CLASSIFIED | POLITICS | TERRORISM | OPINION | VIEWS





 .
 .

 .
 .
.
 

Without Prejudice

THE LIBERATION TIGERS OF TAMIL EELAM [LTTE] AT 32

by D.B.S. Jeyaraj

May 6th, 2008
Thirty-two years ago, on May 5th 1976 , around 40 - 50 Tamils met clandestinely at a secret location in the Jaffna peninsula and formed themselves into an organization called the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

Umamaheswaran became its leader. Prabakharan was made military commander.A five member committee was appointed to control and co-ordinate the new movement. Both Umamaheswaran and Prabakharan were members of this committee.

Their objective was unambiguously clear. The LTTE goal was to establish an independent state called Tamil Eelam in the northern and eastern provinces of Sri Lanka.

A revolutionary armed struggle relying on guerrilla warfare was to be waged against the Sinhala dominated Sri Lankan state.

Nine days later on May 14th the newly formed Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) passed a resolution at Vaddukkoddai demanding Tamil Eelam-a separate state for the Tamils of Sri Lanka.
In July 1977 the TULF contested the Parliamentary elections on a secessionist platform. The TULF said in its manifesto that the elections was a referendum and that votes for the party meant a mandate for Tamil Eelam.

The TULF swept the polls in the Tamil majority electorates of the North-East winning 18 Seats. TULF Secretary-General Appapillai Amirthalingam became leader of the opposition. The goals of the TULF and LTTE were the same on paper. In practice the relatively moderate TULF was prepared to compromise and eventually agreed to the District Development Councils as an alternative to Tamil Eelam.

The militant youths referred to as "Boys" did not agree with this and continued to pursue their goal of Tamil Eelam through violent methods.

The anti-Tamil pogrom of July 1983 was a watershed that brought moderate and militant Tamils together temporarily.

Meanwhile the LTTE split in two. A large number of members broke away under the leadership of Umamaheswaran and formed the Peoples Liberation Organization of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE). Some like Nagarajah, Aiyer etc went their own way.

Only a handful of the original LTTE members remained loyal to Prabakharan. A frustrated Prabakharan went away to India and stayed there for a while.

In his absence a triad comprising Seelan, Mahathaya and Ragu " managed" the LTTE in Sri Lanka.
At one point the LTTE with its depleted ranks began working together with the Tamil Eelam Liberation organization (TELO) led by Thangathurai and Kuttimani.

There was a time when Prabakharan wanted to merge the LTTE remnants under him with the TELO and form a new organization.This however did not happen.

The arrests of TELO leaders Thangathurai , Kuttimani and Jegan by the Navy in 1981 brought an end to the TELO-LTTE cooperation.

The LTTE began functioning independently under Prabakharan who was both its leader and military commander.Later Charles Anthony alias Seelan became military chief.

By July 1983 the LTTE cadre numbered thirty. There were twenty-three full-time members and seven part-timers.

There were also many "helpers" of all ages in different walks of life. The LTTE killed 13 soldiers through a landmine at Thirunelvely on July 23rd 1983. This resulted in the 1983 anti-Tamil violence. There was a spontaneous "rush" by Tamil youths to join the militant movements and fight for Tamil Eelam. India began training and arming the movements

The struggle for Tamil Eelam itself underwent many bizarre twists and peculiar turns. There was internecine warfare among the movements. The LTTE became the dominant Tamil group. The Indo-Lanka agreement of July 29th 1987 caused a sea change in Tamil politics. Except for the LTTE all other Tamil parties and organizations accepted it and opted to give up the Tamil Eelam struggle and accept devolution provided under the 13th amendment to the Constitution.

The LTTE also agreed initially, surrendered some arms and even accepted a monthly payment of money from New Delhi as an "incentive" in the early stages. The tigers however changed track soon and resumed hostilities, daring to take on the Indian army.

