so
that you suffer no loss yourself.
I should note that I say advisedly that these funds were given in effect to the LTTE. The project document claims that the LTTE planned to set up regional and district Peace Secretariats, a claim also repeated to SCOPP even later, in requesting SCOPP assistance with providing vehicles. We have no record of such Secretariats, and the UN indeed now notes that 'this activity has not taken place to-date'.
However I have been told by the SLMM, though without certainty, that they believe one or two such secretariats were set up, but functioned as such only briefly before being turned into political offices. And leaving that aside, as has been made crystal clear in many instances, the LTTE simply did not bother to maintain any distinction between its various agencies or claim that any of them were independent. In a dispensation in which all law are made with the approval of the National Leader, there can be no doubt that the various institutions that benefited from this grant were under the direct control of the LTTE and its leader.
Further information is currently being sought re the modalities of distribution, but before the project ground to a halt basically over $133,000 worth of goods and services were provided to the LTTE Peace Secretariat or to institutions functioning under its aegis. Amongst services rendered was the development of its website, the website that now features suicide squads posing proudly with the Leader before being sent out on missions of destruction. I can only hope that the UN, like other donors, will at least indicate that this is unacceptable, and such militaristic propaganda should be removed from a website supposedly promoting peace, not war.
Beneficiaries in the south
But what has all this to do with nice, gentle Prof Uyangoda? The point is, I believe he too was a beneficiary of this wonderful project. Not him personally, for I believe he is not the sort to derive personal benefits from the various projects he administers. He, like me, and unlike so many others, probably never claims compensation for the time and effort he puts into the management or administration of the many projects he has led in his time.
But certainly the organization he led at one stage, with which he is still closely associated, the Social Scientists Association of Sri Lanka, seems to have received a Service Contract for over $14,000 for the principal joint activity of 2004.
I may be wrong, but I hope soon to find out more about what this was, and which other institutions and individuals benefited from the project.
But, pending this, I should record other instances of what might be termed peace largesse which has hugely benefited Civil Society Organisations (the CSOs as the UN review puts it). Engaging and engaged Mr Chilcott told me when we first met that their assistance to promote peace was delivered largely through such organizations. Initially these had been, I believe he mentioned, principally the Centre for Policy Alternatives and the Foundation for Co-Existence. They did not work so much with the former now, he said, but work with the latter still continued, and they did a lot too with FLICT.
Interestingly, though I believe FLICT is more objective than most, and has proportionately smaller administrative costs, they had not shared with Mr Chilcott a review I had done of their work when, after a preparatory stage, they were moving on to bigger things. That review, which I had been commissioned to do out of the blue, was perhaps more radical in its critique than they were comfortable with, for I was not, as initially envisaged, invited for meetings to develop focuses for new work.
|
My critique suggested, to put it very simply, that the same people continued to engage in research and advocacy, to what seemed very little purpose. Awareness raising by itself seemed to me of little use, whereas I thought concerted action with regard say to language development would be more productive. I was pleased to discover that one of my predecessors too as Secretary General of SCOPP was dubious about the value of exercises such as street theatre to promote peace, though that was why perhaps he did not seem to have been consulted in the implementation of Bradman Weerakoon's little fandango (or, rather, large one, for about 7 million rupees seems, unless there was substantial redeployment, to have been spent on sub contracts for street theatre productions). |
“..And so the project
document I have before me now, and the record of disbursements
to many institutes and other beneficiaries, suggests why Prof
Uyangoda and his ilk find my approach, and that of the present
government, so irritating.”
|
But this sort of activity is what our beauties seem to have been engaged
in on this side as it were, without much reference to SCOPP itself.
The project document refers twice to the "Peace Confidence Index:
Survey conducted by the Centre for Policy Alternatives'. It refers elsewhere
to the 'information dissemination campaigns on the peace process' being
conducted by civil society groups, and cites the Centre for Policy Alternatives,
the National Peace Council, the Consortium for Humanitarian Agencies
and other grassroots organizations like Sarvodaya (in fairness to Sarvodaya,
I should note that I am not sure of the applicability of the word 'other'
here to the other organizations mentioned in connections with grassroots;
in fairness to CHA too I should add that its primary role is that of
coordination of various entities, many of which do have a very practical
role to play).
