CLASSIFIED | POLITICS | TERRORISM | OPINION | VIEWS





 .
 .

 .
 .
.
 

Diplomatic Manouverings For Personal Agendas
Cannot Victimise A Patriotic Intellectual Of High Office And Repute.

In Retrospect By Sarath Kumara For LankaWeb
Feb.15th 2008

It certainly appears that Sri Lanka's out going High Commissioner in London, Mrs. Ksenuka Senewiratne a controversial figure in her own right who is purported to have been pre-empted from her staus in the UK by another diplomat for very definite Governmental contentions that apparently did not require her services for the post any longer seems to have somehow squirmed into the favour of another Sri Lankan big wig equally controversial with a touch of bourgeoisie to moot to find a quick fix to her current employment dilemma.

It might not have been of much consequence, as such occurences are quite commonplace in the diplomatic jockeying of developing countries where patronage amd favouritism are often the criteria for selection over qualifications and merit but this time around it seems to be something which cannot be shrugged off as bureaucratic bungling or a simple diplomatic faux pas as it involves one of Sri Lanka's most charismatic and intellectual sons who has been in the news lately!None other than Dr Dayan Jayatilleke.

Due to an ongoing rift between Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama and the outspokenly eloquent and mercurial Dr Jayatilleke, said have fallen out of favour with the Foreign Minister there is great speculation in certain circles that Dr.Jayathilleke might be replaced as Ambassador to the United Nations Permanent Mission in Geneva by Mrs Ksenuka Senewiratne who appears to have indulged in a bit of personal skull duggery but has probably made a grave mistake in targetting Dr.Jayatilleke for reasons which are neither treasonous notr Nation unfriendlt as he is one of the most eloquent campaigners for Sri lanka's elimination of the LTTE Terrorists and is viewed i great admiration by many for his outspokenness which does not include random conjecture nor a lackey mentality! and to the contary has objectives and idealogies which are in the nation's best interests and could prove to be astutely wise towards the Nation's future and posterity!

This speculative and perhaps dastardly entrepreneurial exercise by the collective manouverings of the Senewiratne~ Bogollagama association towards evicting Dr. Jayathilleke from his diplomatic appointment has come to light through unconfirmed but reliable sources that Mrs Senewiratne is thought to be the favourite choice of Sri Lanka's Foreign Minister, Rohitha Bogollagama to become the ambassador of the island nation's permanent mission of the United Nation's in Geneva which if she reaches this position will be through an "un" official squeezing out of Dr, Jayatilleke by the assumed powers vested in the Foreign Minister whether through fair of foul means and needs to be considered a travesty of justice if the action was ever successful.

The current ambassador, Dr. Dayan Jayatilleke is" said to be in hot water albeit loosely coined to suit the circumstances which indicate displeasure by the Foreign Minister and his chief consort Mrs Senewiratne after the former wrote an article attacking the British Foreign Secretary David Milliband , entitled "Mind your Language" in a daily newspaper which was also repeated in Sri Lanka government news portals, according to Ministry of Foreign Affairs sources.

Now the story goes from the sublime to the ridiculous, if the news reports are to be in anyway believed as the article "Mind Your Language" refered to and written by Dr Jayatilleke is a clear cut indication of his salient patriotism to his Motherland and the response to it by the Foreign Minister indicative of a very negative nature which is amazingly also compounded by an attitude of
naive complicity to the British Foreign Secretary Milliband who appears to be very deserving of the criticisms levelled by Dr Jayatilleke as any discerning reader of the text would conclude where Dr.Jayatilleke has spoken out against issues which are very plausible and certainly need inviting attention to.

As the story now gets curiouser, in what seems to be a rank display of opportunism which it seems tantamount to, in London, at a diplomatic officer's meeting at the SL High Commission , Mrs Seneviratne has apparently verbally 'attacked' Sri Lanka's Geneva Ambassador Jayatilleke saying that she had volunteered to "apologize" to the British Foreign office for the "uncalled for" statement of Dr. Dayan Jayatilleke but where does she get the authority to such an entitlement which is not only high handed but also indicaive of the degree to which she patronises the Sri Lankan Foreign Minister?

It would be putting it mildly to describe this scenario as somewhat typical perhaps comical of the goings on at a top diplomatic level with rank disregard to the etiquettes shared by fellow diplomats under the same flag where the definition of the term diplomacy somehow seems to have been circumvented for the term paying homage to an indiscriminate White Sahib of a distinctly autocratic and infamous Colonial past where by her ludicrous attitude she depicts herself in very poor light as does her peer the Foreign Minister both whom apparently prefer to pay the said homage to the British Foreign Secretary rather than stand their ground to affirm what Dr. Jayatilleke has stated unequivocally and courageously on behalf of his country!

In a veritable mish mash of criticisms Seneviratne has criticised Dr Jayatilleke 's criticism of Milliband accusing the former of improperly construing what the latter has said in his article under review that unfair public criticism should be replied to by fair criticism as Dr. Dayan Jayatilleke has emphasized albeit moderately where he should probably have shouted it from the top of a mountain! given to the circumstances.