The past years have seen many rounds of peace talks between the LTTE and different governments in Colombo. None of them succeeded and the Coutry suffers endless war interspersed with temporary spells of no-war.

In the meantime the LTTE has achieved tremendous "growth" in certain aspects. The double digit membership of 1983 is in five digits today.The LTTE is a transnational entity today with front organizations among the wide-spread Tamil Diaspora.

From 1990 the LTTE has succeeded in keeping under its control sizeable parts of the North-East. The areaof this "de-facto" state has fluctuated periodically.

Tiger territory has increased and decreased according to the fortunes of war.Yet there has always been a sphere of LTTE control.

Within this LTTE area the tigers have set up structures like Police stations, Courts, inland revenue offices,TV, Radio, film unit, newspapers ,banks,immigration and emigration offices, business ventures, farms, etc. The tigers have even drafted their own laws.

Militarily the LTTE has grown. They have infantry brigades, womens brigades, commando units and specialised divisions for laying mines, sniping, firing mortars and artillery, resisting tanks and armoured cars etc.

The tigers also have a naval wing known as sea tigers and a fledgling air wing called Air tigers. The LTTE has many marine vessels and a limited number of small aircraft.

The LTTE also has an elaborate overseas network with the Tamil Diaspora as its base. There are multimple media organs engaging in propaganda and myriad activists raising funds.

The tigers have the capacity to organize mass demonstrations at short notice in many western cities.
The LTTE also runs many commercial enterprises in several countries both west and east.They also have a fleet of ships transporting arms acquired overseas to North Sri Lanka.

In short the LTTE growth in the past 25 years has been phenomenal. It is perhaps the only enterprise run" for, of and by" the Tamil people in Sri Lanka that has registered "success" of this magnitude after July 1983.

This successful growth has come at immense cost to the Tamil people of Sri Lanka.
Vertically the LTTE may have gone up but horizontally the Sri Lankan Tamils have gone down.

This is the unpleasant and inconvenient truth that the LTTE and acolytes often deny and do not like to hear.

The first world war was only four years long from 1914 to 1918.The second world war was six years from 1939 to 1945.

This war for Tamil Eelam has gone on for decades and decades with an intensity and ferocity that has debilitated the Tamil people immensely.

The Tamil areas have undergone a staggered "scorched earth policy" cunningly implemented in phases by different regimes. Death, injury, destruction, displacement etc are part of daily life.
Fishing has dwindled. Agriculture has diminished. Industry is virtually non - existent. The economy has decayed and unemployment is rampant. Single parent families, widows, orphans etc are widely prevalent.

Education the mainstay of Tamils has suffered considerably. Many schools do not function. Hospitals are run down. People are displaced from their homes under the pretext of setting up security zones.
The quality of life has gone down. Infant mortality rates, malnutrition, stunted growth etc are areas where Tamils in the North-east are affected more.

The social fabric of Tamil society is torn badly, cultural life shrinks, Values are brutalised. Ethical codes crumble.These are the effects of long term war on a small, powerless people.

The worst impact has been on demography. Tamils have left the Country in very large numbers. Equally large numbers have moved to areas outside the North and East. Only 42 % of Sri Lankan Tamils are said to be living in the North-East now.

Some years ago at a seminar in Colombo retired Indian Judge V. Krishna Iyer stated that Tamils be given full autonomy.

Former Central Bank governor N.U.Jayewardena wrote to the newspapers in response.
NU made three observations. Firstly he said the Sri Lankan population would stabilise to zero growth in 2025. Secondly he said that the high rates of Tamils leaving the Country indicated that the Tamils would only be 1.9 % in 2025. Thirdly NU said that 1. 9 % was a "manageable minority that need not be given autonomy".

Thanks to comparatively higher educational standards and social problems like dowry, late marriages, aversion to female children etc the Tamil birth rate has been on the decline even before 1983.