Now none of these organizations, and the many others in the field,
function for free. They have to raise funds and, in particular for those
who deal not in practical outcomes but in unquantifiable abstracts,
what might be termed the Bradman Weerakoon mindset was much more favourable.
And so the project document I have before me now, and the record of
disbursements to many institutes and other beneficiaries, suggests why
Prof Uyangoda and his ilk find my approach, and that of the present
government, so irritating.
But in fact they should be thankful.
To my mind the government has been far too slow to look into the various projects approved with regard to what is termed peace building over the past decade. Norbert Ropers of the Berghof for instance, someone who seems to me comparatively sincere, told me himself about an organization he had helped the LTTE set up in Switzerland, hoping that it would contribute to the peace process. It was that organization, functioning without reference now it seems to the Berghof, that had arranged a Sri Lanka bashing meeting in Geneva to coincide with the last session of the Human Rights Council, a meeting at which the usual suspects, Sunila Abeysekera and Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu and various LTTE activists had criticized the government, without inviting anyone who might have replied. The irony is that many of the institutions involved, much of the funding for travel of the individuals concerned, had come out of grants approved by our External Resources Department, at the behest of various politicians.
The restrictions of the past
This is all a far cry from what used to happen in the eighties, the
period in which there was in fact monolithic government control of everything,
though today's not very clearsighted idealists think of one of the leading
lights of that regime as their standard bearer. The principal CSO at
the time was the Marga Institute, headed by Godfrey Gunatilleke. Its
main interests were socio-economic, and in that respect its thinking
coincided generally with that of the government. However it did have
a distinguished legal section too, headed I believe by Neelan Tiruchelvam,
with Radhika Coomaraswamy also cutting her teeth there initially.
That section started a series of seminars on the more oppressive constitutional amendments of the Jayewardene government, and some outspoken critiques were heard.
|
Then the series suddenly stopped. The hierarchy gave various
excuses, but Radhika, who was more frank than most, told us that,
after the seminar on the abortive third amendment, Lalith Athulathmudali
had asked to see Marga's articles of association. Godfrey, she
said, had panicked, and the legal section was curbed. Shortly afterwards Neelan and Kingsley de Silva set up the International
Centre for Ethnic Studies, and Radhika moved there as Executive
Director. To my surprise, ICES did nothing about rising ethnic
tensions in the country, not even after the burning of the Jaffna
Public Library, the preposterous motion of no-confidence in the
then leader of the opposition Mr Amirthalingam, and the attacks
on Tamils nationwide (except in Colombo) in which government politicians
were involved. Once again it was Radhika who let the cat out of the bag, in saying that ICES had been allowed to set up in Colombo on condition that they kept quiet about the situation in Sri Lanka.
|
“ To give Radhika her due, the events of 1983 emboldened her finally, and she brought out with logistic support from ICES a publication that set out very clearly the context of the ethnic violence of the time. Yet again, typically, doubtless to keep the Board happy, the publication was through something called the Committee for Rational Development, and Dayan Jayatilleka had to take the lead. That was when I first met him, and it is the memory of his courage then, albeit courage from a particular political standpoint with which I disagreed, that convinces me that when it comes to standing on principle he is light years ahead of the many who now flaunt themselves at the head of the new human rights industry. But those were the days of the Jayewardene government, when you had many highly intelligent politicians who had bought into authoritarianism. So one word from Lalith Athulathmudali was enough to silence Marga. Dayan himself had to go underground soon after, to emerge again when pluralism became acceptable after the Indian intervention…” |
To give Radhika her due, the events of 1983 emboldened her finally,
and she brought out with logistic support from ICES a publication that
set out very clearly the context of the ethnic violence of the time.
Yet again, typically, doubtless to keep the Board happy, the publication
was through something called the Committee for Rational Development,
and Dayan Jayatilleka had to take the lead. That was when I first met
him, and it is the memory of his courage then, albeit courage from a
particular political standpoint with which I disagreed, that convinces
me that when it comes to standing on principle he is light years ahead
of the many who now flaunt themselves at the head of the new human rights
industry.
But those were the days of the Jayewardene government, when you had
many highly intelligent politicians who had bought into authoritarianism.
So one word from Lalith Athulathmudali was enough to silence Marga.