While it has now come to light that Dr. Jayatilleke has not been in the good books of Minister Bogollagama for some time, apparently common knowledge amongst upper echelons of Government and diplomatic circles, the former Sri Lankan High Commissioner in the UK appears to have capitalised on what she infers as a faux pas by Dr. Jayatilleke who has said , "No self respecting state can respond in private, to criticism of it in public."

Now here's the icing on the cake! Mrs Kshenuka Seneviratne, once travelled with Foreign Minister Bogollagama to the Commonwealth summit in Africa and advised him on saving Pakistan from its expulsion from the Commonwealth but later it became a fiasco when Sri Lanka failed to help its friend, Pakistan. Some attributed the failure to the inexperience of both the minister and the advisor which seems to leave little to the imagination quite unsurprisingly.

While Mrs Seneviratne suggests that both Foreign Minister Bogollagama and the Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Palitha Kohona were appalled by the statement of Dr. Dayan Jayatilleke, neither of them were were available for comment. towards confirmation of her allegation.

Mrs. Kshenuka Seneviratne perhaps towards adding further grist to her mill of personal discontenet has further made accusations that Dr. Jayatilleke has made controversial statements about Canada and Israel although not classifying what they were.

Anyone with a little bit of savvy about the posturings of Canada and Israel relative to Sri Lanka must surely be aware that both these countries have had a dubious track record about their responses to Sri Lanka's terrorist problem and there have been instances where their true sympathies have not been indicative of whole heartedly being with Sovereign Sri Lanka! Israel in particular has often displayed a double standard where on one side her vehement stand against so called Arab terrorism mirror imaged her indifference to Sri Lanka's need in a relative sense although some logistics, Military Hardware and Fighter Jets have reached Sri Lanka through difficult negotiations, at times third parties and some arm twisting whereas Liberal Canada also has been duplicitous (until the present Conservative Regime which turned tables on the LTTE ) in leaning towards the LTTE almost openly! If Dr Jayathilleke has spoken out against either of these countries for the suggested aberrations he has done so equitably and astutelty! In this sense neither Mrs Seneviratne nor the Foreign Minister has much ground to stand on if they object to Dr. Jayatilleke's direction and inspirations without an alternative to his direction of patriotic reasoning!


It also seems somewhat obstreperous of Mrs Seneviratne to suggest to the diplomatic officials of her mission in the UK even hypothetically that Colombo was taking action regarding Dr.Jayatilleke even if there was such an expectation by some who were opposed to him as it is a breach of many protocols involved and a matter for the President to initiate and execute rather than some fluttering of diplomatic discontent!

The President being the pragmatic and impartial administrator he is with his sense of righteousness thus far appears to be non committal on the related issues and logically it must be assumed that Mrs Seneviratne certainly does not make Presidential policies nor is she influential towards their formulation and ratification while Dr. Jayatilleke is someone whom the President greatly respects not only towards idealogies but his intellectual status, wisdom and high level of education which speaks a lot for the disparities between the Senevirane and Jayatilleka points of view and also in terms of their motivations as the President might overview them somewhat objectively and perhaps with chagrin for Dr Jayatilleke's opponents! Particularly that of Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama, said to be drifting away from his President, more towards the foreign policies of Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe and you guessed it! former President Chandrika Kumaratunga and an eyebrow raiser beyond speculation.

The greatest sin of ommission said to have been committed by Dr.Jayatilleke according to Mrs Senewiratne regarding his criticism of British Foreign Secretary Milliband is his having said while refering to Millibands message addressed to Sri Lanka 's Independence Day Celebration, that "The statement does not congratulate or wish Sri Lanka well on her important Independence Anniversary. It moves straight into a little homily commending reflection, a reminder from the former colonial master on the need for such a practice. While it bewails and bemoans civilian deaths, the three paragraph statement makes no reference to the LTTE, terrorism or separatism. It contains not the slightest hint of solidarity in the struggle against terrorism, from a fellow democracy.

It concludes with the unctuous observation that "Violence can never provide an answer to Sri Lanka's problems." This leaves one wondering if violence can ever provide an answer to Iraq's or Afghanistan's problems, because in both countries British troops are present, engaging in the practice precisely of violence! Neither country is part of Britain. In both countries British troops are invaders. Neither country did any harm to Britain. In the case of one, Britain led the pack in lying to the world and its own people about WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) as a prelude to invading and occupying it."

While there is hardly a need for speculation from the direction of Governance about the ends result of what seems to be a combination of the ancient duo of Machiavelli and Mata Hari in a concerted effort to oust a much focussed and intellectually adept Dr Jayatilleke from his moorings in Geneva, it will be also be interesting to see the Governmental response towards transparencies which are likely to reveal a few cracks in the Foreign Ministry mirror reflecting an unlikely coalition for an obtuse objective.

In retrospect,
Diplomatic Manouverings For Personal Agendas Cannot Victimise A Patriotic Intellectual Of High Office And Repute.






Disclaimer: The comments contained within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site.
All views and opinions presented in this article are solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of LankaWeb.com. .

BACK TO LATEST NEWS

DISCLAIMER

Copyright © 1997-2004 www.lankaweb.Com Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reproduction In Whole Or In Part Without Express Permission is Prohibited.