The census figures of 1963, 1971 and 1981 show gradual decrease percentage wise. If a proper census is taken now the Tamil population percentage would be much less. It may not be 1. 9 % as NU said but it could certainly be less than 5%.

The Tamils may have proved a point by taking up arms against the state dominated by the numerically larger Sinhala people. But ultimately demomgraphy would defeat the Tamils.
The LTTE and its supporters often assert that a guerilla movement fighting for the goal of national liberation cannot be defeated militarily. This may or may not be true but the point to be taken note of is something else.

If the prolonged armed struggle for Tamil Eelam is leading to a gradual decline of the Tamil population in Sri Lanka then the ultimate losers will be the Tamils themselves.

A minority would be made a microscopic minority and therefore made easily manageable by the numerical majority.

It does not matter then whether the LTTE is defeated or not because the Tamils will be weakened quantitatively and qualitatively.

To put it bluntly the so called "Sinhala state" need not win this war. All it has to do is prolong the war and sustain the pressure. The Tamils would be drastically reduced in numbers . This is already happening in the Island.

It is against this backdrop that the LTTE turned 32 on May 5th.Through the sacrifices and dedication of its cadre on the one hand and the ruthless violence and authoritative intolerance on the other hand the LTTE has become the dominant politico-military force of the Sri Lankan Tamils today.

The tigers have become the self-appointed sole representatives of the Tamil people.This columnist does not accept the LTTE as the sole representatives of the Tamils. Not merely the LTTE but no entity on earth can claim to be the sole representatives of a nation or people. The reality however is that the LTTE remains today the dominant entity among Sri Lankan Tamils. It is the single-most powerful non-state actor among Tamils.

Along with such power should come a sense of responsibility. As former British premier Stanley Baldwin once observed "power without responsibility has been the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages".

The LTTE has been the determining force in Sri Lankan politics for many years. Tragically the tigers have been the sole arbiters of Tamil destiny in Sri Lanka. The LTTE asserts that creating Tamil Eelam is the only solution and that Tamils must suffer and sacrifice in order to achieve it. According to tiger acolytes Velupillai Prabakharan is the only Tamil leader steadfastly advocating the cause of Tamil Eelam. All others have abandoned it and are therefore traitors.
But the multi-crore question is at what cost?

The Bible queries whether it is worth gaining the whole world and yet lose one's soul.
There is a Tamil provern "Suvar irunthaal thaan Sithiram varaiyalaam". (One can draw a fresco only if a wall exists). Can Tamil Eelam be established in the Island while the Tamil people get reduced in numbers?

There is also the question of whether the LTTE can achieve Tamil Eelam? The real estate it controlled once has shrunk in size. Can it recapture these areas militarily?

The tigers have alienated the Muslims living in the North and East and also the Sinhalese. In recent times due to the Karuna revolt a large number of Eastern Tamils have spurned the quest for Tamil Eelam.

There is also the case of Tamils living outside the North-East. Unless there is violence like in India during the time of partition most of them would not like to return to Tamil Eelam. The expatriate Tamils of an older generation may say emotionally that they would return but very few would actually do so.

As for the second generation they are-as Prabakharan himself once commented-a "lost generation" (tholainthu pona santhathi). At best they may come for extended vacations. Apart from the desirability and attainability of Tamil Eelam there is also the question of viability and the situation within Tamil Eelam if it materialises.

Given the tenacity of the Sri Lankan state in resisting separation there is little chance of Colombo accepting Tamil Eelam.

Assuming that Tamil Eelam comprises the present Northern and eastern provinces the land and sea borders would be very long and large. There would be constant friction and strife.
Even if the Sinhala people accept Tamil Eelam India would not. Thus India would move in quckly and crush it.

Given the current geo-strategic configuration there is no chance that New Delhi would ever countenance an Independent Tamil state in the Indian ocean unless the Sinhala government does something incredibly stupid.