Dayan himself had to go underground soon after, to emerge again when
pluralism became acceptable after the Indian intervention, and Marxists
of a different sort became the enemy, to be hunted with even greater
ruthlessness than the Tamils had had to endure.
All that is a far cry from today, and we have to be thankful that the
monolithic authoritarianism of those days is gone now, with its constitutional
amendments at will, preposterous appointments to the Supreme Court and
then barracking of judges, a parliament that lasted over eleven years
with a party leader able almost without question to throw people out
and appoint anyone he wanted to replace them. So the civil society organizations
of today have very little to fear from this government. But, as we can
see, they also have much more to gain from another, at least those who,
unlike Sarvodaya and many other local quietly achieving grassroots entities,
do not have a distinctive reputation for practical achievements on behalf
of Sri Lankan people. For the proponents of theory, as this project
document and I suspect many others will make clear, there is the hope
once again of massive funding, thrown into their laps as it were by
decision makers.
The Industry's hopes for the future
So it is scarcely a wonder that they long once again for Bradman, so
ceremoniously installed as Chairman too of ICES, to become Prime Minister's
Secretary for the fourth or is it the fifth time. It is not a wonder
that they seek to denigrate the current government, hoping for a change
that may bring back some elements of the eighties, but elements that
now know to use amenable civil society elements instead of engaging
in the confrontation of those days. To achieve this end they, some at
least I hope for idealistic motives, distort truth, publicize dubious
information, inflate statistics.
So doubtless we will over the next few weeks have desperate attempts
to kick poor Louise Arbour around in the way this project shows the
senior branch of the UN, the UNDP, was kicked around, to drag Dominick
Chilcott before he departs to another editorial chair, to expand the
list of the President's relations to include not just the Governor of
the Central Bank but the IGP and the army commander and perhaps Justice
Bhagwati himself.
And they can do this secure in the knowledge that they will not suffer
any adverse reaction, except in words. That I think is why they find
my writings, and those of the others Prof Uyangoda thinks capable of
writing reasonably good English, so irritating. In the first place,
they have been used for the last few years on having a monopoly on constructive
use of English, which they have used to obtain vast amounts of funding
to continue with their primary task, which is to find even greater amounts
of funding, for all the good their surveys and awareness raising and
films about dancing butterflies and so on have produced.
Secondly, and perhaps more seriously, our detailed accounts of their
shady techniques, together with analysis of their achievements set against
the funding proposals, should lead to an inquiry into the manner in
which so much money was flung around so loosely during the early years
of the Ceasefire. Such an inquiry would show how characters like Bradman
flung away money that should have been used for the practical upliftment
of our people, for human resource development that could have contributed
to the prosperous pluralistic society we want.
Whether he did this foolishly thinking that peace could be bought,
or hoping that the people could be maneuvered into accepting the type
of agreement his government was proposing, or simply jockeying to command
enough votes to return to power, needs to be looked into carefully.
But I suspect there will be no such inquiry, for the simple reason that
this government is basically indulgent towards its critics. The single-mindedness
of a Lalith Athulathmudali is lacking, and no one particularly cares
about the abuse of trust, when funds which should be used to benefit
Sri Lankans are used for other purposes. In any other country it would
be considered essential that the public should know how much funding
all these awareness building institutions have been given, by whom,
for what purposes and to what extent those purposes were achieved. But
we continue content with endless attacks on the government by some of
these institutions, and then counter attacks based on reasons that are
not very clear, so that the public cannot distinguish fact from fiction.
But all these monies belong in effect to the Sri Lankan people. The facts should be made clear, and then we will see I hope that most institutions are less culpable than foolish. If there has been abuse, it will be clear who precisely is responsible, and we can then cease to have blame flung around at random. And we might also be saved from ridiculous allegations about money being given to Tigers when, even after they had categorically withdrawn from negotiations, so much was thrust at them by the most senior of government servants.
Disclaimer: The comments contained
within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents
of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the
views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual
authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any
loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which
you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or
reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site.
All views and opinions presented in this article are solely those of
the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of LankaWeb.com. .
Copyright
© 1997-2004 www.lankaweb.Com
Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reproduction In Whole Or In Part Without Express Permission is Prohibited.