Even if that happens (highly unlikely) the Tamil areas of Sri Lanka may be attached to India as a union territory or protectorate. There would be no independent Tamil Eelam. If and when Tamil Eelam evolves notwithstanding these factors the resources of the nascent state would be devoted mainly for military purposes. In a climate of war very little foreign investment could be expected. The Tamil Eelam state will be an economic basket case.

The focus on national security will result in a negation of democracy, pluralism and human rights. All these would be denied under the pretext that an external enemy is at the gates. The despotic rule of the LTTE in the regions under its control would be replicated on a much larger and institutionalised scale.

Even though the LTTE boasts about its parallel state administration the reality is that food and fuel have to come from outside. Besides the salaries and expenses of Government employees, school teachers, medical staff etc are all being currently paid by Colombo.

The LTTE may have made a name for itself through its armed struggle. But its strength is basically its destructive capacity and not constructive capability.

In recent times the LTTE has acquired a negative image internationally. The conscription of child soldiers, suicide killer attacks and the adoption of terrorist modes at times has given it a terrible reputation.

Despite its impressive feats on the battlefront the LTTE is isolated internationally. Some of the most powerful nations of the world including the USA, India, Britain, Canada and the EU countries have proscribed it as a terrorist organization.

Significantly the LTTE does not enjoy support on a large scale even among the Tamils of India. There is sympathy for the Tamil plight but very little regard for the LTTE. The support of tiger sympathisers like Nedumaran, Vaiko etc is negligible.

It is in such a situation that the LTTE reaches 32 years in age. After decades of fighting that has debilitated and diminished the Tamil people what are the concrete gains made by the LTTE in winning back the lost rights of the Tamil people?

Death , displacement and destruction have enveloped the Tamil areas for many years. Despite all this suffering and sorrow undergone by the Tamil people what has the LTTE achieved in its perennial quest for Tamil Eelam?

Their redressing of valid Tamil grievances and the accommodation of legitimate Tamil aspirations is possible in two ways. One is through the arduous route of secession and the other is through equitable power sharing arrangements within a united but not necessarily unitary Sri Lanka..
The LTTE while paying lip service to the concept of a political solution has sabotaged any worthwhile effort aimed at meaningful negotiations. It would have the Tamils believe that only Tamil Eelam can achieve results and that only the tigers can quench this thirst for Tamil Eelam.

The truth however is that the LTTE has many , many miles to go before it can ever hope to attain Tamil Eelam. Even then the quest is elusive as the odds are stacked effectively against it.
It is like the search of a blind man for a black cat in a dark room. Only in this case the cat is not there. Also the Tamil people are made to pay a heavy price.

Like a compulsive gambler Prabakharan has risked the entire existence of the Tamil people as a vibrant ethnicity in Sri Lanka for the elusive goal of Tamil Eelam. It is an all or nothing gamble for him.

He is like an invading military general who burns his boats so that his soldiers have no choice other than to fight on for victory or face death. There is no turning back.
If the soldiers win the war the general will be praised for his steely determination. If they lose there wont be anyone left to tell the tale.

Ultimately the success or failure of the LTTE cannot be gauged by the size of its military assets or the destruction and losses inflicted upon the enemy.
The proper criteria is to see how far the LTTE has progressed on its journey towards Tamil Eelam?
In terms of a cost benefit ratio assessment is the progress (if any) achieved commensurate to the heavy price being paid by the Tamil people?

The ultimate political destination of the Tamil people can only be the full restoration of lost rights. The important question is whether the LTTE is on the right track?
How long will the LTTE persist with its unrealistic quest for Tamil Eelam? How long must the powerless Tamil people suffer due to this protracted war?
It is time for the 32 year old LTTE to do some soul-searching!


Disclaimer: The comments contained within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site.
All views and opinions presented in this article are solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of LankaWeb.com. .

BACK TO LATEST NEWS

DISCLAIMER

Copyright © 1997-2004 www.lankaweb.Com Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reproduction In Whole Or In Part Without Express Permission is Prohibited.